rylands v fletcher Flashcards

1
Q

what are the 4 points of rylands

A

the bringing onto the land an accumulation or storage
of a thing likely to cause mischief if it escapes
which amounts to a non-natural use of the land
which does escape and causes reasonably foreseeable damage to adjoining property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain rylands v fletcher

A

workers failed to block off mineshafts when working and they flooded causing damage to neighbouring land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who is a potential claimant

A

anyone who as an interest in the land affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who is a potential defendant

A

the owner or occupier of the land that satisfies the four tests to rylands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what cases is used for the bringing onto the land

A

Giles v Walker, Ellison v ministry of defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened in Giles v Walker

A

weeds spread to a neighbouring land and naturally grew there
no liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Ellison v ministry of defence

A

rainwater caused a flooding, rainwater naturally occurs so there was no liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the test for it to likely cause mischief

A

The damage caused must be foreseeable not the escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What cases is used for causing mischief

A

Hale v Jennings Bros, stannard v gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain Hale v Jennings Bros

A

A fairground ride became detached and caused injury, decided that it was likely to cause injury if the ride came loose
successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain stannard v gore

A

A fire from tyres escaped and caused damage to neighbouring property
First found liable then not as the tyres were not dangerous or mischievous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case is used for non natural use of the land

A

Cambridge water v leather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain Cambridge water v leather

A

chemicals were stored in a factory and spread to pollute

the storage of chemicals was a non natural use of the land as it was always dangerous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what case is sued for the thing escaping

A

Read v Lyons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Read v Lyons

A

an inspector was injured when a bomb went off in a munitions factory
not liable as the thing must escape to somewhere beyond the defendants occupation or control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What defences are available

A

Consent, act of a stranger, act of god, statutory authority and contributory negligence

17
Q

Explain consent

A

no liability where claimant consented to the thing

18
Q

Explain act of a stranger

A

if someone the defendant has no control over causes the escape there is no liability

19
Q

Explain act of god

A

no liability if something happens beyond human control

20
Q

Explain statutory authority

A

an act of parliament authorising the actions can be a defence

21
Q

Explain contributory negligence

A

damages would be reduced if the claimant was involved in the escape of the thing

22
Q

What was suggested to replace rylands and by who

A

Pearson commission said it should be replaced with a statutory scheme for injuries suffered in hazardous activities