SAC 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Civil Justice System

A

The civil justice system is a set of methods, processes and institutions used to resolve civil disputes.

Purposes:

  • enables a person to enforce their legal rights and take action against legal wrongs.
  • determines whether the defendant is liable to that person.
  • award a remedy where the defendant has been found liable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Burden of Proof

A

The responsibility of the party bringing the case to prove the claims made. In civil law this is in the Plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Standard of Proof

A

The degree or level at which the party carrying the burden of proof must prove liability. In civil case it is on the balance of probabilities which means it must be proved that the defendant more probably than not infringed the defendants rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fairness

A
  • Fair process and a fair hearing/trial by an impartial 3rd party.
  • Mediation and conciliation increase fairness and access.
  • Availability and access to legal representation increases fairness.
  • The timely resolution of a dispute increases fairness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Equality

A
  • Both parties should be treated impartially and held to the same standard.
  • Disadvantage of particular groups in the justice systems hinders Equality, for example indigenous people or people with disabilities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Access

A
  • A range of institutions and methods are needed to settle disputes, for example CAV and VCAT.
  • Interpreters
  • Specialist courts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Representative Proceedings

A

A legal proceeding in which a group of people who have a claim based on similar or related facts bring forth legal action.

  • at least 7 plaintiffs.
  • only in supreme or federal courts.
  • cannot settle out of court without the courts permission.

Strengths:

  • increases access as individuals can come together financially to bring action.
  • increases efficiency.

Weaknesses:

  • Costs are significant, with the costs awarded through damages often going toward the legal fees prior to the group receiving any funds.
  • individuals in the group may not be adequately compensated.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negotiation

A

an informal discussion between two or more parties in dispute, aiming to come to an agreement on how to resolve the dispute.

  • not compulsory.
  • outside court environment.
  • least formal of any dispute resolution.
  • parties have total control.

Strengths:

  • gives both parties an opportunity to avoid the legal system or other A.D.M’s altogether.
  • parties have total control over the outcome.

Weaknesses:

  • not legally binding.
  • possible power imbalance
  • not as thorough as a court hearing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Costs

A

Costs in the civil system include for legal representation, disbursements, adverse cost orders (if plaintiff loses they may be ordered to pay defendants legal fees), private mediation, expert witnesses and court fees.

Strengths:

  • parties have some control over the costs they incur and are able to make choices on these, for example the extent of their legal rep and whether to request a jury.
  • 3 tiered cost system ensures that poorer people don’t have to pay the same amount in civil fees in comparison to richer people and businesses.

Weaknesses:

  • limitation of VLA in civil disputes with only 8% of cases VLA take are civil cases, making it difficult for individuals to navigate the high costs.
  • numerous fees go towards legal advice, representation, court filing and hearing fees, limiting access
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Limitations of Actions

A

Refers to the time period in which a civil action must commence.

  • Defamation: 1 year
  • Negligence: 3 years
  • Torts: 6 Years

Strengths:

  • timeframe ensures cases are brought to the courts based on recent evidence, making the hearing more reliable and fair.
  • increases efficiency as cases must be Brought forward within a certain time limit.

Weaknesses:
- may prevent plaintiffs from pursuing their rights, denying them access.
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Scope of Liability

A

The extent to which the defendant is liable. The plaintiff must show that it is reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances to hold the defendant legally responsible for that harm and it most be in the ‘scope of liability’.

2 categories of defendants:
Direct Defendant:

100% liable, potentially no shared responsibility.

Indirect Defendant:

  • Vicarious liability: employers may be responsible for the action of their employees, so, for example an employee mate sue another employee and their employer.
  • insurers often have to make payment on behalf of their customers, making them defendants also. For example if the defendant loses, they may seek money from their insurance company.

Contributory Negligence:

When the defendant commits a civil wrong, but also the plaintiff does something negligent that places their harm outside the reasonable scope of the defendants liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Enforcement Issues

A

Also known as enforcement orders. Whether or not the result will be able to be enforced may influence a plaintiff’s decision to bring forward a civil claim. If the plaintiff does not get financially compensated, they may sue something else and widen the scope of liability.

