Section 5 - Market Failure Flashcards

1
Q

Market Failure

A

> A market fails when the price mechanism (i.e. the forces of supply and demand) fails to allocate scarce resources efficiently and society suffers as a result.
Market failure is a common problem and governments often intervene to try to prevent it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 types of market failure?

A
  1. Complete

2. Partial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Complete market failure

A

> When there’s complete market failure, no market exists - this is called a ‘missing market’.
National defence is an example of a missing market as there is no market which allocates national defence.
This means that governments need to intervene and provide it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Partial market failure

A

> When the market functions, but either the price or quantity supplied of the good/service is wrong, then there’s partial failure.
The provision of health care, if left completely to market forces, is an example of partial failure.
If health care was left to market forces, then some people wouldn’t be able to afford the treatment they needed. As a result, governments might intervene and provide free health care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Externalities

A

> Externalities are the effects that producing or consuming a good/service has on people who aren’t involved in the making, buying/selling and consumption of the good/service.
Positive or negative.
Can occur in production or consumption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Externalities - definition

A

> The external costs or benefits to a third party that isn’t involved in the making, buying/selling and consumption of a specific good/service.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Positive externalities - definition

A

> The external benefits to a third party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negative externalities - definition

A

> The external costs to a third party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why does partial market failure occur?

A

> A private cost is the cost of doing something to either a consumer or a firm.
External costs are caused by externalities.
Adding the private cost to the external cost gives the social cost.
The social cost is the full cost borne by society of a good or service.
A private benefit is the benefit gained by the consumer or a firm by doing something.
External benefits are caused by externalities.
Adding the private benefit to the external benefit gives the social benefit.
The social benefit is the full benefit received by society from a good or service.
Market failure occurs because in a free market the price mechanism will only take into account the private costs and benefits, but not the external costs and benefits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Externalities diagrams

A

> The difference between the MPC and MSC curves is the external cost of production - the negative externalities.
If the MPC and MSC curves are parallel then external costs per unit produced are constant.
If the curves diverge then external costs per unit increase with output.
The difference between the MPB and MSB curves are the external benefits - the positive externalities.
If the MPB and MSB curves are parallel then external benefits per unit are constant. If they diverge then external benefits per unit increase with output.
An example of when the curves might diverge is vaccination - the more people that are vaccinated, the greater the protection for unvaccinated people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Equilibrium point on externalities diagrams

A

> When supply = demand in a free market, there’s an equilibrium.
In a free market consumers and producers only consider their private costs and private benefits - they ignore any social costs or benefits. So demand curve = MPB and supply curve = MPC.
So equilibrium is when MPB = MPC.
However the socially optimal level of output is where MSC = MSB, because this includes the external costs and benefits to society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Negative production externalities

A

> Ignoring negative externalities in production causes overproduction and underpricing of a good/service - more is produced and sold at a lower price than is desirable for society.
For each unit of the good produced between Qm and Q*, the marginal social cost is greater than the marginal social benefit.
The area between the MSC and MSB is the the area of welfare loss - the loss to society caused by ignoring externalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Positive externalities in consumption

A

> In the free market only private benefits are considered so positive externalities in consumption would cause underconsumption and underpricing of the good - less is consumed and sold at a lower price than is desirable for society.
For each unit of this good consumed between Qm and Q* the MSB is greater than the MSC.
The area between the MSB and MSC is the area of potential welfare gain - the gain to society lost by ignoring externalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examples of positive consumption externalities

A

> Education: better educated workforce = more productive = increases country’s output. Furthermore, increasing education levels has other social benefits such as reduced crime levels and a happier population.
Health care: healthier workforce = more productive as less time off work = increases country’s economic output. Also society as a whole will benefit if people have an improved sense of personal well-being and increased life expectancy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negative externalities in consumption

A

> In a free market only private benefits are considered so when there are negative externalities in consumption, the good is overconsumed and overpriced - more is consumed and sold at a higher price than is desirable for society.
For each unit consumed between Qm and Q*, the marginal social cost is greater than the marginal social benefit.
The area between the MSC and MSB is the area of welfare loss - the loss to society caused by ignoring externalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Positive externalities in production

