SAQ CLOA Flashcards

1
Q

What was the aim of Glanzer and Cunitz’s (1966) study?

A

To test the hypothesis that STM and LTM are two separate stores in a free recall experiment

STM: Short-Term Memory, LTM: Long-Term Memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What methodology did Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) use in their study?

A

46 army enlisted men, repeated measures design, 15 one-syllable words shown for 1 second with 2-second intervals

Participants were tested under three conditions: immediate recall, delayed recall (10 seconds), and delayed recall (30 seconds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the results of Glanzer and Cunitz’s (1966) study regarding the recency effect?

A

Primary and recency effects were shown in immediate recall, significant reduction in recency effect in 10-second delay, no trace in 30-second delay

The recency effect refers to better recall of the most recent items.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the aim of Landry and Bartling’s (2011) study?

A

To test the working memory model

The study focused on articulatory suppression and its effect on recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the results of Landry and Bartling’s (2011) study?

A

Experimental group scored lower (45%) than control group (76%)

Articulatory suppression prevented rehearsal in the phonological loop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the aim of Bartlett’s (1932) study?

A

To investigate how social schemas affect the recall of a story

The study involved a Native American folktale called ‘War of the Ghosts’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What three patterns of distortion did Bartlett (1932) find?

A
  • Assimilation
  • Leveling
  • Sharpening

These patterns describe how participants altered the original story based on their cultural schemas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the aim of Brewer and Treyens’ (1981) study?

A

To investigate the role of schema in encoding and retrieval of episodic memory

Participants were asked to recall objects in an office-like room.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Brewer and Treyens (1981) find regarding schema and recall?

A

Participants recalled items congruent with their office schema more often than incongruent items

Items like a toy top and skull were less frequently recalled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the aim of Loftus and Palmer’s (1974) study?

A

To investigate whether leading questions affect speed estimation

Participants watched a car crash video and answered questions with varying critical verbs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the speed estimations based on different critical verbs in Loftus and Palmer’s (1974) study?

A
  • ‘smashed’: 40.8 mph
  • ‘collided’: 39.3 mph
  • ‘bumped’: 38.1 mph
  • ‘hit’: 34 mph
  • ‘contacted’: 31.8 mph

The verb used influenced participants’ mental representation of the accident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the aim of Loftus and Pickrell’s (1995) study?

A

To determine if false memories of autobiographical events can be created through suggestion

Participants were asked to recall memories, including a false one about being lost in a mall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What percentage of participants recalled the false memory in Loftus and Pickrell’s (1995) study?

A

25% recalled the false memory

Participants were generally less confident about the false memory compared to true memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the aim of Tversky and Kahneman’s (1974) study on anchoring bias?

A

To demonstrate how anchoring bias affected students when solving a math problem

The study involved two conditions: ascending and descending sequences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the median predictions for the ascending and descending conditions in Tversky and Kahneman’s (1974) study?

A
  • Ascending Condition: 512
  • Descending Condition: 2250

The actual answer was 40320.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the aim of Kahneman’s (1993) peak-end rule study?

A

To investigate the effect of the end of an experience on recollection

Participants experienced two conditions involving cold water.

17
Q

What did participants in Kahneman’s (1993) study prefer?

A

The majority chose the second condition despite both conditions having the same duration in freezing water

This preference was based on the more favorable ending of the second condition.

18
Q

What was the aim of Strack and Mussweiler’s (1997) study on anchoring bias?

A

To investigate how the anchoring effect influenced guesses of Mahatma Gandhi’s age when he died

Participants were asked leading questions with different anchor points.

19
Q

What were the average guesses for Gandhi’s age in Strack and Mussweiler’s (1997) study based on conditions?

A
  • Higher condition: 67 years
  • Lower condition: 50 years

The differing anchor points significantly affected participants’ estimates.

20
Q

What was the aim of Brown and Kulik’s (1977) study?

A

To investigate whether surprising and personally significant events can cause flashbulb memories

The study focused on events like the deaths of public figures.

21
Q

What percentage of participants had detailed memories of loved ones’ deaths in Brown and Kulik’s (1977) study?

A

90%

The study highlighted the role of personal relevance in memory retention.

22
Q

What was the aim of Neisser and Harsch’s (1992) study?

A

To determine whether flashbulb memories were susceptible to distortion

Participants recalled memories of the Challenger disaster.

23
Q

What did Neisser and Harsch’s (1992) study reveal about memory recall over time?

A

Discrepancies were found between original answers and answers given 2.5 years later

Most participants remained confident in their recall despite these discrepancies.