Section Cases Flashcards
Self Defence
S18 NFOAP 1997
Keatley - def ppl of no relation
Commane - strangled post KO
McInnes -burden retreat
NI v Browne - provoke V
Farrell - stab escape
Crawford - 1997 S18 Obj/Subj
Nally - knacks
Keenan - 2 caravan -
Defence of Swelling CLA 2011
Intoxication
MBA LBAK
Majewski -
Beard - Spec intent - incapable
AG v NI - whiskey kill wife
Eadon - k mother in drug atk
Lipman - LSD
Bailey - insulin
Allen = misjudgement not allow
Kingston - spiked = defence
Intention
Indirect: Coffey - D knows Act= consequences not-Primary-Purpose
Murray-fixed purpse desird obj
Hull - Natural & Probable
Clifford-engag condct bring rslt
Nedrick - Virtual certainty
Woolin - VC + D appreciated
LRC 2008
Murder
Benko-Hammer circumstances
Lynch - Argued Art 6 + Constit
Cato - Heroin inject
Kennedy - Voluntary informed act
Holzier - split lip trivial
Scarlet - fell escorted out of pub
Larkin - Razer mistress
Crosbie Meehan - knife brawl
Hayward - chased thyroid wife
Dangerous Driving S53 RTA 1961
Cullagh -GNMS fairground
Robbery
CLA Theft&Fraud 2001
Hale - tying up
Clauden - V need not resist
Mangan - nun car
O’Neill - D himself not steal
S25 = Forgery
S14 = robbery
Kanwar - lying AGS Goods origin
Pitechley - Failing to act once realise stolen
S15;17;18 Possession Handling Recving
Incitement
Higgins-mere expression not incitemnt
Capaldi - monetary offer
Goldman - seek influence minds others
Most - ad to kill heads state
Fitzmaurice - recruit -imp not def-inc=encouragement
Curr -
Whitehouse-need not be capable comit
Attempt
Thornton- need be beyond preparatory
Campbell - held mere preparatory
Richmond- broke in+petrol+shavings
Sullivan-Acts leading up no imediate✔
Murder:
White - poison mother
Douglas&Hayes -Mr is atempt kill if only attempt cause serious harm=S4 assault
Conspiracy
Parnell - Combo person-wrg act to injr
Nock - impossible defence
Sew Hoy - offence upon agreement
Gillane - Need not know V identity
Secondary Participation
S7 1997 NFOAP-aid/abet/counsel
A&B:
Clarkson-Scene+encourage/assist=✔
Coney-Presence=evidence of accessory
Brown- coughing [slight participant]=✔
Madden - car to be used in violent crim
Egan-ag rob- knew nature not ag=still✔
Ryan- stood by as V killed presence alone sufficient as’lend support to D1’
Counsel:advice prior to commission
Maxwell - UVF car
Ginanetto - pat on back=encouragemnt
Procure:
AG Ref No.1 1975-spiked drink drive
Common Design
Murray-kill AGS no evidence of plan
Eccles - ‘garda taken care of’ in meeting
Doohan-S4 a V-shot instead-unusual
Ryan-Knowledge of weapon=inferred agreement to injure V
Dekker-sheers=S4 or kill
Rahman-Blunt weapon-stab-if one D REALISED POSSIBILITY= convict all
Walter - innocent agency -parents trik
Whitehouse - Timely comunicate aband
Gauthier-Proprtionate steps to particip
[1]Agreement contain offence?[2]Offence in contemplation of D?
Accessory after the fact=S7 CLA 1997
Provocation
MacEoin -
MacNamara
outside ordinary interactions
given fixed characteristics of D
Rape
Oluboja - intimidation consent
Linekar - no pay hooker
Sherlock - condom
McNally - consented to male sex
C O’R - issue of fact
CC - S1.1 1935 - SL
C - Fraud identity
Singing coach
McDonagh -S2.2 always to jury if consnt
Dica - HIV S3-4 assault
Morgan - Honest belief
LRC 2019 - Reasonable belief
Sexual Assault
Tobassum - breast survey
Bernier-patient breast/testicles D purpose = not relevant
Court - indecent to right minded person
Salim - cheeks ejaculate
10 years
Public Place Definition
A street, road or other place to which the public have access with vehicles whether as of right or by permission and whether subject to or free of charge
Right to Silence
Art 38.1[due course law] & Art 40.6.1 [Expression] & Art 6 ECHR
Cummins - Judge rules - AC cautioned on his right to silence
Heaney - S52 AGS fail account for movements OASA 1939
HC held 38.1 -SC held 40.6.1[i]
Right not absolute inferences in situations S18;19;19A
Rock -constitutionality of S18;19;19A
- Failure to account substance/mark-Inference AGS ask whereabouts- Failure mention facts later relied upon -
Held curtail for common good
Only inferences not basis for conviction
Finnerty - Prosecution cannot X-exam D chose to stay silent - jury cannot draw inferences from this.
KM - doctor referred to prepd statement - jury should’ve been directd
Sweeney challenged S9 OASA [withold info ‘material assistance’] held not self incrim therefore permitted
Arrest
S4 CLA 1997 - Arrest
S4[1] Detention committed/attempted arrestable offence
AGS reasonable grounds believe necessary for PROPER INVESTIGATION
Super intendant extend 6 hrs + 12hrs
Chief Supper intendant apply DC/CC for 72/48hrs if reasonable grounds [max 1 week] - Under CJA Drug Tracking Act 1996
Access to Lawyer
Healy - denied access rude = illegal
Clarke - can severe illegal portions
Gormley & White once D request Solicitor- pause interrogation
O’Brien - Deliberate chose S take long
Salduz - ECHR = Right to Access
Finnegan - consult in private
Lavery - no right be present in interview
Doyle - 60 hrs 40 min -firm character
Recklessness
D consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk
With consideration given to D’s conduct and circumstances
Cunningham - gas meter = D must be aware of risk
Caldwell [2] - Obvious risks
Lawrence [3] Obvious+Serious risks
R v G&R [4] - subj- D set fire thought would die out = held innocent
CLIFFORD - Occured to D that his consequence would bring about result but proceeds anyways
Moral Penal Code S2.02[2] [c] -
D Consciously disregards
Substantial & unjustifiable risk
-
Risk is of Nature & Degree that
Considering D conduct+circumstances