A

> In the free market only private costs are considered so when there’s positive externalities in production, there will be underproduction and overpricing - less is produced and sold at a higher price than is desirable for society.
For each unit consumed between Qm and Q*, the MSC is lower than the MSB.
The area between the MSC and MSB is the area of potential welfare gain - the gain to society lost by ignoring externalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What else can cause negative externalities>

A

> A lack of property rights.
The absence of property rights can result in production and consumption externalities, and market failure.
E.g. a factory that emits waste water into a nearby river wouldn’t be held accountable for this pollution if no one had property rights over the river and took responsibility for it.
Extending property rights can result in production and consumption externalities.
E.g. a water company with propoerty rights over a river can allow, charge for, or refuse permission for others to pollute the river.
The absence of property rights generally leads to the overuse (or misuse) of scarce resources, and environmental damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Merit good - definition

A

> A good or service which provides greater social benefits when it’s consumed than private benefits.
Merit goods tend to be underconsumed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Demerit good - definition

A

> A good or service which has greater social costs when it’s consumed than private costs.
Demerit goods tend to be overconsumed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Merit goods

A

> Merit goods are goods whose consumption is regarded as being beneficial to society. They provide benefits to both individuals and society as a whole (due to the positive externalities that result from their consumption), but people are usually unaware of the full benefits that merit goods provide.
Examples = health care, education.
Not all merit goods will be welcomed by all potential customers, and they can be rejected - e.g. the offer of free vaccinations may be refused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Why do merit goods tend to be underconsumed?

A
  1. In the free market the positive externalities that merit goods provide are ignored, and production and consumption will be below the socially optimal level. E.g. producers and consumers won’t consider the wider benefits to society of a good education, such as having a more productive workforce.
  2. Due to imperfect information, consumers don’t always realise the full benefits that merit goods provide. E.g. people might not have enough information on how serious their health problems might be, so their demand for health care isn’t as high as it should be and health care is underprovided.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Demerit goods

A

> Demerit goods are goods whose consumption is regarded as being harmful to the people that consume them, but people are usually unaware (or don’t care) about the harm that demerit goods can cause. Demerit goods also have a harmful effect on society due to the negative externalities that result from their consumption.
Examples = cigarettes, heroin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why do demerit goods tend to be overconsumed?

A
  1. In the free market the negative externalities that demerit goods cause are ignored, and production and consumption will be above the socially optimal level. E.g. producers and consumers won’t consider the wider disadvantages to society of cigarettes, such as smoking-related health issues putting a strain on health care services.
  2. Due to imperfect information, consumers don’t always realise the harm that demerit goods cause. E.g. people might not have enough info on how a harmful drug might affect their health, so their demand is higher than it should be and the drug is overprovided.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Demerit and merit goods - evaluative ideas

A

> Sometimes it’s hard to say which goods should be classified as merit or demerit goods. Whether a good fits into one of these classifications is usually a value judgement - based on people’s opinion and not on economic theory or facts.
E.g. some people consider contraception a merit good, but others don’t.
Not all goods with positive externalities are merit goods, e.g. planting flowers may have positive externalities such as providing pollen for bees or an attractive sight for passers-by, but flower seeds are unlikely to be seen as a merit good whose consumption should be encouraged for the benefit of society.
Not all goods with negative externalities are demerit goods, e.g. driving a car can cause negative externalities (like pollution), but driving a car isn’t seen as being harmful to an individual in the way that taking a drug might be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Market diagram - merit goods

A

> Merit goods generate positive externalities.
If it’s left to the free market then price and Qd of a merit good will be at Pe and Qe respectively, where the MPB curve crosses the MPC/MSC curve. The market equilibrium is below the socially optimal level of consumption (Q1) - where MSC=MSB.
The area ABC is the potential welfare gain lost by underconsuming/underproducing the merit good.
To increase consumption to the socially optimal level of Q1 the gov. could introduce a subsidy to bring the price down to P2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Market diagram - demerit goods

