schaffer's stages of attachment Flashcards
asocial
- birth to 2 months
- shows similar responses to objects and people
- preference for faces/eyes at the end of the stage
indiscriminate
- 2 to 6 months
- preference for human over non human company
- can distinguish between different people but are comforted indiscriminately and show no stranger anxiety
discriminate (specific)
- 7 to 12 months
- preference for one caregiver
- show stranger and separation anxiety
- look to protection from and show joy upon reunion with their primary caregiver
multiple
- 1 year onwards
- attachment behaviours are displayed towards multiple people
- form in the first month after the primary attachment is formed
- the number developed depends on the social circle the infant is exposed to
schaffer and emerson (1964) - aim
examine the formation of early attachments
schaffer and emerson (1964) - methods
- observed 60 babies (31 male and 29 female) from glaswegian working class families ages 5-23 weeks old
- researchers visited them in their homes every month for the first 12, then again at 18 months
- interviewed the mothers and observed children in relation to stranger and separation anxiety in daily activities
schaffer and emerson (1964) - results
- at 25-32 weeks, 50% showed separation anxiety towards mothers
- by 40 weeks, 80% had a discriminate attachment and 30% had began to form multiple attachments
schaffer and emerson (1964) - conclusion
- supports schaffers stages of attachment
- suggests attachment develops through a series of stages across the first year of life
give a strength of schaffer and emerson
1/3
their research has high external validity. they conducted the observations in each childs own home, this natural environment means that both the children and their parents were more likely to act naturally. therefore the results and any conclusions drawn are likely to be applicable to other children from a similar demographic in their own homes, highlighting the study’s high external validity
give a strength of schaffer and emerson
2/3
the study has real world applications for daycare. for example, if a child is in the asocial or indiscriminate stage of attachment, childcare would be useful for them as they display low stranger and separation anxiety. however if the child is in the discriminate attachment stage childcare would be less effective for them. therefore, research increasing the understanding of attachment stages can help to plan and improve daycare
give a strength of schaffer and emerson
3/3
they used a longitudinal research design, in which they collected data over a long period of time. observing these children regularly over 18 months can help to eliminate individual differences as an extraneous variable. this therefore increases the internal validity of results, as we can be sure that findings are the result of the childs attachment style and not another confounding variable
give a limitation of schaffer and emerson
1/2
their study lacks population validity due to their biased sample of 60 working class mothers and babies from glasgow. these mothers may form different attachments with their infants compared to wealthier families or ones from different cultures. we are therefore unable to generalise this study’s results to mothers and babies in the rest of the world.
give a limitation of schaffer and emerson
2/2
criticised for the possibility of social desirability bias. schaffer and emerson interviewed mothers about their own children, some of them may have reported inaccurate information in order to appear like better mothers with children with secure attachments. this may lead to a bias in the results, reducing the internal validity of the study since we cannot conclude that natural behaviour was recorded about the infants stages of attachment
the role of the father
- traditionally fathers would work to provide resources and mothers cared for the children
- some psychologists say men aren’t equipped to form an attachment, they point to bio evidence suggesting that their lack of oestrogen (which underlies caring behaviour) is why they can’t form a close attachment
- other argue that men take the role of a playmate rather than a caregiver
- others argue fathers can display sensitive responsiveness and respond to their child’s needs so can form a strong emotional bond
give a strength of the role of the father
1/2
research supports the role of the father as a playmate rather than a caregiver. geiger (1996) found a fathers play interactions were more exciting and the mothers were more affectionate and nurturing. this suggests that the role of the father is in fact as a playmate and not as a sensitive parent responding to their childs needs.