Sec 6 (1) C//D/E/F Flashcards

1
Q

Supply class A or class B controlled drug

A

Section (6)(1)(c)

Supply / administer / offer to supply / offer to administer or supply / otherwise deal in
You- Supply def
- Supply case law. R v maginis
OR
- administer def
OR
- offers def
- offers case law - r v during
- offers case law - r v brown
- Supply def
- supply case law r v maginnis
OR
Offers to administer
OR
Otherwise deal in def

Guilty knowledge def
- r v Strawbridge

Any class A or B controlled drug
- def
- class/sched
- useable amount def
- police v Emerali

To any Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Supply includes..

A

Supply includes to distribute, give or sell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Supply def

A

To provide something that is needed or desired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Distribute def

A

Relates to the supply of drugs to multiple people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Giving

A

Involves handing over or transferring to another person for his or her own purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Selling def

A

Quantity or share in a drug is exchanged for a valuable consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Administering def

A

Direct and cause a drug to be taken into the system of another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Offer to supply or administer

The prosecution must prove two things…

A

1: the communication of an offer to supply or administer (actua reus)

2: An intention that the other person believes the offer to be genuine (men’s rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Otherwise deal

A

To barter or exchange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proving possession

4 points

The crown must prove the defendant had;

A

1: Knowledge that the drug existed
2: knowledge it is a controlled drug
3: some degree of control over it
4: an intention to possess the it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Proving intent

Possess for supply

3 points

A

1: admissions
2: circumstantial evidence (cash, tick book, scales, baggies etc)
3: Possession of presumptive amount

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Maginnis

A

Supply/ possession

Supply involves more than the transfer of physical control or custody of the drug, it includes making the drug available for the recipient to use for his/her own purposes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v during

A

Offers

An offer made, by the person charged, that he is ready on request to supply the controlled drugs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v brown

A

Offers

Another made with the intention that it should be understood as genuine is an offence.

The defendant is guilty in the following instances
1: offers to supply drug he has on hand
2: offers to supply drug he will come into possession of at a later date
3: offer to supply drug he mistaking believes he will come into possession of
4: offer to supply drug deceitfully, knowing he will not supply that drug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Strawbridge

A

Guilty knowledge

If there is some evidence the accused honestly believed on inocent grounds the act was innocent he should be acquitted.

It is up to accused to raise this doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

police v Emerali

A

Useable quantity

The quantity of the drug must be more than some useless and minute residue of the drug

17
Q

S 29A ( proving useable quantity)

A

It is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that fact, unless the defendant puts the matter into issue

18
Q

Section 6(6) - Presumption

A

Person will be presumed to have the drug for the purposes outlined in sections 6(1) c/d/e

But

The presumption the drug is for sale and supply may be rebutted if the person is able to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that they did not intend to commit a drug dealing offence.

Eg large amount possession due to heavy personal usage based on addiction and dependency

19
Q

Supply class c drug to person under 18

A

MODA 1975 section 6(1)(d)

Same as 6(1)(c) but includes
- Class C only
- Person is under 18
- r v Forrest and Forrest

20
Q

sells / offers to sell class c controlled drug to person over 18

A

MODA 1975, Section 6(1)(e)

Sell
- Def
- Dealing with controlled drug - def
OR
offers to sell
- offers def
- offers to sell definition
(Does offers case law apply)
- guilty knowledge def
- r v Strawbridge

**Class C Controlled drug **
- def/sched/class
- Usable amount def
- Police v Emerali

**To any person of or over the age of 18 **
- R v Forrest and Forrest

21
Q

Possession of controlled drug for supply

A

Section 6(1)(f)

has in his/her possession
- R v cox
- actual possession v potential possession
- Sec2(2)

any controlled drug
- def/sched/class

**for any of the purposes set out in C/D/E (name which one)
- guilty knowledge
- r v Strawbridge
- useable amount def
- Police v Emerali
- presumptive amount