The court will do everything in their power to ensure compensation is paid. This may include seizing property, attachment of earnings orders and an instalment order.

Strengths:

  • increases access and fairness to the plaintiff as it ensures they are compensated.
  • promotes fairness for the defendant also as it utilises a wide range of options for the defendant to compensate the plaintiff if they struggle to meet their obligations.

Weaknesses:

  • may upset parties who expected their case to be concluded already, preventing access.
  • the defendant still maybe unable to meet the demands, resulting in the plaintiff not receiving adequate compensation, limiting fairness.
  • different parties will not be treated equally under this approach as some defendants get more special consideration.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CAV

A

A vic government body responsible for regulating Victorian consumer affairs. It advises the Vic government on consumer legislation, provides information and guidance to educate people on consumer laws, and enforces compliance with consumer laws.

Specialises in landlord/tenant disputes, consumer/business disputes.

Purpose/Role:

  • provides consumers/tenants with an avenue to launch a complaint against traders/landlords
  • provides information to the community and government re the sale of goods and services.
  • review and advise the state government on consumer legislation and industry codes,.

Resolution methods used:
- Mainly conciliation.
involves the assistance of an independent third party who uses specialist knowledge to offer suggestions. The decision is binding if a terms of settlement is signed which reflect their agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Appropriateness, Strengths and Weaknesses of CAV

A
Appropriateness:
Is it within CAV's jurisdiction?
- the supply of goods and services.
- residential tenancies.
- retirement villages.
- owners corporations.

is the dispute likely to settle?

  • no delay in person. complaining to CAV.
  • no history that a party has refused to participate.
  • the problem is about a business or landlord etc etc.

Strengths:
Legal representation is usually not a feature, reducing costs, increasing access and fairness.

Process is informal, removing many anxieties, increasing access.

Conciliation service is free, reducing costs.

Weaknesses:
CAV can be selective on what cases they take on, limiting access.

Role is limited to consumer and landlord disputes, meaning they have no power to assist anyone with other civil disputes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

VCAT

A

A tribunal created to provide a forum for the. resolution of relatively simple civil disputes, that I generally less expensive, less formal and quicker than the courts. They deal with spites involving the purchase and supply of goods (ie. Faulty goods), involving discrimination and sexual harassment and regarding rental agreements.

Has 4 Lists:
Administrative: Includes planning and environmental list.
Civil: includes domestic building and consumer matters
Human Rights: includes equal opportunity, racial discrimination.
Residential tenancies: includes issues with residential tenant and landlords.

Purpose:
provides victorians with low cost, accessible, efficient and independent dispute resolution.

Resolution Methods Used:
Mediation (around 70% of the time).

Other than mediation they use compulsory conferences, arbitration or a formal hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Appropriateness, Strengths and Weaknesses of VCAT

A

the types of claims that can be heard by VCAT include claims about:

  • purchases or sales of goods(unlike CAV, this includes claims made by sellers and businesses as well as purchasers).
  • disputes between tenants and landlords relating to renting a house, unit or flat etc.
  • owners corporations
  • domestic building works
  • lawyers, lawyers conduct and the provision of legal services.
  • the flow of water between properties.
  • retail tenancies.
  • the use or development of land, including objections to permits.

Strengths:

  • generally offers a speedy resolution of disputes.
  • no need for legal representation, with it often being discouraged. increases fairness and equality as unrepresented parties aren’t disadvantaged.
  • tends to be an informal process and can use telephone or video conferencing, increasing access.
Weaknesses:
-Is limited in disputes they hear, only civil disputes and no criminal cases or class actions.
  • VCAT can suffer long delays in lists, in particular the planning and environment list. which had a median wait time of 6 months.
  • limited avenue of appeal, can only appeal on point of law from President or Vice President.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

CAV vs VCAT

A

Similarities:
Both CAV and VCAT generally provide a cheaper, quicker, less formal, more specialised alternative to the courts.
- there is no need for legal rep.
- tends to be an informal process, with telephone and video conferencing available.

