Schizophrenia - The Psychological Explanations for Schizophrenia and therapy treatments Flashcards
What are the psychological explanations for schizophrenia?
- Family dysfunction explanations suggest that schizophrenia is due to family experiences of interpersonal conflict, communication problems, criticism and control:
- Schizophrenogenic mother
- Double-bind theory
- Expressed emotion - Cognitive explanations:
Dysfunctional thought processing (produces hallucinations and delusion)
1) Family dysfunction theories - Schizophrenogenic mother
Tienari (2004) / Fromm-Reichmann (1948):
- Mother is cold, controlling and rejecting; father is often passive
- Leads to excessive stress and distrust as the family climate is characterised by tension and secrecy.
- This triggers psychotic thinking and paranoid delusions, and ultimately schizophrenia
1) Family dysfunction theories - Double-bind theory
Bateson et al (1956):
- The child receives mixed messages and cannot do the right thing - when they get it wrong, they are punished with a withdrawal of love.
- Leads to understanding the world as confusing and dangerous.
- This triggers disorganised thinking and paranoid delusions, and ultimately schizophrenia
1) Family dysfunction - Expressed emotion
Kavanagh (1992):
- The family shows exaggerated involvement in the life of the patient (including needless self-sacrifice) control, verbal criticism of the patient (occasionally including violence) and hostility towards the patient (including anger and rejection)
- Leads to excessive stress beyond impaired coping mechanisms.
- This triggers relapse in patients with schizophrenia and may trigger the onset in a person who is already vulnerable due to their genetic make-up (diathesis-stress model)
2) Cognitive approach to explaining schizophrenia - Dysfunctional thought processing
- A cognitive explanation of schizophrenia suggests that it is due to abnormal information processing.
- Dysfunctional thought processing = cognitive habits or beliefs that cause the individual to evaluate information inappropriately and produces undesirable consequences
- Frith et al. (1992) identified two kinds of dysfunctional thought processing that could underlie some symptoms of schizophrenia - central control and metarepresentation
2) Dysfunctional thought processing - Frith on meta-representation
Metarepresentation – is the cognitive ability to reflect on thoughts and behaviour which allows us insight into our own intentions and goals.
- Dysfunction in this would disrupt our ability to recognise our own actions and thoughts as being carried out by ourselves rather than someone else. This explains auditory hallucinations and delusions like ‘thought insertion’.
2) Dysfunctional thought processing - Central Control
Central control – is the cognitive ability to suppress automatic responses while we perform deliberate actions instead.
- Dysfunction in this would lead to disorganised speech and thought disorder as we are unable to suppress automatic thoughts and speech triggered by other thoughts.
- For example, schizophrenics tend to experience derailment of thoughts and spoken sentences, because each word triggers associations and the patient can’t suppress automatic responses to them.
Evaluation of the psychological explanations of schizophrenia - supporting evidence
1) Stirling et al (2006) compared 30 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia with 18 non-patient controls on a range of cognitive tasks, including the Stroop test. Patients took over twice as long to name the ink colours in the schizophrenic group
- This provides external validity for the cognitive explanations, in particular the central control aspect.
2) Garety et al (2008) estimated that relapse rates for individuals who receive family therapy as 25% compared to 50% for those who receive standard care alone
- Provides external validity for family dysfunction theories as it suggests the targeted area of the therapy has an influence on relapse
3) CBTp (cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis) has been demonstrated to be effective in the NICE review for treatments of schizophrenia (2014) when compared to antipsychotic medication, CBTp as more effective in reducing symptoms severity and improving levels of social functioning
- Real-world applications and external validity for the explanations as therapy is effective, so what it is targeting is likely the cause or one of them (cognitive)
Evaluation of the psychological explanations of schizophrenia - Weaknesses
1) Historically, family-based explanations have led to parent-blaming; parents who have already suffered seeing their child descend into schizophrenia and who bear lifelong responsibility of their care, feel responsible for their child’s illness which can cause stress and anxiety - out-dated views that were once accepted are no longer tolerated by families and are now seen as destructive rather than productive
- Social sensitivity of the theory makes it unethical as a theory as without suitable causative evidence it is unfair to blame family dysfunction
2) Altorfer et al (1998) found that 1/4 of the patients they studied showed no physiological responses to stressful comments from relatives
- This is undermining evidence for the family dysfunction theories, showing a lack external validity for these theories - in particular the expressed emotion theory
Evaluation of the psychological explanation of schizophrenia - weakness and strength
1) Although there is plenty of evidence to support the broad principle that poor childhood experiences in the family are associated with adult schizophrenia, there is almost none to support the importance of the schizophrenogenic mother or double-bind. Berger (1965) found that schizophrenics reported a higher recall of double bind statements by their mothers than non-schizophrenics. Other research is less supportive, Liem (1974) found no difference in parental communication in families with a schizophrenic child and ‘normal’ families
- There is external validity for the schizophrenogenic mother theory but there is also contradicting evidence, suggesting an intersection of causes for schizophrenia and the family dysfunction theory cannot fully explain schizophrenia
Psychological treatments for schizophrenia - targeting dysfunctional thought patterns with CBTp
- CBTp aims to help patients to identify irrational thoughts and challenge them (including the origin of ‘voices’) and reality testing them to reduce distress.
