Search and Seizure Flashcards

1
Q

Exclusionary Rule

A

evidence obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure are not admissible in court

Weeks v. U.S. (1914) & Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Search

Katz v. United States (1967)

A

A place may be protected from 4th Amendment searches if:
* a person exhibits an actual expectation of privacy
* the expectation is one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

U.S. v. White (1971)

A

An informant/undercover agent may simultaneously record thier conversations with a defendant using electronic equipment on their person; or carry radio equipment that transmits to recording equipment elseqhere or to other agents without violating the 4th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Smith v. Maryland (1979)

3rd-Party Doctrine

A

A person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information voluntarily given to a 3rd party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

U.S. v. Place (1983)

Dog sniffs!

A

Dog sniffs don’t violate the 4th Amendment search protections because it is a limited disclosure of the contents of luggage

disclosure is only of the presence or absence of illegal substance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Illinois v. Caballes (2005)

A

Official conduct that doesn’t compromise any legitimate interest in privacy isn’t a serach; government conduct that only reveals the possession of contraband doesn’t compromise legitimate privacy interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hester v. United States (1924)

Open fields? Curtilage?

A

Open fields doctrine provides that police entry of an open field doesn’t implicate the 4th Amendment; no constitutional protection of open fields

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is an open field?

Hester v. United States (1924)

A

includes any unocccupied or undeveloped area outside of the curtilage and the home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is curtilage?

Hester v. U.S. (1924)

A

Land that extends from the sancityt of the home to the immediate land surrounding and associated with the home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the factors used to determine whether land is curtilage?

U.S. v. Dunn (1987)

A
  • Proximity of area claimed to be curtilage to the home
  • whether an area is included in an enclosure surrounding the home
  • nature of the use of the area and steps taken by resident to protect the area from observation by passersby
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is the use of aerial surveillance to secure information in a defendant’s yard a violation of the 4th Amendment?

California v. Ciraolo (1986)

A

No, because the airspace above the home is publicly navigable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can police search trash left outside for pick up?

California v. Greenwood (1988)

A

Yes. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in trash left outside of the curtilage for pickup.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kyllo v. U.S. (2001)

A

When police use a device that isn’t in general public use to explore the details fo the home that would’ve previously been unknowable without physical intrusion, the surveillance is a search and presumpively unreasonable without a warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

U.S. v. Jones (2012)

A

Where there is a physical intrusion of a constitutionally protected area, there is a lesser burden on the defendant to show a reasonable expectation of privacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When is information given to third-parties protected by the 4th Amendment?

Carpenter v. U.S. (2018); three-part test

A
  • the records obtained are only available because of digital technology;
  • records were created without meaningful voluntary choice by the user;
  • records tend to reveal the privacies of life.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Carpenter v. U.S. (2018)

A

There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in thier physical movements as captured through cell-site location information.

17
Q

What are the three categories of seizable items?

A
  1. Contraband
  2. fruit of a crime
  3. mere evidence
18
Q

Contraband

A

evidence that a private party may not lawfully possess

19
Q

fruit of a crime

A

instrumentalities used in the commission of an offense

20
Q

Mere evidence

A

evidence that will aid in a partiuclar apprehension or conviction

21
Q

U.S. v. Karo (1984)

A

a seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interferences iwth an individual’s possessory interests in that property.

22
Q

What 4 questions should you ask when approaching a 4th Amendment problem?

A
  1. Was there a search or seizure? (Was the search or seizure conducted by a government actor?)
  2. Was there probable cause?
  3. Was there a valid warrant? (Was the warrant defective or did the police act in bad faith?)
  4. Was there an exception to the warrant requirement?