Rylands v Fletcher Flashcards
What are the four elements that must be proved in order for there to be a successful claim under this strict liability tort?
- The bringing on to land and accumulation
- Of a thing likely to cause mischief if it escapes
- Which amounts to a non-natural use of land
- Which does escape and causes reasonable foreseeable damage to adjoining property
Who can be a claimant?
Someone who has an interest in the land
Who can be a defendant?
Someone who owns the land or occupies it
What must there be a bringing onto land of?
Accumulation of a substance
If the thing is already naturally present on the land, can there be liability?
No; Giles v walker
Is there liability for a thing that naturally accumulates on the land?
No, Ellison v Ministry of Defence
The thing which the D brings on the land must be likely to do what?
Mischief if it escapes. It is not the escape that has to be foreseeable only the damage caused. Rylands v Fletcher, Hale v Jenning, Stannard v Gore
What is meant by there must be a non-natural use of land?
This does not mean a use that is artificial or man-made, this means a use which is not common place, Transco v Southport MBC, the use was considered and Lord Bingham stated that the test should be that the use of land will only be non-natural if it is ‘extraordinary and unusual’ on the particular circumstances and time
Reads v Lyon
There was no escape so the claimant could not claim
What are the defences for Rylands v fletcher?
Consent
Contributory negligence
Act of stranger
Act of god
Statutory authority
What are the remedies for Rylands v fletcher?
Damages