Schaffer’s Stages Of Attachment Flashcards
1
Q
Schaffer and Emerson’s research
A
Observational study of the formation of early infant-adult attachment
2
Q
Specific Attachment
A
- between 25 and 32 weeks of age about 50% of babies showed signs of separation anxiety towards a specific adult (usually mother)
- attachment tended to be towards the caregiver who was most responsive to the infant’s signals and facial expressions (reciprocity).
- attachment did not depended on who fed the child
3
Q
Multiple Attachments
A
- by the age of 40 weeks, 80% of babies had a specific attachment and almost 30% displayed multiple attachments
4
Q
Stage 1: Asocial
A
- usually lasts between 6-8 weeks after birth
- no discrimination between humans
- preference for humans over non-humans
- babies now have a preference over different expletive
- prefer familiar people
- baby forms bonds with certain people
5
Q
Stage 2: Indiscriminate attachment
A
- from 8 weeks-7months
- can tell people apart
- stronger bonds start to grow with familiar adults
- no fear of strangers
- more obvious and observable social behaviours
- recognise and prefer familiar people
- usually accept cuddles and comfort from any person (indiscriminate)
- don’t show separation anxiety when caregivers leave
- don’t show stranger anxiety in the presence of unfamiliar people
6
Q
Stage 3: Specific Aattachment
A
- usually develops around 7 months old
- strong displays of separation anxiety
- distress in the company of strangers
- specific attachment has been formed to a ‘primary attachment figure’
- this is the person who offers the most interaction and responds to the baby’s signals with the most skill.
In 60% of cases this is the baby’s mother.
7
Q
Stage 4: Multiple Attachments
A
- from around 10 months old
- attachment with primary carers
- increased interest in developing bonds with others
- these relationships are called secondary attachments
- 29% of the children formed secondary attachments within a month of forming a primary attachment
8
Q
Good external validity
A
- most of the observations (apart from stranger anxiety) were made by parents during ordinary activities and then reported to the researchers
- if the researchers were making the observations then this could have distracted them or made them feel more anxious
- therefore it is likely that the babies behave naturally whilst being observed
9
Q
Strength of Schaffer and Emerson’s research
A
- they compared the mother’s self-report with observations of the baby’s behaviour while they visited them at home (for example, when the mother left the room)
- They found that the interview data matched their observations 92% of the time
10
Q
Temporal Validity
A
The extent we can generalise results to other times in history eg Today
11
Q
Problems with temporal validity
A
- Parental care of children has changed wince the 1960s.
- Many more women go out to work so children care cared for outside of the home.
- Research shows that fathers staying at home to care for children has quadrupled since 1960s.
- We cannot conclude that stages of attachment would be the same today.
12
Q
Collectivist cultures
A
- Focus on the group
- Value obedience and ‘interdependence’
- Share possessions and child care
- Expect multiple attachments to be more common
13
Q
Individualist cultures
A
- Focus on the individual
- Value independence
Each person is more concerned with their own needs or the needs of the immediate family group.
14
Q
The research suffers from cultural bias
A
- The theory suggests that the stages are inflexible EG- that it is normal for single attachments to come before multiple attachments
- However, in other collectivist cultures, multiple attachments may be formed from the outset. This suggests that the stage model applies only to individualist cultures.
- Cultural bias occurs if the stage theory becomes a standard by which other cultures are urged and they may consequently be classed as abnormal.
15
Q
Counterpoint to good external validity
A
- There are many issues when asking the mothers to be the observer.
- They are unlikely to be objective observers
- They might have been biased in what they observed/reported.
- They might not have noticed signs or misremembered them.
- Therefore, even if the babies behaved naturally, their behaviour may not have been recorded accurately.