Sample Size And Study Power Flashcards
What is the purpose of a power calculation?
It helps you choose a sample size such that if the new drug truly is substantially better, we would be fairly certain of getting a significant result
What are the two different approaches to sample size calculations?
- Precision approach
2. Power approach
When is a precision approach used for study size calculations?
If the study aim is to obtain a prevalence estimate (or other estimate) and 95% CI
You need a rough guess of the prevalence and an idea of how precise or narrow you want the confidence interval to be
When would you need more people in your sample for a precision approach?
- If the prevalence is closer to 0.5 (50%)
- if you want a narrower confidence interval
e.g.
Prevalence of 8% and want to estimate within 2% of truth (with 95% confidence) = need 706 people
Prevalence of 10% and want to estimate within 2% = need 864 ppl
Prevalence of 10% and want to estimate within 1% = need 3445 ppl
When is a power approach used for sample size calculations? What do you need to know?
If the study aim is to carry out a statistical test to compare two groups
You need to know:
- a rough guess of the prevalence (% with outcome) in baseline group
- Minimum difference/effect you want to be able to detect
- Set the probability of Type I error (usually 5%)
- Set the probability of Type II error (1 minus this = study power). Power is the prob of detecting an effect as significant if it really exists (usually 80-90% used)
When would you need more people in your sample for a power approach?
When you want to detect a smaller difference between the groups, want a smaller significance level, want greater power or if the population prevalence is closer to 0.5
E.g.
Prevalence 4% in women. Want to detect difference of 2% higher in men with 90% power and at 5% sig level = 2600 in each group
Same as above but with 80% power = 1960 in each group
What are some general points for study size calculations?
- Only rough estimates
- Try different scenarios
- Increase sample size to allow for non-response/drop out
- matching (case control study) can increase power
- can do it for unequal sized groups
Does a non-significant result mean no true effect?
Not necessarily - may be that the sample size is too small
Research papers should always provide details of the power/sample size calculations in the methods section but this isn’t always the case
What are the downsides of recruiting too many or too few participants?
Too many = waste of resources
Too few = may fail to detect important effect and estimates of the effect may be too imprecise (wide CIs)