Sceptical Publications: John Webster - 1677 Flashcards

1
Q

Who was he?

A

He was a doctor and a preacher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did he study and where?

A

Before 1632, he studied chemistry and medicine at Gresham College.
This is where he became interested in the scientific method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was his job during the Civil War?

A

He was a chaplain and surgeon for the Parliamentary army.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What had he done by 1648?

A

He had left the Church of England to become a non-conformist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

After the Civil War, what did he do?

A

He preached at Yorkshire churches and debated publicly about the role of universities and astrology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why did he give up preaching for medicine?

A

In 1658, the Republican govt seized his books as his religion didn’t conform to that of the govt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When did he complete his book?

A

He completed it in 1673 but didn’t publish it until 1677.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who was his attitude similar to?

A

Thomas Ady.

Beliefs not founded in the Bible should be rejected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why did he write this book?

A

It was written in response to people claiming that the hunts were legitimate.

  • Intended to rebuff Glanvill who claimed that the Demon Drummer was genuine.
  • Opposed Meric Casaubon (leading intellectual after Restoration) who defended the view that witchcraft was genuine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the central belief he espoused?

A

Witches existed with NO supernatural powers.

They did evil but without the Devil’s help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case was he critical of?

A

He was critical of the Demon Drummer case and blamed Mompesson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did he have to say about the Pendle Swindle?

A

He claims that Robinson was instructed to lie by his father.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What evidence does he have for his comments on the Pendle Swindle?

A

He met with Edmund Robinson.
The first time he met him, Webster was stopped from talking to him by two men.
The second time was in public: Webster asked him and the boy was ushered away by two men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was his book called?

A

‘The Displaying of Supposed Witchcraft’, 1677

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

He cited the case of Roland Jenks from 1577, but what actually was this?

A

Jenks went to prison in Oxford for selling Catholic books.
He allegedly uttered a curse at the trial - hundreds (incl 2 judges) died. This was most likely a typhus outbreak.
Webster blames Jenks but says it wasn’t maleficium - he claims natural poisons.
All harm done by witches can be ascribed to natural causes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

All ____ done by witches can be ascribed to ______ _____.

A

All harm done by witches can be ascribed to natural causes.

17
Q

Was his work popular or rejected?

A

It was well received and Webster engaged in public debates through pamphlets.

18
Q

Was he respected or not?

A

He was taken seriously by many members of the Royal Society and he wrote on chemistry.

19
Q

What did he do that was reflective of the time he was writing in?

A

His methodical approach was reflective of the new scientific age.

20
Q

What gave webster credibility?

A

His thorough use of evidence, including some first hand evidence.
This set him apart from other sceptical authors.

21
Q

Why does Trevor Roper believe he had little impact?

A

The origins of his work can be found in the works of Weyer and Scot - discourse had not progressed.
There was a decline because the clergy had much less power in Protestant countries.

22
Q

What shows his significance, however?

A
  1. He was taken seriously by the Royal Society. It was they who published his book instead of Glanvill’s.
  2. He dismissed maleficium and diabolism - witches had no supernatural powers, and harm attributed to witches had natural causes.