S2 Exam Flashcards
DRO
Rf given when an undesirable behaviour is NOT observed.
Rfing anything else that a person may be doing, as long as they are not engaging in the target behaviour. Because the “other” behaviours are not necessarily specified, no particular behaviours will reliably receive reinforcement. Therefore, any paricular acts are unlikely to increase very much, if at all. However, does not require the same degree of vigilance as rfing specific alternative behaviours as DRA. DRO is not response dependent, because no particular alternative response is required.
For e.g. a girl who picks the skin of her palm is given a token (1 min of Candy Crush) for every 15mins that she doesn’t pick her palm
DRA
rf schedule in which a functional alternative to an undesirable target behaviour is reinforced while treating or witholding rf for unwanted behaviour.
E.g. A student is offered both praise and attention when saying “excuse me” and waiting for a response rather than shouting out.
Advantages and Disadvantages of DRO
Advantages:
- Widely applicable: easy to use when compared to the dense rf required of DRA.
- Relatively rapid
- Often durable
Disadvantages:
- May return to previous problem behaviour: If the ‘other’ behaviour produces reinforcers of lesser value, or requires more time or effort to attain reinforcers of equivalent value, returning to the previously (maladaptive) behaviour is more likely.
- Fails the “dead man’s test”: Though rf is the main application in DRO, the procedure is not necessariyl constructive. Because it might neglect targeting a beneficial replacement behaviour. If rfs are provided for not blurting out, a dead man’s lack of behaviour could qualify him for receiving those reinforcers. DRO does not teach how to behave.
- Risks reinforcing other unwanted behaviours.
- Behaviour contrast: When using DRO you must ensure that the targeted behaviour does not receive rf at other times. Otherwise, if the beahvioru is placed on a DRO in some contexts it may increase in contexts where rf is available.
Advantages and disadvantages of DRA
Advantages -
Constructive: Identify one or more alternative beneficial behaviours. They learn what to do instead of what not to do.
Benign: Rfs continue so a carefully planned programme will yield regular rf and all the good things that go along with it.
Acceptable
Lasting change
Disadvantages -
Effect may be delayed: RF procedures can take time to produce results, particularly if the alternative resp is not firmly established in the client’s repertoire.
DRI
DRI (subclass of DRA) but with a further restriction: the alternative behaviour can't be emitted simultaneously with the unwanted behaviour. Uses a replacement behaviour that can't be performed at the same time as the target behaviour.
DRL
Used when you want to reduce the frequency of a behaviour, not extinguish it. Rf is provided when the behaviours frequency is below a certain criteria.
Total count IOA
Dividing one observer’s data by another’s data and multiplying by 100. E.g. 28 target behavs and other observed 31. 28/31 x 100.
Disadvantage: if two observers agree on the total number of behaviours, they may have recorded “occurences” at entirely different times. For e.g if 50 intervals, one observer may record a behaviour as occurring, while the other records a non-occurrence. May end up being 100% because they each observed it occuring 25 times each but at different times.
Mean Count per interval IOA
calculating a percentage of agreement within each interval and then averaging the total averages. E.g. two observers recording over 10 trials.
Exact count per interval IOA
Percentage of exact agreement intervals between observers. Most conservative way to measure IOA and tends to underestimate.
Trial by trial or point-by-point or total interval IOA
Much like exact count but useful for discrete trial data.
Observers would either agree or disagree on each trial’s success, and record their data.
Tends to overestimate
Event Recording IOA
- Total count IOA
- Mean count per interval IOA
- Exact count per interval IOA
- Trial by Trial
Timing/Interval Recording
- Interval by interval
- Scored interval ( best for low rates of occurences)
- Unscored interval (best for high rates of occurrences)
Baseline logic - Prediction
Prediction that if no changes occur in the subject’s environment subsequent measures will fall within the range of values obtained thus far.
Baseline logic - Verification
Can be accomplished by demostrating that prior level of baseline responding would have remained unchanged had the IV not been introduced.
Baseline logic - Replication
Repeating IV manipulations conducted previously in the study and obtaining similar outcomes.