A

> Demerit goods generate negative externalities.
If it’s left to the free market then the price and quantity demanded of a demerit good will be at Pe and Qe respectively, where the MPC/MSC and the MPB curves cross. The market equilibrium is above the socially optimal level of consumption at Q1 - where MSC = MSB.
The area ABC is the welfare loss caused by overconsuming/overproducing the demerit good.
To decrease consumption to the socially optimal level of Q1 the gov. could introduce a tax to bring the price up to P2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Short-term decision making and the consumption of goods

A

> When individuals take a short-term approach to decision-making, it can lead to the underconsumption of merit gods and the overconsumption of demerit goods.
People often only consider the short-term benefits or costs. Individuals can fail t see the need to make provision for the future and for potential changes in their circumstances. A good example of this is paying into an old-age pension.
The long-term private benefits of merit goods are greater than their short-term private benefits and the long-term private costs of demerit goods are greater than their short-term private costs.
The short-term benefits of paying towards a pension (knowledge that you are saving for your old age) are less than the benefits of receiving that pension when you retire.
The short-term costs of buying cigarettes are much less than the long-term costs, e.g. serious smoking related illness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Merit and demerit goods - government intervention

A

> The failure of the free market to supply the socially optimal levels of merit and demerit goods is the main reason why governments intervene to affect their supply.
Governments can directly provide certain goods or services or they can use taxes and subsidies to decrease or increase consumption of certain goods or services to the socially optimal level.
Governments have a lot of information regarding the costs and benefits of goods/services to both individuals and society as a whole, and can use this info to make decision that benefit the whole of society/

29
Q

Public goods

A

> Public goods are goods that are consumed collectively.
An example of a public good could be a flood defence scheme or street lighting.
Public goods have 2 main characteristics:
1. Non-excludability.
2. Non-rivalry/non-diminishability.
Some other examples of public goods include firework displays and lighthouses.
Public goods are also said to be non-rejectable, e.g. you can’t choose to not be protected by the armed forces - they’ll do it anyway.

30
Q

Public goods - non-excludability

A

> People can’t be stopped from consuming the good even if they haven’t paid for it.

31
Q

Public goods - non-rivalry/non-diminishability

A

> One person benefitting from the good doesn’t stop others also benefiting.
This means that public goods have zero marginal cost - there’s no additional cost to extending the good to one more person.

32
Q

Public good - definition

A

> A good which people can’t be stopped from consuming even if they’ve not paid for it, and the consumption of which doesn’t prevent others from benefiting from it (e.g. national defence).

33
Q

Quasi-public good - definition

A

> A good which appears to have the characteristics of a public good, but doesn’t exhibit them fully.

34
Q

Private goods

A

> Private goods are excludable and they exhibit rivalry.
Unlike public goods, people have a choice as to whether to consume private goods.
Most goods are private goods.

35
Q

Quasi-public goods - info

A

> Some goods are pure public goods, e.g. lighthouses. Others can exhibit the characteristics of a public good - but not fully. These are known as non-pure (or quasi) public goods.
New technology can change a good that once had the characteristics of a public good into a private good.
E.g. ‘analogue’ TV has some characteristics of a public good. However, the intervention of digital technology has meant that channels can be encrypted to ensure that if people want a certain channel, they have to pay for it.

36
Q

What does the non-excludability of public goods lead to?

A

> The non-excludability of public goods leads to what’s called the free rider problem.
The free rider problem means that once a public good is provided it’s impossible to stop someone from benefitting from it, even if they haven’t paid towards it.
E.g. a firm providing street cleaning can’t stop a free rider, who has refused to pay from benefiting.

37
Q

Public goods in the market

A

> Public goods are under-provided by the free market.
The non-excludability of public goods leads to what’s called the free rider problem.
The price mechanism can’t work if there are free riders. Consumers won’t choose to pay for a public good that they can get for free because other consumers have paid for it.
If everyone decides to wait and see who will provide and pay for a public good, then it won’t be provided.
It’s also difficult to set a price for public goods because it’s difficult to work out their value to consumers.
Producers will tend to overvalue the benefits of a public good in order to increase the price that they can charge. Consumers will undervalue their benefits to try to get a lower price.
These problems mean that firms are reluctant to supply public goods, and the problems will cause market failure. As a result, governments will usually have to intervene to provide the public good.
Positive externalities are a form of public good. They’re consumed by those who don’t pay for them, so they’re an example of the free rider problem.
No market exists for externalities so they’re an example of a missing market.