Differences:

  • Jurisdiction
  • Costs

Appropriateness of CAV vs VCAT:

Is it within their jurisdiction?
CAV - landlord/tenant or business/consumer disputes.
VCAT- 4 divisions and exclusive jurisdiction- retail tenancies and building disputes

Do the parties get along?
CAV - only use conciliation and often have no legal rep, therefore parties must be able to resolve the dispute themselves.
VCAT- uses mediation, compulsory case conference, final hearing.
therefore, if the parties don’t cooperate they can move to a hearing. However, most VCAT cases are solved though mediation with no legal rep.

18
Q

Pre-Trial Procedures

A

Purposes:
- may lead to early resolution, movement to alternative dispute resolution or otherwise greater prepares the parties for trial.

Pleadings:
First stage:
Writ- plaintiff informs defendant that they are being sued.
Statement of claim- sets out what the plaintiff claims, what evidence they will be relying on and the remedy they are seeking.
Statement of Defence- defendants response to the statement claim, outlining what they admit and deny.

Pleadings ensure the parties know the claim/defence of the other, avoiding any confusion in court. Also, may promote the chances of an out of court settlement as parties can assess the strength of the others case.

Discovery:
Both parties engage in full and honest disclosure of all evident that have that support their claims ie. letters, contracts, emails etc.

This ensures both parties know the documents that will be used. Also, promotes fairness as parties have access to all relevant material, and may also promote an out of court settlement between the two.

Exchange of Evidence:
Lay Evidence:
Evidence given by ordinary people. Eg. I saw the plaintiff fall over.

Expert Evidence:
People with areas of expertise who provide opinions on the issues of the case. Expert witnesses are obliged to act independently.

This ensures parties can prepare for trial, they can assess the strength of the others case, gives the parties a chance to obtain experts who can rebut the opposing argument and may enhance the ability of the parties reaching an out of court settlement.

19
Q

Reasons for Court Hierarchy

A

Same as Criminal Justice System.

  • Appeals
  • Administrative Convenience
  • Specialisation:
    MC up to $100,000

CC Unlimited civil jurisdiction, usually claims upward of $100,000

SCTD unlimited civil jurisdiction, but usually hears the most serious/complex matters.

20
Q

Judge

A

What they do?

  • apply rules of evidence and procedure.
  • instruct the jury if there is one
  • resolve points of law.
  • decide remedy in cases where there is no jury.

What they don’t do?

  • assist parties
  • decide on questions of fact if there is a jury.

Summary:
Acts as an impartial umpire, ensuring a fair trial and parties are treated equally.Also has significant powers of case management to ensure the just, timely and cost effective resolution of issues in disputes.

21
Q

Jury

A

What they do?

  • decide on questions of fact.
  • apply the facts as they see them, as instructed by the judge.
  • deliver a verdict.

What they don’t do?

  • resolve points of law.
  • decide on a remedy in defamation cases.

Summary:
a randomly picked group of 6-8 members who have no connection with the parties. They only decide on facts that are put before them, they represent the views and values of society.

22
Q

Parties

A

What they do?
Plaintiff: attempt to prove the liability of the defendant.

Defendant: attempt to discredit the plaintiff and provide evidence proving they weren’t liable for the civil wrong.

Summary:
Parties may choose whether to use mediation unless the judge orders it, how their case will be presented and which witness will be used, whether to settle before trial and whether to use a lawyer.

23
Q

Legal Practitioners

A

What they do?
-Present their parties case in the best possible light.

comply with overarching obligations of the courts:

  • act honestly
  • only take steps to resolve or determine the dispute.
  • cooperate.
  • narrow issues in dispute.
  • minimise delay.
24
Q

Judicial Powers of Case Management

A

Each case must be assessed and conducted based on the needs and complexity of the case. Though allowing judges to actively manage the trial, judicial case management is effective as it allows for the identification of issues at the earliest stage of trial and allows for judges to responsibly control these issues.

