Secret Trust Flashcards
Two types of secret trust
- Fully secret
* Half secret
Secret trusts
Operate dehors the will.
Secret trusts arise
When a testator wishes to benefit someone not mentioned in the will.
Testator to confidant who receives a gift under will for own benefit BUT actually to be held by C for 3rd person who can’t be named in will.
Wills Act 1837: S9
Secret trusts operates ‘dehors the will’ and in contravention of the Act.
As a result of the Act only those identified in a properly executed will shall be entitled to testator’s property.
McCormick v Grogan (1869)
?
Ottaway v Norman (1972)
O left bungalow and contents to Miss Hodge
Done on proviso that she would dispose of property in favour of O’s wife and kids.
H failed to do so and left property by own will to N.
Plaintiff brought actions against H claiming existence of secret trust.
Court held bungalow residuary estate passed to plaintiff as H acquiesced.
Ottaway v Norman - 3 step test for fully secret trust
1) Must be an intention to benefit the claimant - beneficiary.
2) Communication of intention to intended secret trustee.
3) Acceptance by secret trustee of obligation.
Kasperbauer v Griffith (2000)
((
Fully Secret Trust
Not referred to at all in the will with no mention being made in the will as to the reason why the property is being left to that secret trustee.
Often very difficult to prove the existence of a fully secret trust, unless the testator had mentioned the detail of the arrangement to somebody else.
Half secret trust
Existence of trust is mentioned in will but not the terms.
Creating a valid fully secret trust
Ottaway v Norman 1972 3 step test
1) Intention to benefit the claimant-beneficiary.
2) Communication of that intention to the intended secret trustee.
3) Acceptance by the secret trustee of that obligation.
Wallgrave v Tebbs (application of Ottaway)
Wood VC holds that where the secret trust-legatee expressly promises or by silence implies that he is accepting the obligation requested of him by the testator then he will be bound by that obligation.
1) Intention to benefit
Settlor of secret trust must intend that the legal titleholder of property under a will be trustee of that for another.
Re Snowden
McCormick v Grogan
Snowden: elderly woman unsure how to deal with proeprty upon her death, so left proeprty to elder brother with the words ‘he shall known what to do’.
-brother died two days after. Did she impose a secret trust in favour of her niece and nephews.
Megarry held that the deceased woman had only intended to impose a moral obligation on him- therefore the property passed beneficially on the terms of her brothers will.
McCormick: Grogan contracted cholera and in the days leading up to his death he called for McCormick with the words ‘i do not require you to act in accordance with the foregoing instructions but rather I leave it entirely to your judgement to do as you think I would do if I was still living.
Claimant considered himself to be overlooked and sought a declaration that he had a right under a secret trust in certain property.
House of Lords held that the testator had not intended to impose a trust obligation on Grogan.
There was no secret trust under which Grogan could claim a benefit.
Communication of the Secret Trust
Where the settlor intends to create a secret trust it is important that this intention is communicated to the trustee and that the terms of the secret trust are similarlity communicated to her.