38
Q

What else can be seen as a public good?

A

> Some parts of the environment are public goods.

39
Q

Environment - public good

A

> Parts of the environment are often considered to have the characteristics of public goods. E.g. the air is a public good which isn’t bought or sold on a market - it’s non-excludable and non-rivalrous.
Both clean and dirty, polluted air cost the same (i.e. nothing) - so if clean air becomes scarce (from pollution) its price won’t rise and deter people from ‘using it up’ (polluting it).
The non-excludability of clean air leads to the free-rider problem. The benefits of not polluting the air, or cleaning the air afterwards, aren’t restricted to whose who have ‘paid’ for the clean air by choosing not to pollute, or choosing to clean the air. Therefore, in a free market, it’s unlikely that anyone will either choose not to pollute, or to clean up the pollution they make.
This is an example of the economic theory known as ‘tragedy of the commons’ - the idea that people acting in their own best interests will overuse a common resource without considering that this will lead to the depletion or degradation of that resource.

40
Q

Tragedy of the commons

A

> The idea that people acting in their own best interests will overuse a common resource without considering that this will lead to the depletion or degradation of that resource.
The tragedy of the commons can explain a lot of the causes of environmental market failure.
Again, governments will usually have to intervene to prevent the destruction and degradation of common resources.

41
Q

Resource depletion

A

> Resource depletion is the reduction of available natural resources due to their overuse.
Resource degradation occurs when natural resources are made less productive by human activity.
E.g. if land is farmed intensively the soil may become less fertile, which means crops won’t grow as well.

42
Q

Perfect information

A

> In a competitive market it’s assumed that there’s perfect information.
That means that buyers and sellers are assumed to have full knowledge regarding prices, costs, benefits and availability of products.
Perfect information which is equally available to all participants in a market is known as symmetric information.

43
Q

Symmetric information

A

> Everyone has equal and perfect knowledge.
Assuming buyers and sellers are rational in their behaviour, symmetric information will allow the efficient allocation of resources in and between markets.
However, symmetric information rarely exists, e.g. buyers often don’t have the time or resources to obtain full information on prices before buying a product.

44
Q

Asymmetric information

A

> Usually sellers have more information on a product than buyers. E.g. car salesman.
Sometimes buyers may have more information than sellers. E.g. antiques.
When buyers or sellers have more information this is known as asymmetric information, and information is imperfect.
Providers of some services has lack of info because the thing they provide a service for is unpredictable.
Moral hazard is another possible result of asymmetric information. This happens when people take risks because they won’t suffer the consequences themselves if things go wrong. E.g. individual could buy home insurance then behave recklessly (e.g. not locking doors), safe in the knowledge that they’re covered because the insurance provider lacks information about how the individual is acting.

45
Q

What does information failure cause?

A

Market failure

46
Q

Imperfect information - consequences

A

> Imperfect information means that merit goods (e.g. education, health care and pensions) are underconsumed and demerit goods are overconsumed.
There are many reasons why imperfect information affects the consumption of merit and demerit goods. E.g:
-Consumers may not know the full personal benefit of a merit good.
-Consumers may lack the information to decide which good or service is right for them.
-Consumers may not have the information on how harmful a demerit good can be.
Advertising for a demerit good may withhold or ‘gloss over’ any health dangers.

47
Q

Information failure - info

A

> Due to information failure, merit goods tend to be underprovided and demerit goods are overprovided, causing a misallocation of resources and market failure.
There are many reasons why imperfect information affects the provision of merit and demerit goods, e.g:
-Pension providers have a greater knowledge of the pension schemes available than they clients - this can lead to them selling unnecessary schemes or more expensive schemes than may be needed.
-Doctors have a greater knowledge of medicine - they may persuade clients to purchase more expensive care than required.
-Information on a good/service may be too complex to understand. E.g. technical differences between computers.