Power to order mediation:
- The judge can order mediation at any time.

Power to give directions:

  • determining the admissibility of evidence.
  • the judge may limit the number of witnesses which allows the courts to minimise delays.

Strengths:

  • assists in promoting out of court settlement.
  • supports a timely resolution of disputes.

Weaknesses:

  • increases the chance of bias being present.
  • some directions may be unnecessary and simply time consuming
25
Q

Mediation

A

A method of dispute resolution, where an independent third party (mediator) facilitates discussion between the parties to help them reach a resolution, but they don’t offer any suggestions.

  • It’s a cooperative process as parties must work together in order to come to a resolution.
  • Is binding provided they sign terms of settlement.
  • non confrontational setting and is private and confidential.

Appropriate if:

  • parties cooperate
  • parties seek to retain their relationship.
  • parties want to retain a level of confidentiality
  • the resolution should be easily reached

Not appropriate if:

  • poor communication.
  • power imbalance
  • a lot of evidence needs to be sifted through.

Strengths:

  • parties have control over the outcome.
  • more cost effective and timely.
  • limited rules of evidence and procedure increases access as its a more informal process.

weaknesses:

  • lack of scrutiny of evidence which can lead to an unfair outcome.
  • use of a private mediator can be expensive.
  • decision is not binding unless parties sign the terms of settlement.
26
Q

Conciliation

A

a method of dispute resolution which involves an independent third party (conciliator) to help the disputing parties reach a solution, with the conciliator being able to make suggestions and offer advice to assist in finding an acceptable resolution.

Similar to mediation EXCEPT:

  • conciliator can offer suggestions
  • no used as extensively in courts and VCAT, but used in CAV

Most appropriate for more complex commercial diluted where the conciliators expertise is sought.

Strengths:

  • parties can utilise the expert knowledge of the conciliator to aid in resolving their dispute.
  • more accessible than court hearings as there is no evidence and procedure, and parties don’t need legal rep.

Weaknesses:

  • not used extensively in courts.
  • decision is not binding unless terms of settlement is signed by the parties.
  • less scrutiny of evidence which may result in an unfair outcome
27
Q

Arbitration

A

A method of dispute resolution in which an independent person (arbitrator) is appointed to listen to both sides of the dispute and make a decision which is legally binding on the parties. The decision is known as an arbitral award.

Appropriate if:

  • suing in magistrates court for under $10,000.
  • insufficient level of cooperation for mediation and conciliation.
  • parties cannot afford costs of court/trial.

Not appropriate if:

  • parties seek extensive scrutiny of evidence.
  • parties are cooperative, in which mediation and conciliation would be appropriate.
  • parties want jury.

Strengths:

  • the arbitrator brings a formality to the decision, with it being legally binding and enforceable.
  • can appeal the decision on point of law with leave, increasing access.
  • prompt resolution.
  • confidential.

Weaknesses:

  • limited right to appeal.
  • informality and lack of scrutiny of evidence may lead to an unfair outcome.
  • no precedent to follow thereby lacking consistency.
28
Q

Remedies

A

At the conclusion of a civil hearing/trial a successful plaintiff may be awarded a remedy to restore the plaintiff to their original position before the loss occurred.

Two types of remedies:
Damages - a court order that the defendant has to pay the plaintiff.
Injunctions- a court order either compelling or preventing the defendant from doing something

Purposes:

  1. to return the plaintiff to the position they were before their rights were infringed.
  2. to compensate the plaintiff for the infringement of their rights, if returning them to their original position isn’t possible.
  3. preventing the harm from occurring in the first place or preventing further harm from occurring.
29
Q

Damages

A

damages are a monetary payment awarded to the plaintiff, to be paid by the defendant by way of a court order and to compensate the plaintiff for the losses suffered.