- It usually takes place for 5-20 sessions, with NICE recommending at least 16 sessions.
- CBTp uses the ABCDE model. It involves identifying activating events (A) and the resulting beliefs (B) from these events that appear to cause their emotional and behavioural consequences (C). These beliefs can then be rationalised, disputed (D) and changed through critical collaborative analysis, leading to the effect (E) of restructured beliefs.
- Critical collaborative analysis – the therapist uses gentle questioning to help the patient to understand and challenge illogical deductions and conclusions e.g. ‘if your voices are real, why can no one else hear them?’
- Rather than ‘getting rid’ of schizophrenia, CBTp helps patients to cope better with their symptoms because it reduces distress.
- CBTp also uses normalisation. The therapist shares with the patient that many people have unusual experiences such as hallucinations and delusions in many different circumstances. This reduces anxiety and the sense of isolation by making the patient feel less alienated and stigmatised. This makes the possibility of recovery seem more likely.
- Patients may also be set behavioural assignments to improve their general level of functioning, such as to shower everyday or to go out and socialise with friends once between now and the next session.
Evidence for CBTp’s use in treating schizophrenia
1) A recent NICE (2014) review o treatments for schizophrenia found consistent evidence that it was an effective form of therapy - CBT was effective in reducing symptom severity with some improvements in social functioning
- However, most studies have included patients who were taking antipsychotics at the same time as undergoing CBTp, making it hard to assess effectiveness
2) Juni et al (2001) concluded that there was clear evidence that trials with weak methodologies lead to biased findings regarding the effectiveness of CBTp - meta analyses for example don’t take into account the quality of each study. Some don’t randomly allocate participants to control and test groups, for example.
- Problems such as these are overlooked in meta-analysis, which is concerning as Wykes et al (2008) found that the more rigorous the study, the weaker the effect of CBTp
Evaluation of CBTp as a treatment of schizophrenia - Strengths
1) Evidence to support the benefits of CBTp for schizophrenia - The NICE review found consistent evidence that when compared with standard care (antipsychotics alone), CBTp was effective in reduction rehospitalization rates up to 18 months following the end of treatment - CBTp was also shown to be effective in reducing symptom severity and improving social functioning
- However, most studies on the effectiveness of CBTp have been conducted with patients treated at the same time with anti-psychotic medication, and so it is therefore difficult to assess it’s effectiveness independent of antipsychotics - there is modest support for it but it may be more effective as a long-term therapy as it provides strategies for patients they can use to manage systems beyond therapy
2) CBTp only aims to make schizophrenia more manageable and improve patients’ quality of life as it allows patients to make sense of and challenge some of their symptoms through critical collaborative analysis
- Whilst it is worth doing, it does not cure schizophrenia - it provides patients with strategies to manage their symptoms and improves quality of life
Evaluation of CBTp as a treatment for schizophrenia - Weaknesses
1) CBTp is difficult to assess - Despite being recommended by NICE as a treatment for people with schizophrenia, it is estimated only 1 in 10 people in the UK who could benefit from CBTp can get access to it - Haddock et al (2013) found that in NW England, only 6.9% of patients had been offered CBTp
- This limits the effectiveness of the treatment as patients are unable to participate in the therapy - of those who are offered CBTp, a significant number either refuse or fail to attend the therapy sessions, thus limiting its effectiveness even more
2) CBTp requires motivation that patients may not have - the length of the therapy means that patients have to be motivated and committed to multiple sessions - the therapy itself also requires self-awareness and a willingness to engage with the process
- However, the positive symptoms of schizophrenia lead to a lack of awareness and negative symptoms cause a reluctance or inability to engage - the length of the therapy also leads patients to drop out at times of severe episodes - overall, this suggests that CBTp may not be an appropriate treatment for all schizophrenics
Evaluation of CBTp as a treatment for schizophrenia - Weaknesses cont.
3) CBTp raises ethical issues - CBTp may involve, for example, challenging a person’s paranoia, which can be seen as interfering with freedom of thought
- If for example, CBTp challenged a patient’s belief in a highly controlling government, this could easily stray into modifying their political beliefs and this is a weakness of CBTp as a treatment for schizophrenia
4) CBTp may be more effective at certain stages of the disorder - Addington and Addington (2005) claim that self-reflection is not particularly appropriate during the initial acute phase of schizophrenia - following stabilisation of psychotic symptoms with antipsychotics, individuals may then benefit more from group based CBTp.
- This can help to normalise their experience by meeting others with similar issues, as research has found those with more experience of schizophrenia and a greater realisation of their symptoms benefit more from individual CBTp - this suggests that CBTp is more effective but may be more appropriate in the latter stages of treatment rather than initially