Rylands and Fletcher Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are steps for Rylands and Fletcher?

A

Damages
Who can sue
Who can be sued
Non-natural
Was the thing dangerous
Escape
Defences
Remedies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can sue in RaF?

A

Someone who has an interest in the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who can be sued in RaF?

A

Occupiers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of non-natural?

A

The occupier brought it to the land for “some special use bringing with it an increased danger to others. It must not merely be the ordinary use of the land or such a use as is proper for the general benefit of the community”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can the ‘thing’ be fire?

A

No, must be the thing that is on fire that escapes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of dangerous in RaF?

A

A reasonable person would foresee danger if the thing escapes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the definition of escape?

A

The thing moved from one person’s area of control to another person’s area of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What defences are available for RaF?

A

Statutory authority
Act of a stranger
Volenti (common benefit)
Act of God
Contributory negligence (default)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What remedies are available for RaF?

A

Compensation for damages
Injunctions (rare)
Abatements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case shows that something that grew naturally (e.g. plants or water) cannot be used?

A

Giles v Walker - thistles grew without being planted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which case defined non-natural?

A

Rickards v Lothian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Lord Bingham add to the non-natural definition?

A

Extraordinary, unusual at one place or one time, but not so at another place or time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the locality rule?

A

If factory in residential area, then can be sued
If factory in industrial area, then not sued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case shows that just because it offers employment, that does not constitute common benefit?

A

Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case shows gas is dangerous?

A

Batchellor v Tunbridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case shows electricity is dangerous?

A

Nat Telephone v Baker

17
Q

Which case shows poisonous fumes are dangerous?

A

West v Bristol

18
Q

Which case shows tree branches are dangerous?

A

Crowhurst v Amersham

19
Q

Which case shows no interest in the land?

A

Weller v Foot & Mouth Disease Research

20
Q

Which case shows can only sue occupiers, not landowner?

A

Smith v Scott

21
Q

What kind of damages can RaF cover?

A

Property damage only

22
Q

Which case shows fire cannot be the thing that escapes?

A

Stannard v Gore