Types of damages:

COMPENSATORY:
most common damages
Specific:
actual and precise monetary value, eg. medical expenses or loss of wages.
General:
not easily quantifiable.
courts assessment of magnitude and long term consequences of the wrong. eg. job prospects, pain
Aggravated:
additional compensation where plaintiff is humiliated due to defendants conduct.

NOMINAL:
acknowledgement of plaintiff being in the right but little damage/loss has actually occurred, resulting in only a small amount being awarded.

CONTEMPTUOUS:
small amount of money awarded in the plaintiff has legal right but not moral right to damages. legally not restored to original position but can be beneficial. eg. old lady never missed rent, lost job and can’t pay repayments.

EXEMPLARY/PUNITIVE:
aim to punish and deter the defendant.
doesn’t go to defendant and instead goes to charity. EG. in addition to defendant giving plaintiff money, they must give extra money to charity.
it is the only time in civilian when punishment is sought.

30
Q

Damages Achievement of Purposes of Civil Law

A

Achievement:

  • often able to return the plaintiff to their prior position before the civil wring because often the harm is financial in nature,
  • damages are able to compensate for harm even if it is not financial as the courts estimate the monetary value of different kinds of harm, eg. pain and suffering.

Problems:

  • enforcement issues as the pursuit of damages is dependant on the ability of the defendant to pay. If the defendant cannot pay, access to justice is hindered.
  • when one of the patties requests a jury, the jury decides the sum of the damages which is very inconsistent from jury to jury.
  • damages are often difficult to calculate as there are many factors to consider such as suffering and humiliation.
31
Q

Injunctions

A

a court order directing someone to resist from an actionor compelling them to do something.

Restrictive: ordering a person to refrain from performing a certain action eg. an ex-spouse visiting a child at school.

Mandatory: ordering a person to perform a certain act eg. must perform their part of the coatrack that they entered into or make a written apology for defamatory comments.

Mandatory or restrictive injunctions can be either:

Interlocutory: awarded before trial when matter is urgent and cannot wait until trial. Only temporary until a final court decision has been made through a proper hearing.

Perpetual: a permanent injunction granted after the case has been heard if plaintiff is successful. Remains in force indefinitely or until revoked or altered by the court later.

Purposes:
- to prevent or limit the event of loss to a plaintiff by rectifying a situation caused by the person who was found to be in the wrong through forcing or restricting someone from doing so.

32
Q

Injunctions Achievement of Purposes of Civil Law:

A

Achievement of Purposes:

  • courts are able to order a defendant to perform concrete actions, clarity is provided on what is needed to restore the plaintiff to their original position.
  • they prevent further harm or loss from occurring.
  • provides a more diverse remedy than simply financial compensation.

Problems:

  • often needs to be attached to damages to properly compensate a plaintiff, if given alone it wouldn’t fully compensate a plaintiff.
  • may be enforcement issues as the defendant has to do it and may fail to honour their side of the order, preventing access for the plaintiff.
33
Q

Factors Affecting the Achievement of the Principles of Justice:

TIME

A

Strengths:

  • Short mediation and hearing for claims under $3000, hearing is on the same day if mediation fails.
  • if parties into an out of court settlement it saves them the time of a court hearing.
  • no pre-trial procedures for alternative dispute resolution.

Weaknesses:

  • if mediations or conciliation doesn’t work, parties must go to a trial.
  • planning and environment VCAT list has median wait time of 6 months.
  • pre trial procedures can be lengthy.
34
Q

Factors Affecting the Achievement of the Principles of Justice:

COSTS

A

Strengths:

  • If mediation, conciliation or arbitration are successful it avoids the cost of a full trial.
  • Representative proceedings save costs as expenses are shared across the plaintiffs.
  • CAV is free.
  • VCAT often low costs.

