Samlet spørgsmål Flashcards
GTY: Nævn de tre grundlæggende tilgange til forhandling
Sv:
- Hard Position
- Soft Position
- principled negotiation Position
GTY: Hvorfor er de to typiske positioner i en forhandling ikke efficient, for nogle parter?
Sv:
- Den er meget tidskrævende
- man indblander sig ego, idet man ikke vil tabe ansigt overfor modpart.
- Fører ofte til konflikt, og bitterhed
- Fordi vigtigste parameter er vilje.
- Der kan være mange nederlag forud for et kompromis.
GTY: Hvad er de fire grundlæggende punkter i “principled negotiation” positionen?
Sv:
• People: separate the people from the problem
- Interests: Focus on interests, not positions
- Options: invent multiple options looking for mutual gains before deciding what to do.
- Criteria insist that the result be based on some objective standard.
Hvad står BATNA for?
Sv:
‘Best Alternative To A Negotiated Agreement
Beskriv BATNA tankegangen:
Sv:
-BATNAs may be developed for any situation that calls for negotiations, from negotiating a pay hike to resolving complex conflicts.
Simple three-step process for determining BATNA: Develop a list of actions to take if no agreement is reached; convert the more promising ideas into practical options; and tentatively select the option that seems best.
Beskriv hvad der menes med ZOPA?
Sv:
Zopa er “Zone of possible aggrements”
Det er i det interval hvor du vil være “tilfreds” med en forhandling. Det er forskellen på din reservation price, og modpartens reservation price.
NG: Hvilke steps går forud for en forhandling?
Sv: • Asses Your BATNA • Calculate your reservation price • Asses the other party´s BATNA • Calculate the other party´s reservation price • Evaluate the Zopa - The Zopa is the “Zone of possible agreements” the difference between seller reservation price and Buyer reservation price. • Search for information
NG: Nævn de 7 “common mistakes” man laver i en forhandling.
Sv:
- You made the first offer when you were not in a strong position to do so.
- You made the first offer that was not sufficiently aggressive
- You talked but did not listen
- You tried to influence the other party but did not try to learn from her.
- You did not challenge your assumptions about the other party
- Yoy miscalculated the ZOPA and did not re-evaluate it during the negotiation
- You made greater concessions than the other party did.
Hvad er “the Anchor”, hvad gør det, hvordan fastsættes det?
Sv;
Et anker, er et aggresivt første-bud i en forhandling, hvori meningen er at sætte et udgangspunkt for forhandlingen. Ankeret bevirker at modpart i mange tilfælde mindsker deres planlagte bud, idet tvivlen omkring pris gør dem usikre, idet modpart tydeligvis har vuredet objektet anderledes.
NG: Hvilke fem strategier kan benyttes, for at besvare modparts anker?
Sv:
A. Ignore the anchor
B. Seperate information from influence
C. Avoid Dwelling on their Anchor
D. Make an anchored counteroffer, then propose moderation
E. Give them time to moderate their offer without losing face.
NG: Hvilke overvejelser bør du gennemgå forud for dit første-bud?
SV:
A. Keep the ZOPA in play - give et bud udenfor din ZOPA
B. Provide justification for your offer (retfærdigør buddet)
C. Set high, bur realistic aspirations (desto højere du sætter overliggeren, desto bedre bliver outcome, har en undersøgelse vist)
D. Consider the context of the relationship (hvilket forhold ønskes med modparten, ved gentagne forhandlinger kan det være en fordel ikke at være for aggresiv, idet modparten her kan føle sig forurettet.
Hvilke effektive syv handelsstrategier findes der ?
Sv:
- Focus on the other party´s BATNA and reservation value
- Avoid making unilateral concessions
- Be comfortable with silence
- Label your concessions
- Define what it means to reciprocate
- Make contingent concessions
- Be aware of the effect of diminishing rates of concessions.
Hvordan besvarer du fornuftigt et “rigtig godt tilbud” ? nævn de 4 tilgange.
Sv:
A. Diskuter tilbuddet, uden at vise entusiasme, og pånå enighed med modpart om hvorfor det er et “fornuftigt” tilbud. (velvidende at det ikke er)
B. Forhandel et marginalt bedre tilbud hjem, idet det vil øge modparts tilfredshed med handlen.
C. Foreslå at modpart får en bedre pris, dette vil virke forebyggende for et godt samarbejde.
D. Revurder din ZOPA, modpart kan have information du ikke har, udspørg modpart. Er tilbuddet for godt til at være sandt, så Tænk, istedet for at fejre handlen.
Getting to YES har en metode, hvad går den ud på?
Sv:
- Seperate the people from the Problem
- Focus on interests, Not positions
- Invent Options for Mutual Gain
- Insist on using objective criteria
GTY: Beskriv hvilke oberbejelser der ligger bag- “Seperate the people from the problem”
Sv:
- Negotiators are people first
- Every negotiator is interested in both the substance and in the relationship.
- Perception (sætte sig i den andens sted)
- Dont deduce their interests from your fears
- Discuss each others perceptions
- Give them a stake in the outcome by making sure they participate in the process. - Emotions, recognise and understand emotions.
- Pay attention, allow the other side to let the steam off s 33 - Communication
- Listen actively, and acknowledge what is being said s 36
- Speak to be understood s 38