SCOTUS Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

National Federation of Independent Business NFIB v Sebelius (2012)

A

Ruled ACA was constitutional as Congress has the right to raise taxes. Robert’s sided with 4 loose constructionists in 5-4 decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

National federation of Idependant business NFIB v Sebelius (2012). R/A, limits, U/R/E?

A

Restraint as it looked at right of Congress
Limited federal gov
Upheld decision of Congress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Trump v Hawaii (2018)

A

Upheld Trump executive order of Muslim travel ban in 5-4 decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Trump v Hawaii (2018), R/A, limits, U/R/E

A

Activism looked at what FF would have wanted
Limited executive orders and President
Upheld power of President and executive orders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt (2016)

A

Struck down Texas law proving limit of abortion at 5-3 decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt (2016) R/A, limits, U/R/E

A

Restraint- not extending power of judges
Limits states power
Upheld previous convention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

US v Texas (2016)

A

Texas +25 other states challenged DAPA as President overstepping his mark. 4-4 tie but DAPA was struck down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

US v Texas (2016) R/A, limits, U/R/N

A

Activism with judges going behind their power
Limited power of President
Removed an executive order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Citizens United v FED (2010) & McCutcheon v FEC (2014)

A

Citizens United found 5-4 decision of corporations being able to donate as much as they want with Super Pacts and raise unlimited money
McCutcheon removed limits to number of campaigns that could be donated to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

US v Windsor

A

Court rules 5-4 that Defence of Marriage Act is 1996 was unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Obergefell v Hodges (2015)

A

Established same sex marriage under the equal protection of the law under 14th amendment. 5-4 decision rely on swing vote of Kennedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DC v Heller (2008)

A

Second amendment guarantess

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Allen v Milligan (2023)

A

Found Alabamas redistricting unconstitutional and gerrymandering. 5-4 found violation of Sec 2 of VRA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Shelby County v Holder (2013)

A

5-4 vote that section 4(b) of the VRA was unconstitutional and allowed states to implement stricter voter ID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dobbs v Jackson (2022)

A

Overturned Roe v Wade (1973) that made it so all states had to give rights to abortion. States could now reverse any reaction not set out under federal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bucklew v Precyth (2019)

A

Found that under amendment 8 even if someone was to suffer from a condition that would make typically quick deaths painful they are not excluded under ‘cruel and unusual punishment’

17
Q

Salinas v Texas (2013)

A

Found that under certain circumstances silence can be used as an admission of guilt

18
Q

Miranda v Arizona (1966)

A

5-4 vote that you cannot be denied the right to remain silent and every suspect of a crime must be able to read their rights and if not the evidence must be dismissed in court

19
Q

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v Bruen (2022)

A

Protected 2nd amendment right to carry concealed and loaded handguns

20
Q

McDonald v Chicago (2010)

A

Followed DC v Heller and ruled right to be lead arms is fundamentally protected in the Constitution

21
Q

Creative LLC v Elenis (2023)

A

Graphic design owner fought for rights to not only refuse service to same-sex couples but to open display this fact which went against the Colorado Anti Discrimination Act
Found this was unconstitutional and so with 6-3 decision Colorado could not stop a business from denying service on religious ground

22
Q

Burwell v Hobby Lobby stores (2014)

A

5-4 SC decision unconstitutional that ACA required family-owned businesses to pay for health insurance

23
Q

Burwell v Hobby Lobby stores (2014) R/A, limited, U/R/E

A

Restraint on what the first amendment means
Limited Congress and what it could pass
Upheld previous session of Citizens United

24
Q

Allen v Milligan (2023) R/A, limit, U/R/E

A

Active with finding a new interpretation of the Constitution
Limited states rights on how they can redistrict
Established new policy on redistricting

25
Q

Shelby County v Holder (2013) R/A, limit, U/R/E

A

Restraint what Founding Fathers would want
Limited federal governments for preventing voter ID laws
Established policy

26
Q

Dobbs v Jackson (2022) R/A, limit, U/R/E

A

Restraint to look into wants of the Founding Fathers
Limited the power of the federal government while giving state governments more power
Removed previous decisions of the SC

27
Q

Bucklew v Precythe (2019) R/A, limits, U/R/E

A

Active in looking at what it could be now
No other branches of were involved
Upheld the 8th amendment

28
Q

Miranda v Arizona (1966) R/A, limits, U/R/E

A

Restraint to looking at what the Founding Fathers wanted
Limited courts ability to find suspects guilty
Established new policy on fifth amendment

29
Q

Kennedy v Bremerton School District (2022)

A

Joseph Kennedy prayed publically after every American football match, with school concerns over the separation of church and state and did not renew contract
Found that separation did not cover public praying and ordered the school to renew his contract

30
Q

Carson v Making (2022)

A

6-3 decision in Maine’s school vouchers not being allowed with religious schools and said it violates the Free Exchange Clause as discrimination to religiously backed private schools

31
Q

Snyder v Phelps (2011)

A

Snyder’s father sued the WBC for defamation and 8-1 decision found that speech on a public street cannot be the basis of liability.