s 220 Theft by person in a special relationship Flashcards

1
Q

Is the value of the property relevant to being prosecuted?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some examples of special relationships?

A

1 - Lawyer: funds in their trust fund
2 - CD: money raised from the public on very strict terms
3 - Liquidator: assets of the company winding up
4 - Rent collector banks: landlord’s bank account etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the Actus Reus elements?

A

1- D must have received/have possession/ control over the property

2- Terms which received/obtained possession/control required them to account to/deal with the property/proceeds in accordance with the requirements of another person

3- D accounted/dealt w property/its proceeds otherwise than in accordance w those requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is the 1st AR element of control determined?

A

1- Don’t have to own it & doesn’t have to be in their possession

2- Have to have determined how property is going to be used & dealt with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In the AR case of R v Sullivan what was held?

A

Need to determine who has actual control & who making decisions re: company’s property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is the 2nd & 3rd AR elements of control determined?

A

1- Req s1 2 come in2 prop on terms that require them to deal w that property due to 2 requirements of s1 else

2- CL requirements fiduciary ownership to property but you’re managing it on behalf of someone else

3- Having a fiduciary relationship & managing a person’s funds doesn’t mean u have a duty 2 account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Scale

A

Wasn’t TSR as didn’t receive the cheque on terms requiring him to account for it. Had debt pay it back.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Kirk

A

Took > commission than entitled, receiving funds on behalf of a draper. Not theft as ownership went to him but got $ on terms had pay comm& expected 2 a/c for what received. Had debt to draper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Prior

A

Companies knew the company going into receivership, so withdrew all company funds. Every time Dir uses a c’s money doesn’t create an obligation to account to c. Specific fiduciary requirements always depend on circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nisbet v R

A

2 people shareholders agreement. Mr N owned land thru another company & sold it to the new company. Misused funds so convicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the Mens Rea elements?

A

1- D knew requirements to account or deal w the property or its proceeds; and

2- D intentionally dealt w the property or any proceeds otherwise than in accordance w those requirements

3- People must know and intentionally deal

4 - Don’t have to know that the requirements constitute a special relationship, just have to know that the requirements exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly