Rules Flashcards
Attorney Client Privilege
Communication to get legal advice Between a client And a lawyer That is confidential Unless it concerns future crime or future fraud.
Execution of an innocent person
Lawyer may reveal the confession if execution is reasonably certain, but need not reveal the information.
Privileged? “What is your client’s name?”
Not Usually
Rule of Evidence 502– When waiver is intentional
The party must disclose other communications or information
- -concerning the same subject
- -that ought in fairness be considered
Rule of Evidence 502– When the disclosure is inadvertent
The privilege-holder may take back the information if
- -The privilege holder took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure
- -The privilege holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify
- -but if it happens again in six months. . . rule may not protect.
Clergy Communicant Privledge
Communicant holds privilege Clergy Communication Confidential To seek spiritual guidance
Psychotherapist-Patient
Patient holds privilege Psychotherapist Communication Confidential To obtain psychotherapy
Spousal Privilege
Two types that overlap
- -Testimonial
- -Confidences
Spousal Testimonial Privilege
In criminal cases:
Spouse may refuse to testify
If still married –ends upon divorce
About anything learned before or during the marriage
Policy interest? To protect the marriage
Marital Communications Privilege
Party can PREVENT spouse from testifying In civil and criminal cases Even if divorced Only about confidential communications --No privilege for observations --No privilege for communications before marriage Policy Interest? Free Communication
Impeachment Techniques
--Show impaired perception or memory Demonstrate inconsistencies Inconsistent statements subject to FRE 613 --Show bias Attack character for truthfulness --Reputation/opinion, FRE 608(a) --Untruthful conduct, FRE 608(b) --Criminal convictions, FRE 609
Rule 607
Any party may attack the credibility of any witness
–When would you attack your own witness?
Hostile witness
Witness changes story
To “draw the sting”
FRE 613
Prior Inconsistent Statements
- -inconsistencies on material v. collateral issues
- -For impeachment only
- -No extrinsic evidence on collateral matters
FRE 801(d)(1)(A)
Prior Inconsistent Testimony
–Witness available and statement give under oath at a previous hearing
–Exempted hearsay: for truth of matter asserted
FRE 608(b)
Can ask about specific dishonest acts on cross
IF
you have a good faith belief they occurred, BUT no extrinsic evidence may be introduced, (i.e. you must accept denials from the witness and move on.)