SEARCH AND SEIZURE PERSONS Flashcards

1
Q

According to the fourth amendment both the United States and the California constitutions prohibit what

A

Both the sea United States in California Constitution prohibits unreasonable search and seizures of people houses and personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The right of people to be secure in their houses person’s papers and effects against unreasonable search and seizures shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue but upon what supported by oath or affirmation

A

Probable cause is used to support the oath or affirmation particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When does a search occur according to the fourth amendment

A

Search occurs when a government officer or infringes upon an expectation of privacy that society considers reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does a seizure of property occur?

A

A seizure of property occurs when there were some meaningful interference with an individual possessory interest in that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When does a seizure of a person occur 2 circumstances

A

He seizure of the person occurs one when I peace officer physically applies for us to win a person voluntarily submit to the officer authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is the fourth amendment consider violated

A

Fourth amendment is not violated unless a legitimate expectation of privacy is infringed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does the fourth amendment mandate that police upsers act flawlessly?

A

The fourth amendment does not mandate that police officer’s at flawlessly but only that they act reasonably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Regarding the exclusionary rule what must a defendant prove to bring the motion to court to challenge a search or seizure of an item

A

The defendant must prove that he had standing to bring the motion by proving a sufficient privacy interest in the place search or the item seized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Based on evidence presented at a suppression hearing the court must make what determination?

A

The court must decide whether the officer was acting reasonable or unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule?

A

The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter improper police conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two additional considerations before the exclusionary rule will be invoked?

A

First is whether the evidence was obtained as a result of exploitation of the illegal police conduct

second is whether the evidence would have been legally discovered anyway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does the exclusionary rule apply to evidence of criminal conduct or testimony of an officers observations of criminal conduct during an unlawful detention?

A

The exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence of criminal conduct or testimony of an officers observation of criminal conduct during unlawful detention the person detained illegally is not immunized from prosecution for any crime committed during the illegal detention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the exclusionary rule apply to criminal and civil actions?

A

The exclusionary rule applies to criminal actions it extends to civil proceedings only where the proceedings so closely identified with criminal proceedings that they are quasi criminal in nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did proposition 8 exclude?

A

Proposition eight eliminated California’s independent state grounds as a basis for excluding evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

According to proposition eight when is evidence admissible in court?

A

Evidence is admissible in court as long as the police do not violate the fourth ,sixth ,or 14th amendment when obtaining evidence or the constitutionally base procedures in Maranda.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

According to proposition eight are or sworn peace officers obliged to uphold California’s independent rights?

A

Yes

17
Q

What must a defendant established to move a case for suppression of evidence?

A

A defendant must establish standing to move for the suppression of evidence

18
Q

What is “Standing”?

A

“Standing” is more accurately viewed as a question of privacy means that a defendant my show the illegal search and seizure invaded his or her own personal reasonable and legitimate expectation of privacy

19
Q

Is a defendant entitled to claim another persons Maranda fifth or sixth amendment rights were violated?

A

No, A defendant is not entitled to claim that some other persons Maranda fifth or sixth amendment rights were violated

20
Q

Who bears the burden to show a legitimate expectation of privacy regarding standing

A

The defendant bears the burden of showing a legitimate expectation of privacy

21
Q

If a defendant admits ownership and later changes his story at trial what is the risk for the defendant?

A

The defendant risks being impeached by his earlier testimony

22
Q

What are the factors to be considered regarding establishing standing?

A

Number one whether the defendant has a property or possessory interest in the things siezed or place searched.
Number two: whether he has the right to exclude others from that place
Number three: whether he has exhibited a subjective expectation that it would remain free from governmental invasion
Number 4: whether he took normal precautions to maintain privacy
Number 5: whether he was legitimately on the premises.

23
Q

Does a person who is merely present in a hotel room that is rented to another have standing to question the validity of the police entry?

A

No a person who is merely present blacks standing to question the validity of the police entry.

24
Q

Does a person who has rented a room with a stolen credit card have standing to contest entry by police including compliance with Knockin notice?

A

A person who has rented a room with a stolen credit card lax standing to contest entry.

25
Q

Doesn’t owner who is absent at the time his home is searched have sufficient privacy interest to a certain knock a notice violation?

A

Answer: yes