Search Flashcards

1
Q

Why is this the most controversial of police powers

A

a search is a significant violation of someone’s rights to be searched or have their property searched, thus, must be balance against the individuals rights are freedoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

As a preliminary point what was decided in the case of Jackson v Stevenson

A

that an officer may not search someone to try to find grounds for arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which S of PACE provides powers for officers to stop anyone in certain circumstances and then search them

A

S 1-3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In which case was it ruled unlawful for an officer to search without giving the suspect his name and the name of his police station

A

Osman v DPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which Act and S allows for the search of a controlled substance

A

The Misuse of Drugs Act, s 23

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does S 60(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act allow for

A

an inspector to authorise stop and search powers in a locality for 24 hours if he has reasonable grounds to believe serious violence may take place, this allows any officer to stop anyone without reasonable suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which act allows for suspect terrorists to be S&S

A

Terrorism Act 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which S provides that a constable may stop and search someone whom he reasonably suspects to be a terrorist to discover evidence on the person.

A

S 43(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Gillian v UK rule

A

that said s 44-47 was not complaint with the ECHR. The result was s 47A which provides that (1) a senior officer may give authorisation in a specified area if there is a reasonable belief of (a) an impending act of terror and (b) necessity in an area no greater than necessary for a time no longer than necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is reasonable suspicion for S&S

A

a police officer may only S&S if they have reasonable grounds to believe that person is in possession of, or believe that person is in possession of, stolen goods, prohibited articles, offensive weapons, or tools to commit a burglary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does Code A set out in regard to reasonable suspicion

A

clarification on what amounts or doest amount to reasonable suspicion: based on iteliggence, can come from the behaviour of the suspect, cannot be based on personal characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is the situation where the police can stop and search based on appearance

A

when there is a distinctive identification such as a gang tattoo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does S 54 allow

A

for search of detainees upon their arrival at a police station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which S authorises intimate searches

A

S 55

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which S allows for warrants to be applied for and issued by a Justice of the police to allow for a search

A

S 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two different types of warrant that can be applied for

A

specific premises warrant, where police know a particular address they want to search’ and all premises warrants, where the police do not know all of the addresses of the suspect.

17
Q

What was held in R (Redknapp) v Commissioners of the City of London Police

A

Redknapp was aquitted on the grounds that the Justices were not rigouros in their application of S 8 as they did not investigate whether sufficient information had been supplied. This rendered the search unlawful.

18
Q

Where are the safeguards on warrants found

A

S 15 attempts to ensure the fairness

19
Q

What was decided in R v CC Lancashire, ex p Parker

A

it was ruled unlawful to only to bring part of the original warrant to a search.

20
Q

What was decided in R (Van de Pil) v Crown Court of Kingston

A

it was unlawful to not specify the name of a known occupier.

21
Q

What was decided in DPP v Meadon

A

it was acceptance for the police to put all the occupants of a house in a clean room before proceeding to search the rest of a house; an assault on an officer managing was upheld.

22
Q

What are excluded materials

A

according to s 9-14 of PACE are medical records, journalistic material and legal material

23
Q

When will police be able to seize excluded material

A

with the permission of a circuit judge under Sch 1 of PACE

24
Q

Where are the general powers of seizure found

A

S 19

25
Q

Which S allows for finger printing with consent

A

s 61, but if under 14 a parent must given consent

26
Q

when is consent not required to take finger prints

A

where a person’s name is not known or where the person has been arrested and detained for a recordable offence, or convicted of a recordable offence

27
Q

Which S of PACE provides for the DNA samples to be take with consent

A

S 62-65

28
Q

what type of samples may be taken without consent where there is detention, charge or a conviction

A

non-intimate including mouth swabs

29
Q

when can non-intimate samples be taken without consent

A

if authorised by a superintendent of above who has reasonable grounds for believing that the sample will confirm/disprove the suspects involvement and reasonable force may be used to take them

30
Q

If a superindtented authorises an intimate search who must conduct it

A

a doctor or a nurse

31
Q

When may an intimate sample be taken

A

with the suspects consent in writing, thus the suspect can refuse consent but a court or a jary may draw its own inferences to a refusal.

32
Q

What was held in S & M v UK

A

The ECHR held that the indefinite detneiton of DNA samples of people not convicted was a breach of art 8 of the EconHR

33
Q

What was enacted as a result of the decision in S & Marper v UK

A

Protection of Freedom Act 2012, the time limit for the retention of fingerprints and DNA for a person neither charged or convicted is 3 years unless the suspect has a previous conviction for a recordable offence. Under these circumstances information may be kept indefinitly.

34
Q

What does S 177 provide for

A

General power applying to the police to use reasonable force when they exercise any of the powers under PACE.