Sale Of Goods Flashcards
What is the main legal issue in Clegg v Olle Anderson?
The main issue is whether the defendant’s use of force was reasonable in the context of self-defense.
In Clegg v Olle Anderson, what was the court’s ruling regarding the defendant’s actions?
The court ruled that the defendant’s actions were not reasonable and thus not justified under self-defense.
True or False: In Healy v Howlett, the court focused on the issue of negligence.
True
What was the outcome of Healy v Howlett?
The court found in favor of the claimant, establishing that the defendant was negligent.
Fill in the blank: In Hartley v Hymans, the claimant was seeking damages for __________.
personal injury
What principle was established in Hartley v Hymans regarding liability?
The principle established was that liability could arise even in the absence of direct negligence if the actions were inherently dangerous.
Multiple Choice: Which case involves the concept of self-defense? A) Clegg v Olle Anderson B) Healy v Howlett C) Hartley v Hymans
A) Clegg v Olle Anderson
What type of law does Clegg v Olle Anderson primarily deal with?
Criminal law
True or False: Healy v Howlett involved a dispute over a contract.
False
What was a key factor in determining negligence in Healy v Howlett?
The standard of care expected from the defendant.
In Hartley v Hymans, who was found liable?
The defendant, Hymans, was found liable for the injuries caused.
Fill in the blank: The court in Clegg v Olle Anderson emphasized the importance of __________ in self-defense cases.
proportionality
What legal standard is often applied in negligence cases like Healy v Howlett?
The reasonable person standard.
Multiple Choice: Which case is associated with the defense of necessity? A) Clegg v Olle Anderson B) Healy v Howlett C) Hartley v Hymans
C) Hartley v Hymans
What does the term ‘duty of care’ refer to in the context of Healy v Howlett?
The obligation of the defendant to ensure the safety of others.
True or False: The outcome of Hartley v Hymans set a precedent for future personal injury claims.
True
What is the significance of the term ‘causation’ in negligence cases?
It establishes a link between the defendant’s actions and the claimant’s injury.
In Clegg v Olle Anderson, what was the defendant’s argument regarding the use of force?
The defendant argued that the force used was necessary for self-defense.
Fill in the blank: The ruling in Healy v Howlett reinforced the concept of __________ in tort law.
negligence
What did the court analyze regarding the foreseeability of harm in Hartley v Hymans?
Whether the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions.
Multiple Choice: Which case did NOT involve a claim for damages? A) Clegg v Olle Anderson B) Healy v Howlett C) Hartley v Hymans
A) Clegg v Olle Anderson
What role does ‘reasonable foreseeability’ play in cases like Healy v Howlett?
It determines whether the defendant could have anticipated the risk of harm.
True or False: Clegg v Olle Anderson was primarily concerned with tort law.
False
What is one key takeaway from Hartley v Hymans regarding liability?
Liability can be established without direct negligence if the actions are inherently risky.
