Section 1: Learning Flashcards
Skinner vs. Pavlov vs. Watson vs. Thorndike
- Skinner:
- Pavlov: focused on links between stimuli and responses which are known as reflexes. An unconditioned reflex involves an US to UR.
Skinner
operant conditioning
Pavlov
classical conditioning, tone and meat powder
Watson
classical conditioning, little Albert, stimulus generalization
Thorndike
law of effect, operant conditioning
classical vs operant conditioning
- classical conditioning: pairing
- operant conditioning: reinforcement
unconditioned vs. conditioned stimulus/response
-unconditioned stimulus (US): universal, everyone responds the same way w/out pairing or learned
-conditioned stimulus: something that has been paired, not everyone will respond in the same way
- conditioned response and unconditioned response are both the same response to a stimulus but unconditioned is stronger response
backward versus standard conditioning
backward conditioning: no pairing (US then NS, dog will never learn to salivate)
standard conditioning: NS then US
stimulus (mediated) generalization vs response generalization
- stimulus generalization classical and operant conditioning, like little albert, generalize from CS to a similar or NS without any pairing required. Albert feared white objects
- response generalization (operant): performing a behavior that is similar but not identical to the one that has been reinforced. Ex. A dog does a trick an dis reinforced with a doggy biscuit, later dog does a diff trick in hopes ot be given a biscuit.
classical vs operant extinction
classical extinction: stop pairing; presenting the conditioned stimulus (CS) without the unconditioned stimulus (US). Present tone without meat powder
Operant extinction: stop reinforcing
spontaneous recovery vs response burst