Schedule P Flashcards
What information does Schedule P Provide
- Detailed underlying Loss & LAE Reserves from Balance Sheet
- Includes 10 Years of Loss & DCC
What is a common reason for outside Parties to refer to a Company’s Schedule P
to evaluate company’s reserve adequacy
How many parts comprise Schedule P
7
How is Schedule P Data segmented
by line of business and AY
Identify the common uses of Schedule-P and the applicable part from Schedule P
D: Development of reserves over time, attributable to specific years and lobs (2,3,4)
T: Trends in Frequency & Severity (1,2,5)
R: Calculate RBC Loss Sensitive Discounts (part 7)
A: Evaluate adequacy of recorded reserves (2,5)
P: Determine payment patterns for discounting (part 3)
I: Observer difference b/w Actuarial Reserves (IBRN) and Case Reserves (4,5)
D: Disclosures for the SAO (Statement of Actuarial Opinion) (Part 1)
Identify the contents of each part of schedule P
Part 1: Everything (Premiums, losses, LAE, discounts)
Part2: Incurred Net Losses
Part 3: Net Cumulative Paid Loses
Part 4: IBNR
Part 5: Claim Counts (Closed with Pay, outstanding, reported)
Part 6: Earned Premium
Part 7: Tables and Triangles for Loss Sensitive Discounts
identify the Schedule P yearly reporting convention for: Medical Professional Liability (Claims-Made)
report year
identify the Schedule P yearly reporting convention for: Commercial Auto Liability/Medical(Occurrence)
Accident year
identify the Schedule P yearly reporting convention for: Products Liability (Tail Coverage)
policy year
how would you calculate average case outstanding severity using Schedule P
average case oustanding severity
= [ (Schedule P, Part 2) – (Schedule P, Part 3) – (Schedule P, Part 4) ] / (Schedule P, Part 5, Section 2)
= (Ultimate – Paid – IBNR) / (Outstanding claim count)
explain how average case outstanding severity affects an adequacy of reserves
changes in average case O/S may indicate strengthening or weakening of case reserves
why should you be cautious when using Schedule P - Part 5 to compare companies (3)
Schedule P - Part 5 shows claims counts
- Schedule P doesn’t indicate whether counts are recorded on a ‘per-claim’ or ‘per-claimant’ basis
- definition of closed claim can vary
- a commutation may distort the count triangles
identify cautions or limitations when using Schedule P to assess reserve adequacy
talk to people!
- numbers don’t tell the whole story – must also talk to management
- EXAMPLE: Sched P is net of reinsurance and doesn’t reflect credit risk
10
- maximum # of years of data carried in Schedule P exhibits
- long-tailed lines need external data to estimate tail factors
pooling
[1] internal pooling can distort data
[2] participation in voluntary/involuntary pools distort data (many pools report IBNR as case)
commutations
- can cause a sudden increase in net reserves
DCC
- Schedule P, Parts 2,3,4 include DCC
- can’t separate DCC trends from loss trends
preparation of Schedule P
- allows choice in allocations & presentations
identify changes in a company’s business to consider when using Schedule P to assess reserve adequacy
examiner’s report required 3 of these:
- mix of business
- reserving practices
- claim settlement practices
- growth/shrinkage
- retentions
- limits
- intercompany pooling
- definition of claim count
- commutations