Weaknesses:

  • in 2014, the productivity commission estimated that a SC trial costs a plaintiff about $60,000.
  • limited legal aid funding for civil claims.
  • private mediation costs can be extensive.
  • if mediation or conciliation fails, it will go to trial anyway.
35
Q

Factors Affecting the Achievement of the Principles of Justice:

ACCESIBILITY

A

Strengths:
- easy to access dispute resolution due to the large number of courts and tribunals across the state.
51 MC’s
37 VCAT’s
- Representative proceedings allow for shared costs, increasing accessibility.

Weaknesses:

  • There are severe language and cognitive barriers.
  • often individuals don’t know about the range of dispute resolution methods available to them.
  • there are geographic barriers hindering access, particularly in rural areas.
36
Q

Recent Reforms:

EFiling in the Supreme Court

A

At the beginning of 2017 the supreme court introduced a policy for the use of electronic filing, with hard copy filing becoming increasingly unusual. Any failure to cooperate with the use of technology which created additional costs and that the court deems unreasonable may result in a costs order against the offending party.

Strengths:

  • Saves the time needed to file documents manually.
  • Reduces money from hard copy filing, eg. paper, ink
  • files can be a reached easily online, increasing access.

Weaknesses:
- online copies may be easily manipulated.

37
Q

Recent Reforms:

The Three Tier System in VCAT

A

Introduces in 2016, VCAT divides its cost into three tiers, with each party being in a specific one bases on their financial standing, ensuring VCAT remains accessible and costs are maintained.

  • lowest tier, for healthcare card holders is capped at $159 for each fee.
  • standard fee payers are defined as individuals, not for profit organisations and businesses with a turnover of less than $200,000 in the previous financial year.
  • corporation fees apply to businesses turning over more than $200,000 per year.

Strengths:
- increases access as more individuals are bale to access VCAT for dispute resolution.

  • achieves equality as fees are distributed according to financial circumstances.
  • increases fairness as ensures both parties are able to present their case in the best possible way.

Weaknesses:
- fairness may be denies to third parties presiding over for example hearings, where they may not be as qualified as judicial officers.

  • equality may be denies due to the eligibility criteria to be a healthcare card holder. Different fees for different people, not true equality.
  • access may be denied as there are still many costs involved which may prohibit certain parties from pursuing a claim.
38
Q

Recommended Reforms:

Increased use of alternative methods of dispute resolution

A

The victorian access to justice review has recommended increases use of alternative methods of dispute resolution. A particular recommendation was made that VCAT should expand its short mediation and hearing program into rural areas.

Strengths:

  • reduces delays such as Planning and Environmental list which has a median wait time of 6 months.
  • increases equality as individuals, regardless of geographic location can access dispute resolution.
  • upholds equality as it provides a greater ability for people from lower socio-economic backgrounds to utilise a cheaper method of dispute resolution.

Weaknesses:

  • these alternative dispute resolution may use lenient rules of evidence and procedure which may limit the chances of a fair resolution.
  • equality may be compromised if there is a power imbalance in the parties.
  • still costs and delays associated, limiting access.
39
Q

Recommended Reform:

More Legal Aid Funding

A

A recommended reform would be to increase funding for legal aid as it can branch out into civil cases and aid those financially disadvantaged in a civil dispute.

Strengths
- increase fairness and equality as it aids those who may be financially compromised to resolve any disputes they are involved in.

Weaknesses:

  • relies on government funding.
  • may cause time constraints in VLA and big cues.
  • government often not always supportive as some voters see it as support for their own representation.
40
Q

Recommended Reform:

Mediation Pilot Program

A

The DSCV provides a free mediation service for defended civil claims at some Magistrate’s courts . Quick and inexpensive resolution without going through a court hearing which is available only for civil claims under $40,000.

Strengths

  • encourages early dispute resolution settlement which saves time and costs of a full trial.
  • informal nature and legal representation is not necessary.
  • parties are in control of decision in a less intimidating environment.

Weaknesses:

  • mediation involves a lack of a binding decision and the parties must cooperate.
  • informally and lack of rules of evidence and procedure can result in an unfair outcome.