Section 1 Flashcards

Foundation of Discrete Maths

1
Q

What is a proposition

A

A statement that is either True or False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain ‘P XOR Q’

A

This is similar to an OR statement but excludes the possibility of both being true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain ‘P implies Q’

A

This is true when any of the following occur:
-Both P and Q are true
-Both P and Q are false
-Q is true
An implication is true exactly when the if part is false or the then part is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain ‘P IFF Q’

A

IFF stands for ‘if and only if’. The proposition is only T if both P and Q are false or both are true. This kind of statement also means that P and Q are logically equivalent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the symbolic notation of ‘Not(P)’

A

¬P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the symbolic notation of ‘P and Q’

A

P A Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the symbolic notation of P or Q

A

P V Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the symbolic notation of P implies Q

A

P —> Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the symbolic notation of ‘If P then Q’

A

P —> Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the symbolic notation of ‘P IFF Q’

A

P Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the contrapositive of the implication ‘P implies Q’ and how is it related with the implication?

A

The contrapositive is ‘Not Q implies not P’.

This is just a different way of saying the original implication and they are equivalent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the ‘Converse’ of ‘P implies Q’ and is it equivalent?

A

The converse is ‘Q implies P’

They are not equivalent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of statement is equivalent when you combine an implication and its converse? i.e ‘If I am grumpy, then I am hungry, AND if I am hungry then I am grumpy’

A

This results in the equivalent implication of:

I am grumpy IFF I am hungry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the key concept to remember when dealing with a proposition with a variable in an infinite set?

A

You cant check a claim about an infinite set by checking a finite set of its elements, no matter how large the finite set.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain how this statement reads

(Upside down A)n € N. p(n) is prime:

A
  • Upside down A = ‘For All’
  • N= nonnegative integers
  • €= is a member of
  • For every nonnegative integer n the value of n^2 + n + 41 is prime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can you rewrite a^4+b^4+c^4 = d^4 has no solution when a.b.c.d are positive integers? What is the name of this proposition and is it true?

A
  • (upside down A) a,b,c,d € Z+ . a^4+b^4+c^4 != d^4
  • Z+ is a symbol for positive integers
  • Strings of (upside down A) are combined
  • Euler Conjecture and it is false
17
Q

What is a Predicate

A

A proposition whose truth depends on the value of one or more variables
P(N) = n is a perfect square
DO NOT CONFUSE with: p(n) which is an ordinary function and is a numerical quantity

18
Q

What are some examples of Always True propositions

A
  • For all n, P(n) is true

- P(n) is true for every n

19
Q

What are some examples of Sometimes True propositionis

A

P(n) is true for some n

there exists an n such that p(n) is true

20
Q

What is a universally quantified statement?

A

A sentence that quantifies how often a predicate is true. Specifically an assertion that a predicate is always trye

21
Q

What is an existentially quantified statement

A

An assertion that a predicate is sometimes true

22
Q

How do you notate the following: P(x) is true for all values of x in some set D

A

(upside down A) x €D. P(x)

  • read as ‘For all x in D, P(x) is true.
  • This is a universal quantifier
23
Q

How do you notate P(x) is true for at least one value of x in D?

A

(backward E)x € D. P(x)

  • Read as ‘there exists an x in D such that P(x) is true
  • This is an existential quantifier
24
Q

What does the notation (backward E) stand for

A

There exists…

25
Q

When is it conventional to omit the mention of a non empty set?

A

When all the variables in a formula are understood to take values from the same non empty set it is conventional to omit the mention of the set.

-‘(upside down A) x € D (backwards E) y € D. (Q(x, y)’ is the same as ‘(Upside down A) x(backwards E)y. Q(x, y)’

26
Q

When is a proposition called valid

A

When it evaluates to T no matter what truth values are assigned to the individual propositional variables.

27
Q

Explain how the distributive law applies to P and (Q or R)

A

This is the same as saying (P and Q) or (P and R)

28
Q

When is a proposition satisfiable?

A

If some setting of the variables makes the proposition true