russia Alexander II and III Flashcards
what was the % of peasants in 1917
80%
What forces helped keep Nicholas II in power?
The Okhrana (secret police), the Imperial Guard and the Cossacks
when was Nicholas I in power
1825-1855
when was Alexander II in power
1855-1881
when was Alexander III in power
1881-1894
when was Nicholas II in power
1894-1917
Who were the opposition groups to Nicholas II in 1917?
Social Democrats - Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, Social Revolutionaries - Left and Right, Liberals - Oktoberists and Kadets
when was the Crimean war
oct 1853- feb 1856
what did the crimean war highlight to russia
- they were convinced that they were going to win because they believed that they had the biggest and best army however, they were defeated causing huge humiliation to the country.
- showed that they were a long way behind the west
- defeat hastened the need for change
what did alexander II say about the fear of revolt
“It would be better to abolish serfdom from above then for it to be abolished from below.”
when was the Emancipation Ukases act
1861
what did the emanciaption act involve?
- Serfs released from ownership become free men. They could marry, travel, vote in local elections and trade freely.
- Each serf family entitled to keep its cottage and land.
- Landlords would receive compensation form the government in bonds for lost land.
what were the disadvantages of the emancipation act
- The serfs were still under the control of the Mir, whose power increased.
- Serfs were required to pay redemption payments for the land they had gained
- They had to pay these over 49 years and there was a 6 % interest change
- They had to remain within their ‘Mir’ (commune) until they had made their full redemption payment
what was the impact on the people (emancipation)
- This meant that the serfs didn’t really benefit as they weren’t really free as they still had to pay for the land (usually quite poor land) that they owned which meant that they couldn’t really grow enough food for their families and especially not being able to sell it.
- Nobles didn’t really benefit either as they had lost their serfs and land. For this the government gave them compensation for their loss.
- Tsar tried to make everyone more equal however the higher classes didn’t really appreciate this as they didn’t want to be associated with the serfs.
- Some radical intelligentsia reacted badly to the terms of the emancipation as they felt the emancipation had protected the nobles and betrayed the serfs; this led to a growth in opposition
when were the military reforms of Alexander II
1861-1881
what were the main changes in the military reform
- Universal conscription was introduced: all social classes were liable for military service at the age of 21. Generally, ¼ would be chosen by lot to serve. This could be avoided if medical evidence was provided or deferred for students to complete their studies.
- Military service was reduced to 15 years, 6 of which were active and 9 years in reserve. Reserve increased from 210,000 to 550,000 from 1862 to 1870.
- Officer training was improved
- Modern riffles and artillery were introduced but this was a slow process and technological progress in weaponry meant that some weapons were superseded begore they were fully introduced.
- Conditions improved for the ordinary soldiers e.g. they were housed in barracks
- Reduction in the number of offences that carried corporal punishment and flogging was abolished.
what were the consequences of the military reforms
- The reforms were a genuine attempt to break down class privilege but it resulted in a smaller but more professional army
- The nobles maintained a high proportion of officers and Alexander III restricted entry to officer training to nobles when he became Tsar.
- This reform saved money for the government as it was a smaller army and it was supported by trained reserve soldiers which could be brought in and mobilised.
- The Nobility opposed these reforms as they didn’t want their children mixing with the lower class. They preferred the old systems where their sons went into the army as volunteers but returned as war heroes.
- Peasant conscripts were mainly relied on as they were uneducated and illiterate which reduced the effectiveness of their training.
why did the military reforms need to introduced
defeat in the crimean war meant that they had been humiliated as it was on home soil and they also believed that they were going to win.
when were the censorship reforms
1860’s
what did the censorship reforms involve
- Newspapers, books and periodicals didn’t have to submit to priory censorship.
- Newspapers could discuss government policy - editors were given more freedom.
what happened after the censorship reform was introduced
- More books and periodicals were published under the more relaxed stance.
- Some editors wanted to try and push the boundaries more of what they could publish.
- People were more critical of the government e.g. when reporting court cases.
