Russia 1906-1917 Flashcards
How did thee Fundamental laws change between 1905 and 1906?
- 1905: Nicholas II had promised that steps would be taken to ensure that no law could be passed without the Duma’s approval and further undertook to give the Duma powers.
- 1906: , The drafting of the Fundamental Laws became an exercise in clawing back as much political ground as possible. Government ministers, with the Tsar’s full encouragement, set out to restrict the powers of the Duma to the barest minimum required by the wording of the October Manifesto
Why did the Tsar have the ability to change the Fundamental laws?
- The regime was under major attack in 1905 but the following year, the regime had been saved.
What were some features of the fundamental laws?
-‘The All-Russian Emperor possesses the supreme autocratic power. Not only fear and conscience, but God himself, command obedience to his authority.’
- The Fundamental Laws gave the tsar the right to dissolve the Duma at any time of his choosing.
- allowed the tsar to proclaim new laws without Duma approval at times when it was not in session.
What role did the tsar have in the members of the Duma?
- The tsar alone had the right to appoint and dismiss government ministers. There was no requirement to seek Duma approval.
What were positive aspects of the Fundamental Laws?
- Freedom of assembly
- Freedom of association
- Freedom of speech
Why did relations in the First Duma deteriorate?
- The duma was too radical in its approach when it demanded the full democratisation of Russia, radical land reform and amnesty for all political exiles.
Why did the Government dissolve the First Duma?
- The Duma called for the Government to resign its power.
- The Duma also began to debate a land reform programme which they knew was unacceptable to the Tsar and his ministers.
What was the Vyoberg manifesto?
- 200 Duma members who fled to Finland called upon their fellow-citizens to refuse to pay taxes until the Duma was restored.
Why did the Vyoberg manifesto fail?
- Russians were drained from the revolutionary movement of 1905 and didn’t take to the streets.
How were elections to the second Duma different to the first Duma?
- In 1907, the revolutionary socialist parties (SRs, Mensheviks and Bolsheviks) participated in the elections rather than boycotting them as they had done in 1906.
The Government disrupted electioneering by the opposition parties and secretly financed the campaigns of favoured extreme right-wing candidates
What was the political makeup of the Second Duma?
- The second Duma was more polarised between left and right than the first but, from the government’s point of view, it was no more amenable.
Why did Stolypin dissolve the Second Duma?
- He was frustrated by the second Duma’s obstructiveness and dissolved it on the basis that Bolshevik members were involved in treasonable activity.
How did Stolypin change the duma electoral system for the future dumas?
- Designed a system where a new one would reduce the representation in the Duma of peasants, workers and national minorities.
- The nobility were able to elect half of the Duma whilst the peasantry were only able to elect one-fifth of the Duma.
What was the Tsar’s thoughts on the Duma?
- Nicholas II loathed the Duma and made little attempt to conceal his feelings towards it.
Which party did Nicholas openly support?
- The Union of Russian People Party.
Why did Nicholas loath the Duma?
- he believed that its existence was an affront to the principle of autocracy he felt he had a duty to uphold.
What was Nicholas’s involvement in the day to day running of the Duma?
- Nicholas left the day to day running of the Duma to his ministers, and never addressed the Duma again as he had done in the 1906 opening ceremony.
Which political parties dominated the Third Duma?
- The third Duma was dominated by the Octobrists, the largest single party with 154 seats, and around 150 pro-regime right-wingers.
Which political parties dominated the Fourth Duma?
- . In the fourth Duma, the right-wing parties were a little stronger, the Octobrists a little weaker.
What was the name of the Octoberist leader in 1905?
- Alexander Guchkov
What did Alexander Guchkov claim about post-1905 Russia?
- It was not an autocracy.
What did Guchkov complain about in 1908?
- The amount of military positions given up to the Tsar’s family (nepotism)
What did Guchkov complain about in 1912?
- He complained about the growing influence of Rasputin which angered both the Tsar and his wife as they saw Rasputin as a man who had cured their son;s haemophilia.
Why was the Duma powerless and emphasised the lack of lawful order in Russia?
- The Tsar and his ministers such as Stolypin were able to prevent the Duma from making legislative changes, therefore ruling as autocrats, no different to life before 1905.