Rylands V Fletcher Flashcards
Rylands v Fletcher- governed by
Rylands v Fletcher + common law
Claimant- the claimant is someone with an equitable interest in the land, this can be due to an equitable interest as its owner or has exclusive possession (tenant)
Hunter v Canary Wharf
Defendant- a D must have some control over the land which the material is stored
Read v Lyons
A bringing onto the land and accumulating- it must be a non natural process that has caused it to accumulate
Rylands v fletcher
A bringing onto the land and accumulating- no liability for thing naturally accumulating on the land
Giles v walker
Likely to cause mischief if it escapes- the thing itself doesn’t have to be inherently dangerous
Shiffman
Likely to cause mischief if it escapes- the thing must be likely to cause mischief if it escapes
Hale
Does escape and causes damage (step1)- there must be an escape from the land the D controls (1) OR from circumstances over which the D has control (2)
- Hunt
- Hale
Does escape and causes damage (step1)- the thing brought onto the land must escape and cause damage NOT a by product of it
Stannard v Gore
Does escape and causes damage (step2)- the thing that has escaped must have caused damage
Read v Lyons
Does escape and causes damage (step2)- personal injury damage is not recoverable under Rylands v fletcher
Cambridge water Co v Eastern counties leather plc
Foreseeable damage- the damage caused must be reasonably foreseeable, otherwise it is too remote and the claim will fail
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc
A non-natural use of the land- the use of the land must be exceptionally dangerous or extraordinary or unusual circumstances
Transco v Stockport MBC
Non-natural use of the land- a potentially dangerous activity will be a non natural use of the land
Cambridge water co v eastern counties leather plc
Non-natural use of the land- things stored in large quantities will be a non-natural use of the land
Mason v levy