Search & Seizure Flashcards

1
Q

What is the 4th Amendment?

A

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When does “seizure” of a person occur?

A
  1. When a peace officer physically applies force with the intent to restrain or
  2. When a person voluntarily submits to a peace officer’s authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are additional considerations before the exclusionary rule will be invoked?

A
  1. Was the evidence obtained as a direct result of the illegal police conduct
  2. Would the evidence have been legally discovered anyway
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is “standing?”

A

A defendant must show that the illegal search or seizure, invaded his, or her own personal, reasonable, and legitimate expectation of privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the factors to establish “standing“

A
  1. whether the defendant has a property or possessory interest in the thing seized, or the place searched
  2. whether he has the right to exclude others from that place
  3. whether he has exhibited a subjective expectation that it would remain free from governmental invasion
  4. whether he took normal precautions to maintain his privacy
  5. whether he was legitimately on the premises
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who has “standing” of a car?

A

The owner of a car “almost always” has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car. The driver generally has standing to challenge a trunk search, whereas a passenger normally does not. If a car is stolen, neither the driver, nor the passenger has standing to a search of the car. The lessee of a rental car does have standing. Even a driver who is not on the rental car agreement, but otherwise is in lawful possession and control of the rental car has standing to challenge the search of the car.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does an employee have an expectation of privacy on a work computer?

A

There is no reasonable, expectation of privacy in a work computer, subject to monitoring, an Internet use, firewall, and a prohibition against personal use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the “good faith“ claim?

A

The courts will look to whether a “reasonably well-trained officer would have known that the search was illegal” in light of all the circumstances. The inquiry looks to the objective facts only, which can include a particular officers, knowledge and experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the exclusionary rule?

A

The purpose of the exclusionary rule is “to deter, deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct, or in some circumstances, recurring or systemic negligence.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a “consensual encounter?”

A

A contact between an officer and an individual that is strictly voluntary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can a police officer approach an individual in a public place, identify themselves as law-enforcement, and in a non-coercive manner, ask the individual a few questions without reasonable suspicion?

A

As long as a reasonable person would feel free to disregard the police and go about his or her business, the encounter is consensual, and no reasonable suspicion is required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can a police officer ask a person for identification during a consensual encounter?

A

Yes. The law is clear that questions regarding identity, and a request for identification are allowed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a “knock and talk?”

A

A knock and talk is a consensual encounter that takes place at the doorway of a home. It is a situation where you knock politely at a reasonable hour, without any type of badgering or compulsion. persistent, loud, knocking, a demand to open the door, or any other coercive circumstance, can turn a knock and talk into a detention. If the contact remains consensual, officers may request permission to enter, or search the residence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What about Officer safety concerns during a consensual encounter?

A

You may always do whatever is reasonable to protect yourself, even during a consensual encounter. Even ordering a person to keep his hands in sight, or to remove them from his pockets, will not necessarily convert a consensual encounter into a detention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the definition of a “detention?”

A

A “detention” occurs whenever a reasonable person would believe he is not free to leave or otherwise disregard the police and go about his business. It may result from an officer’s use of force, physical restraint, unequivocal verbal commands, or words or conduct that clearly relate to the investigation of specific criminal acts.

The application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain, is a seizure, even if the person does not submit, and is not subdued.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the purpose of a detention?

A

The purpose of a detention is to resolve whether suspicious behavior is “innocent” or relates to crime.

17
Q

What is “reasonable suspicion?”

A

For an investigative stop or detention to be valid, you must have “reasonable that:

  1. Criminal activity may be afoot and
  2. The person you are about to detain is connected with that possible criminal activity

Both the quality and quantity of the information you need is considerably less than the “probable cause“ you need to arrest or search.

18
Q

How is “reasonable suspicion” evaluated?

A

It is evaluated based on objective facts. You must have specific facts justifying your suspicion, and you must be able to articulate these to a court. Based on the “totality of circumstances“ including your training and experience, were enough to make your suspicion objectively reasonable.

19
Q

Can you ask for permission to conduct a search during a consensual encounter?

A

Yes. You may ask for permission to conduct a search during a consensual encounter. However, you have no authority to conduct a search unless the person gives you voluntary consent, or is subject to a search clause.

20
Q

What are some specific factors for reasonable suspicion?

A
  1. Nighttime/high crime area. Will not suffice alone to justify attention needs to be in combination with one or more other suspicious factors.
  2. race/racial or identity profiling race and personal characteristics are proper factors to consider if they are included as part of a description of a specific suspect.
  3. Flight if you yell stop or freeze, display a weapon, or assert your authority in some other manner, they’re still cannot be a detention, unless the suspect stops flame. However, if you apply physical force that indicates intent to restrain, then a seizure has occurred, even if the suspect fleas capture.
  4. Your experience rely on your training/experience
  5. Officer safety.
  6. Suspected weapons. A police officer may conduct a limited search for firearms if they reasonably conclude that the person detained may be armed and dangerous to the officer or others
  7. Information from others. I witness, victim, LE, dispatch. BOL’s are not considered reliable.
  8. Anonymous tips. Be cautious about turning the contact into a detention unless you observe, suspicious circumstances or obtain consent unless there is sufficient corroboration or other indications of the tips, reliability
  9. 911 calls. * can rely on information reported in a 911 call in forming reasonable suspicion for a detention.*