48
Q

What does an individual’s consumption depend on?

A

> Income and wealth.

49
Q

Income - definition

A

> Income is the amount of money received over a set period of time, e.g. per week or year.
Income can come from many sources - e.g. wages, interest on bank accounts, dividends from shares and rents from properties.
The greater an individual’s income and wealth, the more goods and services they’re able to purchase.

50
Q

Wealth - definition

A

> Wealth is the value in money of assets held - assets can include property, land, money and shares.

51
Q

Income and wealth distribution in a market economy

A

> Many people view differences in income and wealth as unfair, especially if they’re significant.
In economies with high levels of inequality of income and wealth distribution (e.g. Sierra Leone) there can be people who are starving whilst others have very high levels of income and wealth.
Inequality is caused by several things, such as wage differentials, discrimination and regressive taxes.
Generally speaking people who are born into a poor family will remain poor because they won’t have the income and wealth needed to improve their situation.
This is because inequality can lead to differences in access to resources. E.g. people on very low income or wealth may not be able to afford vital resources and services, such as education. As a result, a lack of education may well mean these people will continue to have low income or wealth as they will struggle to get a good job. People with higher income and wealth will be able to afford the best education, and improve their prospects of high income in future.

52
Q

What do some economists argue about the unequal distribution of income and wealth?

A

> Some economists argue that the unequal distribution of income and wealth is a consequence of market failure, because the free market has led to this inequitable distribution of income and wealth/
The market failure is ‘normative’ - it’s based on opinion not fact.
As a result, they say that redistribution of income and wealth would lead to an allocation of resources that would increase the benefit to society, and society’s overall ‘happiness’.
The argument for this is that the benefit to a poor person from an additional £1 of income would be greater than the loss to a rich person who paid an extra £1 in tax.
Inequality is also a cause of market failure. If, for example, some people don’t have the income and wealth to be able to pay for things that they need (such as merit goods) then resources won’t be allocated efficiently.

53
Q

‘Market failure’ caused by inequality

A

> Governments might try to distribute income and wealth more equally.
Correcting this market failure requires government intervention.
The level of redistribution undertaken by governments is a political decision based on value judgements - it’s up to them how much they redistribute income and wealth.
Some people argue that redistributing income reduces the incentive for individuals and firms to work hard. These incentives are needed to encourage efficiency within the market, and not having them may cause greater market failure.

54
Q

Immobile factors of production

A

> An immobile factor of production is one that can’t easily be moved to another area of the economy.
Land is an immobile FoP - it can’t be moved from one location to another. Land can also be immobile because it may only be good for one type of agriculture.
A lot of capital is mobile - it can be moved from one location to another, but some is immobile due to its size or its specialist nature.
Land and capital can become immobile by human action - e.g. a farmer may choose not to change the crops he grows on his land despite changes in climate.

55
Q

Labour immobility

A

> Labour is mobile if workers are able to move from one job to another - this movement could be between occupation or geographical areas so there are 2 types of labour immobility:

  1. Geographical immobility
  2. Occupational immobility
56
Q

Reasons for geographical labour immobility

A
  1. Large house-price, rent and cost-of-living differences between areas can make it very difficult for worker to move location to obtain work.
  2. There may also be high costs involved in moving houses.
  3. A reluctance to leave family and friends.
  4. A dislike of change.
  5. Imperfect information about the jobs available in different areas.
    >The most significant factor in the UK affecting geographical mobility is the high house prices in the South-East - the area of highest employment opportunities.
57
Q

Reasons for occupational labour immobility

A
  1. Lack of training, education and skills required to do a different job.
  2. Lack of required qualifications or required membership of a professional body (e.g. doctors have to be registered with the General Medical Council).
  3. Lack of work experience.
    >Occupational immobility will cause structural unemployment.
58
Q

Consequence of immobile factors of production

A

> Immobile FoP mean there’s often inefficient use of resources - resources are often unused or underused. This inefficiency in the allocation of resources means there’s market failure.
There’s a limit to how much a government can tackle immobile FoP. Governments can’t move land and most of them can’t force workers to relocate.
However, governments can take some action to improve labour immobility. E.g:
-To improve geographical labour immobility governments could offer relocation subsidies or mortgage relief to make moving to a particular area more affordable for workers. Governments could also offer incentives to encourage the construction of housing in areas where it’s needed to provide homes for workers.
To improve occupational mobility governments could provide more training programmes to increase people’s skills.

