SA12/13 Witness Handling Flashcards
What does s139 CJA 2003 relate to?
Use of documents to refresh memory.
What is the general rule regarding the competence and compellability of witnesses?
Ss53(1) YJCEA 1999: ‘At every stage in criminal proceedings all person are (whatever their age) competent to give evidence’.
All competent witnesses are compellable.
What are the two exceptions to the general rule regarding competency?
a) A person is not competent if it appears to the court that he is not able to understand qs put to him as a witness and give intelligible answers to those questions.
b) An accused is not a competent witness for the prosecution.
How does a court decide a child’s competence?
Cannot decide on age alone. Is specific to the individual.
- They do not need to understand every single question or give an answer that can be readily understood to every single q put to them to be considered competent.
- Do not need to understand the special importance of telling the truth in court.
- Court needs to deal with matter broadly and fairly.
When should the issue of a witnesses competence be determined?
Before the witness is sworn.
Once an issue relating to a witnesses competence is raised/becomes apparent to the judge, what is left to the judge to decide?
The judge is bound to investigate and must make a judgment as to whether the statutory test for competence is met.
NOT an exercise of judicial discretion.
Who bears the burden of showing a witness is competent?
What is the standard?
The party calling the witness.
Balance of probabilities.
In determining whether a witness can understand the qs put to them and give an intelligible answer, how must the court regard the witnesses?
As having the benefit of any special measures direction that the court has given/proposes to give.
Who may the judge hear evidence from regarding the competency of the witnesses?
the parties, an expert.
How should the judge determine the competency of a child in relation to the statutory test?
The judge should watch the child’s videotaped ABE interview and, if necessary, put questions to the witness.
Qs should take place in the presence of the parties.
At what point can the prosecution call an accused person to give evidence against a co- accused?
Once they cease to be a ‘person charged in the criminal proceedings’.
Is a spouse/civil partner of the accused compellable (where competent) for the Defence?
Yes – unless they are also charged in the same proceedings s80(2) and (4) PACE.
Is a spouse/civil partner of the accused compellable (where competent) for the Prosecution?
Only in relation to a specified offence:
- an assault on, injury or threat of injury to, the spouse or civil partner
- an assault on, injury or threat of injury to, person under the age of 16
- a sexual offence committed in relation to a person under the age of 16 or
- an offence of attempting or conspiring to commit, or of aiding and abetting, counselling, or procuring or inciting the commission of any of the above offences.
Who is usually responsible for securing the attendance of prosecution witnesses?
The police.
Who is usually responsible for securing the attendance of defence witnesses?
The defence solicitors.
Crown Court – when is an application for a witness summons likely to be made?
Where:
* A witness is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce a material exhibit
* But will not attend voluntarily
* And it is in the interests of justice to issue the summons.
What is the consequence of disobeying a witness summons without just excuse?
Contempt of court.
Punishable summarily by up to 3 months in prison.
Mags Court – when is an application for a witness summons likely to be made?
Where:
* A witness is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce a material exhibit for the purposes of a summary trial AND
* it is in the interests of justice to issue the summons.