S8Ch50_The Primary Contractual Documents Flashcards
Project Delivery_Single Prime Contract
Most common type: Owner- GC agreement. Subcontractors under GC.Advantage: Owner has a single source of responsibility, which also makes the project easier for the Arch to administer.
Project Delivery_Multiple Prime Contract
Major portions (eg. MEP) are in contract w Owner. Specialty contractors favor this, but more diff for Arch.
Project Delivery_Many Prime Contract
Usually applied in Fast Track construction. Much more difficult to manage, often requires CM for coordination.
Project Delivery_Design-Award-Build
Traditional method where Owner has separate contracts w Arch and GC. Pro: all roles are well defined, straightforward method. Con: One phase must be completely finished before proceeding to the next. If Owner needs the building quickly or if extended design result in higher financing costs.
Project Delivery_Fast-Track
Overlapping some of the design and construction process to reduce total time of project delivery. This method requires many prime contracts and much more coordination, often requires a CM.
Project Delivery_Construction Manager (CM)
Third party overseeing (pros): early advice on constructability of design, early cost estimation and value analysis, project scheduling, professional mngmnt of contracts, and sometimes, a guaranteed price and completion date.Cons:Extra costs and more complicated mngmnt structure. This can be minimized if GC acts as CM. However, when this occurs, advantage of competitive bidding among GCs is lost.
Project Delivery_Fixed Price (aka Stipulated Sum or Lump Sum) Method
Contractor gives owner a set price for project. Owner is not responsible for cost overruns nor shares in any savings.
Project Delivery_Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Method
The Owner has a fixed, max price that the contractor or CM guarantees. If the project is completed for less, the client receives the cost savings.
Project Delivery_Cost-Plus-Fee Method
Owner pays the actual cost of construction (direct plus indirect costs) plus a fee that is agreed to before construction begins.
Project Delivery_Design-Build Method
Owner contracts with one entity to provide both design and construction services. Typically used by Owners who have building experience w multiple facilities and who have clearly defined needs that can be precisely stated in performance requirements.
Project Delivery_Design-Build Pros and Cons
Pros: A single source of responsibility. The owner has a fixed price early in the process. Total time of design and construction is usually reduced over more traditional approaches. Cons: Owner does not have much control over design as w other methods, once the contract is signed/There can be disagreements concerning what was supposed to be included in the design/The design-build firm has control over the quality of the materials and construction methods/In order to get what is needed, the client must develop a specific set of performance requirements.
Project Delivery_Bridging
A variation of the design-build approach combining the advantages of the traditional design-bid-build. The owner hires an Arch/Eng (AE) to be PM. This AE/PM acts as an advisor and works w owner to develop the project. The AE/PM also works w public and private groups to pain necessary approvals and develops scope drawings and specs. The owner then makes documents available for bidding by design-build firms. The selected DB firm takes over the responsibilities of the AE and the firm produces the final, detailed CD. The AE/PM reviews but is not responsible for the final documents. The DB firm uses the final docs to secure the necessary permits, review submittals and construction.
Project Delivery_Advantages of Bridging
This approach is best to construct the project at the lowest cost while meeting requirements of the owner. For the Owner, bridging combines an important advantage of design-build, having someone to represent the owner’s interests throughout the process, w the advantages of competitive bidding, a fixed cost, and single source responsibility for construction.
Project Delivery_Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
A method of completing a project in which all participants collaborate closely from the project’s earliest conceptualization to move-in.IPD depends heavily on tech, communication, and having an integrated BIM that everyone has access to.