59
Q

Pure monopoly/monopoly - definition

A

> A pure monopoly is a market with only one supplier.
However, markets with more than one supplier will also be referred to as a monopoly if one supplier dominates the market.

60
Q

Monopoly power - definition

A

> Monopoly power is the ability of a firm to influence the price of a particular good in a market.

61
Q

Monopoly power - info

A

> A firm with monopoly power can control the supply of a good to influence its price - the firm is able to be a ‘price-maker’.
This can happen when there’s a pure monopoly but also in markets where there’s more than one firm.
Firms providing essential goods or services with no substitutes have the greatest monopoly power.
The more inelastic the demand for a product is, the greater the monopoly power tends to be.

62
Q

What do monopolies cause?

A

> Monopolies cause market failure and the misallocation of resources.

63
Q

Monopolies - market failure

A

> In a monopoly situation there’s only one firm in the market so it could misallocate resources by restricting supply to maximise profit.
This is a market failure because it causes a deadweight loss as there are fewer units for consumers to buy/
The area of PcPmKL which would have been part of consumer surplus, is added to the firm’s profits.
By restricting output monopolies can fail to exploit some economies of scale. This means that productive efficiency isn’t achieved and the firm isn’t producing output at the lowest point on its average cost curve.
Monopoly firms can also experience higher costs of production than firms that exist in a competitive market - this can be because monopolies have less of an incentive to innovate to make production methods as efficient (and cost-effective) as possible. They may also have no incentive to cut costs as they’re price makers.
Furthermore, market failure will be caused by the effect monopolies have on consumers. Consumer choice is restricted because there are fewer products to choose from, and monopolies won’t necessarily react to the wants and needs of consumers because they can set their own prices.

64
Q

Monopolies - benefits to the economy

A

> In some markets the most efficient way of allocating resources is to have one producer who is able to exploit economies of scale and achieve productive efficiency.
If the market consisted of lots of small producers they wouldn’t be able to collectively achieve the same level of economies of scale or productive efficiency.
As large firms can exploit large economies of scale, they can pass on these cost savings to their customers, who are able to take advantage of low prices. This will also help their international competitiveness.
Monopolies can use their profits for research into new production methods and products. This could lead to innovation and better products being made available for customers.

65
Q

3 main functions of the environment

A
  1. Provider of resources
  2. Provider of amenities
  3. Absorber of waste
    >Using the environment for these 3 functions can lead to negative externalities in consumption/production and lead to environmental market failure.
66
Q

Resource depletion

A

> Resource depletion is the reduction of available natural resources.
It’s a negative externality - the 3rd party affected is those who can’t use the resources in the future.
Occurs with non-renewable resources.
Also with renewable resources if they are used up faster than they are replaced.

67
Q

Resource degradation

A

> Resource degradation is when a natural resource becomes less productive.
E.g. polluted river = less fish.
Negative externality - 3rd party affected is the people who will use the less productive resource in the future.

68
Q

What does resource depletion and degradation do?

A

> Limits sustainable development.

69
Q

Wealth and environmental impact

A

> The Kuznets curve shows the relationship between environmental damage and the level of wealth in a country.
As per capita income increases the environmental damage also increases until a ‘turning point’ is reached after which environmental damage decreases.
Primary to secondary to tertiary as economy develops.
Unmechanised primary sector - not too bad.
Growth of secondary and mechanisation of agriculture bigger impact.
Tertiary smaller impact as requires fewer natural resources although will have to import. Pollution less in tertiary.
Wealthier inhabitants, ‘green’ legislation.