- Some reported on social issues that the government couldn’t prohibit them from reporting.
why was the relaxation of censorship a risky factor for the Tsar
the public started having ideas as they were being informed about things in more detail than before. This was risky for the autocratic government as it meant that there was a higher chance of opposition which the government wouldn’t be able to control as the peasant population seriously outweighed the nobels and tsar class
when were the education reforms introduced
1863-1864
what happened in the education reforms
- In the first decade the number of pupils doubled. New primary schools were built and were open to all classes. Between 1856-78 the number of primary schools increased from 8000 to 25,000 with a million attending
- Secondary schools were also improving and the number of pupils doubled in the 1860’s. The curriculum was also extended including classics like Latin and Greek and modern subjects like science, maths and languages
- Universities could govern themselves e.g. design their courses, chose their own professors etc.
- Women could attend but not take degrees.
- The number of students grew from 4,000 to 16,000 from 1865 to 1899.
consequences of the education reforms
- The increase of primary students had a huge impact in the long term as more literate peasant population took on new aspirations.
- The regime needed students trained to high standards to build modern state bit it di not want them to question the regime. However higher education tended to foster an independent spirit and critical mind. Students began to pay a more significant part in society.
- Many students relied on student funding and were poor and undernourished. They formed mutual-aid groups organising communal kitchen and libraries. They reacted against poor teaching, the strict regulations and the heavy-handed action of the authorities and the police
- Ministry of education took some control of schools away from the zemstva
- Restriction and crackdown on university
- Once again reform had resulted in people questioning the political authority of the regime.
why did the education act need to be put in place
the majority of the population (serfs) were uneducated. This meant it was harder for Russia to modernise and they were unskilled meaning they couldn’t industrialise
when were the local government reforms
1864
what happened in the local government reforms
- zemstva bought improvements to the areas in which they operated
- nobles began to gain political experience in managing their own affairs and many wanted to see this at a national level
- professional third element began to make demands for social reforms and improvements to living conditions
what were the limitations of the local government reforms
- zemstva were only introduced in a limited number of provinces- so they were slow to get going and did not achieve earlier on
- dominated by nobility- many nobles didn’t take their responsibilities
- peasants don’t really participate, put off by nobility and they resented paying the zemstva tax which was proportionately higher on the land than on private estates
what is the zemstva
- elected district and provincial councils
- were elected by the nobles,town dwellers and peasants
- 40%- nobles and 70%- of provincial councils
- flourished until october 1917
how many provinces were the zemstva in
19 provinces
But, by 1914 it increased to 37 out of 50 provinces
when were the judicial reforms
1864
what were the problems before the judicial reforms
- Variety of courts, cases could be transferred between each which could take years.
- Most judges had inefficient legal training and were illiterate.
- Court secretaries could, were relied on – many relied on bribes.
- Judges had to adjudicate according to a set of rules (Had to take the word of a noble over a peasant, man over a woman).
- Judges never saw the defendant so the written evidence wasn’t challenged
- Police could levy fines, were also open to bribery.
what were the main features of the judicial reforms
- It was simplified and there were fewer courts than previously, each provenance had its own court.
- Judges had a good salary and couldn’t be removed from office
- Civil and criminal courts were open to the public and were recorded and reported.
- Jury trials were introduced for more severe cases (takes it out of government control). There were now prosecutors and defenders and the juries’ votes were kept secret.
- Justices of the Peace (JPs) were established. Magistrates elected by the council who dealt with small cases.
- Offences only concerning peasants were reviewed in separate village courts with a judge from the peasantry.
what were the advantages of the judicial reforms
• Russians had access to a fairer trial and a better access to justice (e.g. through JPs). The defendant had more protection since the proceedings were public and less likely to be susceptible to corruption.
• JPs’ courts worked quickly and didn’t cost anything to those appearing in them. Respected as they protected the small man.
• During the 1860s and 70s an independent profession came into being, fulfilling the jobs of prosecutors and defenders. Many became advocates for reform, some later became parliamentarians and some revolutionaries.
• Challenged the authority of autocracy
o Independent courts and judges meant an independent authority, introduced the idea of the rule of law.
o Courtrooms were the only place of genuine free speech in Russia so lawyers and defendants often challenged the government and spoke out against the regime there.
o The new juries were also independent and would acquit people who the regime would see locked away for a long period.