SCOTUS Flashcards
What does SCOTUS stand for
Supreme Court of the United States
How do you become a Supreme Court justice?
- president will nominate
- senate will confirm you
What’s the nature of the Supreme Court
- 9 members
- jobs for life
Who is on the current Supreme Court?
-Bush senior noms: Clarence Thomas (repub)
- Bush jr noms: John Roberts (chief justice), Samuel Alito (repubs)
Obama: Sonia sotomayor,
Elena Kagan (dems)
Trump: Brett kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Amy coney (repubs)
Biden: Brown Jackson (dem)
6-3
What does the make up of the Supreme Court suggest
- that it is politicised, although it claims it isn’t,
- Judges are seen to be ideological blocs (7 repubs, 2 dems)
- contrasts with the Uk
Who is head of the Supreme Court? G
John Robert’s, took over in 2005
- Q on the Supreme Court which include John Roberts means events in SC post 2005
What’s the role of the Supreme Court
- the judicial branch, key in the seperation of powers, set out in construction article 3
What’s the history of the Supreme Court
- 1789, founding fathers passed the federal judiciary act
- initially consisted of 5 justices with 1 chief
What’s the structure of the federal court system
- sits at the top of the US court
- rejects almost all cases brought to it
- only 4% of cases get heard
Why might the Supreme Court be independent
- justices appointed for life
- vacancies occur only if a justice dies, retires or is impeached
- constitution means salary cannot be lowered in their term
- judges are nominated by president, and approved by
- the ABA (American bar association) approves of nominations by doing background checks
What is the supreme courts only power
-Judicial review, power to review laws or actions of congress and president, judging whether they are constitutional.
- power isn’t mentioned in constitution but is granted because of cases such as Marburg vs Madison 1810
What’s an example of judicial review in practise
- all they need is a simple majority
- Dobbs v Jackson 2022, overturned roe v wade 1973, deeming abortion right is unconstitutional
- Brown v Board of education 1954 segregation in schools deemed unconstitutional
Why is judicial power of Supreme Court a good thing
- critical check on legislative and executive branches
- ensure constitution is upheld
- safeguards individual rights
Why is power of the Supreme Court a bad thing
- it’s not in the constitution
- too much power in hands of judiciary, May push their own agendas instead of the people
Judges are unelected, undemocratic - president appointees, will be loyal to president
What is the election process of becoming a Supreme Court justice?
- vacancy arises, eg: Ginsburg died 2020, replaced by Barret
-presidential nomination, eg: Brett
-ABA rating eg: despite allegations v kavanaugh he was approved - senate judiciary committee hearings: eg: democrats boycotted vote on Barret, resulting in 12-0 vote
- senate vote eg: Bork rejected in 1987 by a 42-58 vote
What might the president consider when nominating a judicial nominee
- judicial experience, this could be why Harriet miners faced criticism in 2005 as she lacked experience as a judge. ABA rates candidates for ‘well qualified’, ‘qualified’ ‘unqualified’
- The outgoing justice, president may be expected to replace with a like-for-like basis, however alito, Barret, kavanaugh didn’t replace on a like-for-like basis
- the ideology of the nominee: president may want a justice who has a similar political ideology to their own
Why is the length of the process in appointing a Supreme Court justice important
- length of the process: if vacancy is caused by a retiree, it will remain on the court until the vacancy is filled, usually taking 2-3 months. Length also ensures candidates are thoroughly checked.
Eg: obamas executive order for DAPA was truck down as it was 4-4 as a justice had died, had he been able to appoint Gorlund, his policy could have been saved
Eg: Harriet miers withdrawal shows how important experience as a judge is
Why is politicisation of the process in appointing a Supreme Court justice important
- constitution recognised important of an independent Supreme Court, but with presidents nominating them process is politicised.
Eg: Trump 3 appointments in his 2017-2021 tenure shows this
Eg: however this may not always be case, Reagan nomination Kennedy was balenced, despite radians conservative values
What are the roles of media and pressure groups in politicising the appointment process
- huge media backlash to appointment of kavanaugh because of allegations against him
- donors give pressure groups money to support appointments, eg: Judicial crisis network were donated 10 mil to support appointment of gorsuch
- role of ABA can be questioned, has no constitutional standing
What impact can the Supreme Court have on the public
- rulings from the Supreme Court allows existing policy to continue, removes a policy, or in some cases will create a policy
What’s an example of a Supreme Court ruling creating new policy
- citizens united v FEC 2010 - allowed for the development of super-PAC, which would have previously been impossible because of the Bipartisan campaign reform act
What’s an example of the Supreme Court upholding legislation or policy
- court ruled in favour of Obamacare in 2 healthcare cases allowing the continued enforcement of this legislation
What is a constitutional right
- rights explicitly identified within the constitution and amendments
How effective is rights protection
- what May protect the rights of someone May infringe the rights of another
- obergefell v Hodge’s 2015 protected rights of LGBTQ+ community, but infringed the rights of religious people
- court only hears about 1% of cases per year, so people who’s rights are encrusted may not feel they are protected as majority are notheard by the supreme Court