schachter and singer Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

two-factor theory of emotion

A

Both physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation are necessary. Pretty much means that when people become aroused they look for cues as to why they feel the way they do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

type of experiment

A

A lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how were the participants observed

A

through a one-way mirror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

participants

A

184 male college students came for extra credit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IV & DV

A

IV:
1. The info about the adrenalin given to the subjects
2. The situation (euphoria or anger)
DV: Participants emotional state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

participants state

A
  1. Epinephrine Informed (Epi Inf)
  2. Epinephrine Ignorant (Epi Ign)
  3. Epinephrine Misinformed (Epi Mis)
  4. Placebo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

situation 2

A
  1. The stooge acted friendly and started to play with the items in the room. Stooge encouraged the participant to join him. (Euphoria)
  2. Stooge acted angry (because of the questionnaire) and ripped up his paper. (Anger)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

condition (7)

A

Epi Ign– (1)euphoria and (2)anger
Epi Inf– (3) euphoria and (4)anger
Placebo– (5)euphoria and (6)anger
Epi Mis– (7) euphoria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

euphoria results

A

Misinformed felt the happiest

Ignorant came in second

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

anger reults

A

Ignorant felt the angriest
Placebo came in second
(more susceptive to the stooge because they had no explanation of why their bodies felt as they did)
The informed were least angry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

weaknesses

A
  1. Lacked ecological validity
  2. Bad sample (all male, all students, approximately the same age)
  3. Questioned on ethical ground (injecting people with adrenaline without consent)
  4. Results weren’t impressive
  5. 5 subjects were excluded because they may have found out what the study was about
  6. No assessment of subjects mood before injection (maybe they were extremely happy or exceptionally angry)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

strengths

A
  1. Amount of control in their procedure

2. Large number of participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly