SC cases civil rights Flashcards

1
Q

Burwell v Hobby Lobby stores 2014

A

ACA required business to pay for contraception but part was struck down
5-4 ideological split

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Snyder v Phelps 2011

A

Snyder sued WBC for picketing his sons funeral and deformation
8-1 ruling in favour of freedom os speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Carson v Makin 2022

A

Limits of school vouchers offered by the state of Maine which had disallowed vouchers to be used for religious private schools
6-3 ideological split in favour of using it for religious schooling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Kennedy v Bremerton School District 2022

A

High school sports coach praying in the middle of games, school refused him a new contract
Ideological split on sc ruling that school board was unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Creative LLC v Elenis 2023

A

Graphic designer wanted to exclude same sex couples from his works, Colorado gov ruled that he couldn’t
6-3 decision in favour of designer on religious grounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

McDonald v Chicago 2010

A

Right to bear arms is protected by the 2nd amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

NY state rifle and Pistol association v Bruen 2022

A

Right to carry concealed and loaded handguns in pubic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Miranda v Arizona 1966

A

Confessed to rape as didn’t know had right to silence
5-4 ruling that police had to read out their rights on arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Salinas v Texas 2013

A

Questioned in a non custodial situation, police took his silence as admission of guilt
Court agreed that silence in these circumstances didn’t violate the 5th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bucklew v Precythe 2019

A

Convicted of murder and argued that rare medical condition would subject him to a more painful death
5-4 split along ideological lines giving him the death sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dobbs v Jackson 2022

A

Overturned Roe v Wade decision to give abortion rights to women
6-3 reversed lower court rulings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Shelby County v Holder 2013

A

Federal practices of allowing states to choose individual voting rules
5-4 split on allowing states to set their own regulations for voting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Allen v Milligan 2023

A

Alabama redistricting plan to prevent black population to have votes
5-4 split to overturn Alabama decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Burwell v Hobby Lobby stores 2014 notes

A

Activism - ruled against federal gov Religious Freedom Restoration Act 1993
Limiting power of the federal gov
Remove policy of central gov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Snyder v Phelps 2011 notes

A

Restraint - took no active stance
upholding policy set out in 1st amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Carson v Makin 2022 notes

A

Active - going against decision made by state, forced to allow religious schooling
limits on state gov
removing, and establishing new policy

17
Q

Kennedy v Bremerton School District 2022 notes

A

Active - setting a new precedent fo how to interpret
Limiting powers of individual states
establishing new policy of how to interpret establishment clause

18
Q

Creative LLC v Elenis 2023 notes

A

Active - going against state gov
reducing powers of state government
removal of policy

19
Q

McDonald v Chicago 2010 notes

A

Restraint - upholding previous laws
upholding 2nd amendment

20
Q

NY state rifle and Pistol association v Burden 2022 notes

A

Active - removing powers of central gov
limiting power of federal gov
removal of policy

21
Q

Miranda v Arizona 1966 notes

A

active - establishing new policy of how to arrest people
establishing new policy of people’s rights

22
Q

Salinas v Texas 2013 notes

A

active - established new precedent
established new policy of how to interpret rights

23
Q

Bucklew v Precythe 2019 notes

A

Restraint - didn’t change anything
upholding policy from 8th amendment

24
Q

Dobbs v Jackson 2022 notes

A

active - removing previous SC decision, highly controversial
giving power back to states
removing roe v wade

25
Q

Shelby county v Holder 2013 notes

A

Active - changing previous policies
gives more power to individual states
removing parts of 1965 voting right act

26
Q

Allen v Milligan 2023 notes

A

Restraint - deferred to precedent set out to previously
limits to power of states
upholding policy