Project Delivery_Phases of IPD
Conceptualization (pre-design), Criteria design(SD), Detail design (DD), Implementation Documents (CD), Agency Review, Buyout (bidding from participants not incl. in the integrated team), Construction (CA), and Closeout. The early design phases may take slightly longer, but the implementation docs and agency review/buyout phases will take less time, and total project delivery time will be shorter overall. Pros: Better design, shorter project delivery time, lower cost, quality construction, and fewer problems during construction. Although there are many details that are unique to this delivery method, such as compensation, legal responsibilities, and tech standards, IPD has a potential to improve how projects are designed and built.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Article 1: Initial Information
The architect and owner to itemize the information and assumptions about the project, if known at the time of contract execution. Such as: the project’s objective; site information; the owner’s program; the physical, legal, financial, and time parameters; and the key personnel for both the owner and the architect. The information may materially change and if it does the owner and architect shall adjust the schedule, the architect’s services, and the architect’s compensation.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Article 2: The Architect’s Responsibilities
A standard of care paragraph requires the architect to perform services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality, same or similar circumstances, etc.
The architect must not engage in any activity or accept any employment or interest that would compromise the architect’s judgment. Art 2 further requires the architect and owner to list the types and amounts of insurance the architect is requires to carry for the project. including: general liability, automobile liability, workers’ comp, and professional liability. If any insurance are in excess, the owner is required to reimburse the architect for addtnl cost.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Article 3: Scope of Architect’s basic services
These include usual and customary structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services.
-Project administration services: The architect must coordinate the arch’s services w those provided by the owner and owner’s consultants/The arch must submit, for the owner’s approval, a schedule for the performance of the arch’s services/The arch is also expected to consider environmentally responsible design alternatives during the schematic design phase.
-Evaluation of budget and cost of work
-Evaluation and planning services: the arch should notify the owner of any impact that the budget, schedule, site or method of contracting may have on the project.
-Design Services: Incl. the bulk of arch’s standard services, incl. SD, DD, and CD. At the end of each phase,the owner’s approval is a precondition that must be received before the arch can begin work on the next phase.
-Construction procurement services: The arch ASSISTS in obtaining competitive bids or negotiated proposals and must assist in awarding the contract and preparing contracts for construction. The arch only acts as an agent for the owner and is not a party to the Owner Contractor Agreement.
-Contract Administration services: The arch must make site visits at intervals to determine whether the project will be in accordance w the CDs. Must keep owner informed of the progress and defects. Not required to make exhaustive or continuous onsite inspections.
The arch is not (contractor is) responsible for the means of construction, building techniques or safety precautions unless the arch has actually specified means and methods of construction.
Owner and contractor are supposed to communicate through the arch. Same goes for consultants.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_The Owner’s Responsibilities
Owner must provide the architect with: program, schedule and budget/ services of consultants/tests, inspections, and reports required by law or cds suchs as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, along w pollution or hazardous materials/ all legal, insurance, and accounting services/program that gives the owner’s objectives, schedule, constraints, and design criteria, incl. space requirements, special equip, systems and site requirements/land surveys/location of utilities, right-of-way, etc/geotechnical engineer for test borings, determination of soil bearing values, percolation tests, evaluation of hazardous materials, etc.
The arch may assist the owner in procuring these services and coordination the necessary information.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Terms and Conditions of the Contract_Instruments of Service:
The drawings, specs, and other docs, incl electronic files, are considered instruments of service whose authors and owners are the architect and its consultants. If the arch rightfully terminates the agreement for cause as provided for elsewhere in the agreement, this license is terminated. If the Arch does not terminate, the owner retains the license to use the instruments of service after completion of the project or the owner’s termination of the agreement. If the owner later uses the instruments of service without the arch, the owner agrees to release and indemnify the arch and its consultants for all claims and causes of action arising from such uses.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Terms and Conditions of the Contract_Waiver of consequential damages
Both the Arch and owner waive consequential damages, which limits claims to damages resulting directly from a breach of the agreement.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Terms and Conditions of the Contract_Hazardous material
The Arch and arch’s consultants have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal, or disposal of or for the exposure of persons to hazardous materials such as asbestos, PCBs, or other toxic substances.
O-A Agreements AIA Doc B101_Terms and Conditions of the Contract_Third-Party claims
One provision states that nothing in the agreement shall create a contractual relationship with a third party against either the arch or the owner. This is to reinforce the idea of privity, which states that one party to a contract is protected from claims from other parties with whom there is no direct contractual relationship.