SDA Flashcards

1
Q

What is the philosophical problem associated with SDA?

A
  • Whether the mind and body are one of the SAME nature ( a monist/materialist view) or different natures (dualist view)
    -What happens when a person dies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the dualistic view

A
  • Dualists believe that there are two aspects to a human being - physical body and non physical soul (self/psyche)
  • The non-physical aspect of the body goes on to experience ‘eternal life’ after physical life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe the monist/materialist view

A
  • Human beings are made of one substance which is the physical body
  • They believe in human beings being made up of matter - one substance
  • A person’s identity is inextricably linked to their physical body so when they die their life ends
  • They are likely to reject LAD as without a physical form ‘life’ cannot be supported
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe plato’s beliefs about the soul/body after death

A
  • Plato was a dualist
  • the soul is immaterial and the real self that has lived before - its real home is the world of the forms and it is trapped in a physical body
  • The physical body belongs to the world of senses, the should belongs to the world of the forms
  • It is pre-existent and immortal
  • We come back during our next life as something better/worse depending on how we behaved in this life, until we fulfil our potential and reach heavenes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe Aristotle’s beliefs about the soul/body after death

A
  • Humans are made up of two things: body (matter) and soul (form)
  • the soul is an integral part of the body
  • You cannot have one without the other - the should animates the body, by organising a potential living body into an actual living body - aquinas took on these ideas. we live and think and that is what makes us humans
  • The soul is the essence of a human being which gives us life and it is an essence which is distinct from but also inseparable from the material body
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who was Descartes and what did he try to establish?

A
  • he was a substance dualist, who believed the should is a distinctly separate substance from the body
  • He argued mind and body are separate substances with distinguished properties - matter/extended substance, vs mind/metnal substance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe what Descartes meant by ‘I think therefore I am’

A
  • reflects his certainty about the existence of a thinking mind
  • He believed that even though everything else could be doubted/questioned, the existence of the thinking self was undeniable proof of his existence as a conscious being
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe what Descartes said about the Pineal gland

A
  • The small portion of the brain that lies between the two hemispheres
  • He considered this to be the point at which the mind controlled the body
  • God facilitated this interaction
  • His suggestion doesn’t work because locating mind-body interaction anywhere int he brain doesn’t solve anything
  • It doesn’t tell us how, it merely states - it interacts here
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe descartes’ belief about animal souls

A
  • distinguished between animal and human souls
  • he ebleievd animals were complex machines lacking rational souls and humans possessed rational should capable of consciousness, thought and self awarenessq
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe descartes’ beleifs about the immortality of the soul

A
  • the human soul is immortal and can exist independently of the body after death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe descartes’ argument from doubt about the existence of the soul

A
  • He began by doubting everuthign he could possibly doubt.
  • He realised he could doubt the existence of the external world, his body and god, but not his thinking self - the mind
  • This led him to conclude: ‘ I thinl therefore I am’ - the very act of doubting required a thinkign mind, so the mind/soul is distinct from the body
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe descartes’ argument from clear and distinct ideas about the existence of the soul

A
  • some ideas a re clear and distinct - so self evident that they can’t be false
  • he argued that the idea of the mind as a thinking, non-material substance was clear and distinct, whilst the idea of the body was a separate, distinct idea
  • since the mind and the body had different natures, Descartes reasoned that they must be distinct substances - the mind is non material and possesses the property of thought, whereas the Body is material and lacks the capacity for thought - therefore, the mind and the body are two separate substances with the mind being the essence of the soul
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe descartes’ argument from divisibility about the existence of the soul

A
  • physical susbtances like the body could be divided into smaller parts, the soul cannot
  • ## because they have different properties he contented they must be distinct substances distinct from each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe Hume’s criticisms of descartes

A
  • the whole idea of a substance is confused - Hume stated that Descartes’ argument that the should emerged from a conscious substance doesn’t solve anything and instead raises the question of how a substance can think - the response that a substance can think because the soul is a thinking substance was to Hume a circular argument
  • Thinking cannot tell us what is actually the case: the cause of thought could actually be a material substances
  • The logic of descartes only establishes that there is thinking, rather than that there is an ‘I’ who thinks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe Gilbert Ryle’s criticism of descartes

A
  • ridiculed it, calling it the ‘ghost in the machine’
  • We should not expect to find a mind over and above various elements/components of the body - university analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe physicalism

A
  • The philosophical idea that everything can be explained in terms of matter and so the soul is not needed to describe the nature of a person
  • For a physicalist, there is no body soul relationship because there is no soul
  • It is a reductive philosophy - the mind can be reduced to the brain, which is subject to physical decay - eg dementia
  • Therefore experience is related to physical causes and science can provide all answers
17
Q

Describe how physicalist theories criticise Descartes mind-body dualism

A
  • if mental substance is different to physical substance there is no way in which they can interact
  • Physicalist theories make an obvious but valid point that if there are no physical bodies there are no minds as minds are fundamentally linked to matter
  • There is no affect that mind-altering drink and drugs affect the way that the mind thinks
18
Q

Give the strengths of dualism

A
  • Matter doesn’t exclusively control our minds, but our minds control our bodies - therefore its still considered by many to be true today
  • Still the most popular religious approach to the mind
  • Compatible with conventional religious thought - eg christians believe we have souls that survive the death
  • evidence fo dualism in near death experiences
19
Q

Describe the Qualia argument

A
  • to refer to qualia is to ask ‘what is it like’ , which is a subjective and personal question
  • Eg Wittgenstein said that ‘when describing the smell of a cup of coffee’, nobody could experience that smell by hearing a description of it
  • This suggests qualia have to be experienced, push back neurological states of the brain as we cannot fully explain what they are and they must be personally experienced
  • this is known as the hard problem of consciousness - consciousness implies dualism exists in some form
20
Q

Describe Thomas Nagel’s argument - what is it like to be a bat

A
  • All mammals have conscious experiences in different ways which are unimaginable to us - that organism cannot be reduced to a physical description of its functional states so in the same way no functionalist theory can explain qualia in purely physical terms
21
Q

Define dual-aspect monism

A

Fundamental reality is a single substance with mental and physical aspect

22
Q

Describe D.A.M

A
  • One aspect (mind) is first person subjective awareness, so is the perception of consciousness. If we take qualia we cannot know their subjective feeling