Sale of Unascertained Goods Flashcards

1
Q

Which provision in the SOGA provides for the sale of unascertained goods?

A

Section 23.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 18 of SOGA states that…

A

property cannot be passed unless the goods have been ascertained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case discusses the ascertainment of goods before they are to be delivered?

A

Laurie and Morewood v Dudin & Sons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The definition of ‘appropriation’ is defined in the case of Wait v Baker as…

A

an act intended and agreed upon in the terms of the contract in order to transfer ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under Section 23 of SOGA, the phrase “unconditionally appropriated to the contract” means…

A

some act must be done to clearly identify particular goods as being the subject matter of the contract and act of one party that irrevocably earmarks the goods to the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the case of Healey v Howlett and Sons about?

A

The boxes of goods were not labelled with the buyer’s name to distinguish them from the remaining boxes. The court held that the goods were not appropriated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give a summary and the decision of the case of Pignataro v Gilroy & Sons.

A

The buyer had informed that the goods were available to be collected at a specific location. However, the buyer only collected the goods 3 weeks after the delivery and the goods had been stolen. The seller was not held liable because the delivery had appropriated the goods with the buyer’s consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Goods which are in possession of a third party are unconditionally appropriated only when…

A

the third party acknowledges that they are holding the goods on behalf of the buyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case illustrates the possession of goods by a third party being unconditionally appropriated?

A

Wardar’s (Import and Export) v Norwood & Sons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

For unascertained and future goods, the deliverable state of the goods depends on…

A

what was agreed upon by the parties in the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In the case of Philip Head & Sons v Show Fronts, the carpets were not appropriated because…

A

the plaintiff contracted to sell and lay the carpets to the buyer. However, when the carpets were delivered, they were stolen before the plaintiff could lay them. The condition for the property to transfer to the buyer was for the plaintiff to lay the carpets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The sale of goods sent on approval or sale or return basis is governed under…

A

Section 24 of SOGA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Property is only transferred to the buyer under Section 24 of SOGA when…

A

24(a) : buyer signifies their approval or acceptance or adopts an act signifying acceptance.
24(b) : buyer retains goods without notice of rejection after a reasonable amount of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In the case of Kirkham v Attenborough,

A

the plaintiff delivered jewellery on sale or return to one Winter. Winter pledged the diamonds as a security to a debt. It was held that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover the goods because Winter’s act of pledging the diamonds adopts the transaction and the property had then passed to Winter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The term ‘reasonable time’ is defined under…

A

Section 63 of SOGA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In the case of Jacobs v Harbach, it was stated that…

A

time begins to run the moment the buyer receives the goods.

17
Q

What is Poole v Smith’s Car Sales (Balham) Ltd about?

A

2 cars were supplied on sale or return to a car dealer. 1 car was sold while the other car was returned after 3 months in bad condition. The court held that the reasonable time to reject the goods had expired and the car dealer must pay the full price of the car.

18
Q

Section 25 of SOGA is about…

A

reservation of title by the seller in a contract of sale, where the title transfers to the buyer only after certain conditions are fulfilled.

19
Q

The risk will be passed to the buyer upon the delivery of the goods, however…

A

the title will only pass after full payment is made by the buyer.

20
Q

The purpose of reservation of title is…

A

to prevent goods from falling into hands of buyers who will sell the goods to pay other secured creditors.

21
Q

Where did the Romalpa clause originate from?

A

The case of Aluminium Industrie Vaasen BV v Romalpa Aluminium.