SALE OF GOODS REVISION OVERVIEW. Flashcards
Define the contract of sale of goods
s2(1) of Sales of Goods Act:
Contract by which seller transfers/agrees to transfer property in goods to the buyer for a money consideration (price).
Define the term ‘contract’
Identical to contract of common law: offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal r/s.
Define the term ‘property’
Ownership
Define the term ‘goods’
s61(1) of Sales of Goods Act:
All personal chattels other than things in action and money.
Explain the term ‘personal chattel’
- Something physical
- Land and houses don’t come under that they come under ‘real property’
- exception to this land and houses rule is industrial growing crops or things attached to/ forming part of land that were agreed to be severed before sale or under contract of sale.
Explain the term ‘a thing in action’ + include an example
Refers to an intangible right enforceable by legal action
-so it has no intrinsic value but its value instead derives from the right to sue in respect of it.
example- cheques, shares in companies, patents, copyrights.
Briefly explain case of The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark v IBM UK Ltd [2011]
- Case regarding w/n sale of software is a contract of sale of goods
- contract stated title, copyright + all other proprietary rights in software = vested in manufacturer
- purchaser only obtained license to use
- held: no transfer of property in goods for purpose of SGA
But is computer software ‘goods’ for the purpose of SGA?
Akenhead J stated that in principle software could be ‘goods’ for the following reasons:
- no restriction in SGA on goods being excluded from act b/c they are of low value. Example- CD. It is low value yet still a physical object so should be considered as goods.
- recordings on CDs to add functions just gives it more attributes. Music CD is ‘goods’ so no difference in case of software.
- definition of ‘goods’ = inclusive not exclusive. SGA not excluding anything which might properly be considered goods.
Explain what cases are used to analyse whether computer software would be considered ‘goods’.
St Albans City and District Council- necessary to distinguish b/w program and disk carrying it.
Southwark v IBM- important to examine contractual terms which come following to which customer acquires system.
So- if like in St Albans City case the purchase was of a license to use it may not be considered transfer of property UNLESS like said in Southwark v IBM, that a term in the contract was said to involve an agreement highlighting transfer of property to the buyer, it would be sufficient to be classified as ‘goods’ for purpose of SGA.
Briefly explain the requirement of money consideration in SGA
For it to be a contract of sale of goods MONEY exchange is required. It is not enough to just trade things of economic value.
-if money is exchanged due to ones goods being worth more than the other THEN 2 contracts of sale are formed.
What are the cases for Money Considerations? Briefly explain them both
1) Aldridge v Johnson (1875) - farmer exchanged bullock for barely. Barely worth more, so difference paid in cash. Held: 2 contracts of sale existed as parties gave price to both lots of goods and consideration was MONEY.
2) Esso Petroleum Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [1976] - Garages supplied FREE GIFT to motorists for ever 4 petrol gallons purchased. Held- not contract of sale of goods as consideration in return for gift wasn’t money it was a contract for the petrol.
When answering a question on sale of goods, it is essential to have in mind that the SGA only applies to contracts of sale of goods defined by s2(1) of SGA. Contract will not be of sale of goods unless:
- transfer or agreement to transfer property exists (this EXCLUDES other contracts like hire purchase, hire, etc that aren’t governed by SGA.
- Consideration has to be money.
What’s the difference b/w the terms: ‘sales’ and ‘agreements to sell’ ?
Sale- with a sale, property in goods = transferred from seller to buyer as soon as contract formed s2(4) SGA.
Agreement to sell- transfer of property in goods takes place at a future time/ subject to a condition later to be fulfilled s2(6) SGA.
At the time of making a contract, goods will be either specific or Unascertained. Explain the difference of the two terms.
Specific goods- goods identified + agreed upon at time contract of sale is made s61(1) SGA. So both buyer and seller have agreed upon exactly which goods will be sold under contract.
Unascertained goods- not identified in SGA, are instead all goods that are not specific.
What 2 types of classifications are there of goods that form subject of a contract of sale?
1) Existing goods
2) Future goods