Rulemaking & Adjudication Flashcards
types of agency actions
- rulemaking
2. adjudication
outcome of agency rulemaking
rule
agency rule
statement of general or specific applicability
that operates like a statute
with a future effect of
implementing law or describing agency procedure
outcome of adjudication
order
agency adjudication
application of agency law to a fairly discrete group of entities that often turns on the application of existing law to a particular set of facts (like a judicial decision)
- operates like “mini law-making”
- mostly retrospective
- can be somewhat prospective by placing others “on notice”
rulemaking process
- informal (aka notice & comment) s553
2. formal (APA s556/557)
informal aka notice & comment
- covered by APA s 553
- large category, dominant mode
- contains trigger clause to push to formal
- lots of ex parte disclosure
ex: rules promulgated under the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act regarding Patient Safety Organizations . . . notice and comments
APA Notice Elements
- statement of time, place, and nature of proceeding
- reference to legal authority under which rule proposed
- terms or substance of proposed rule
- invitation for comment
comment period
usually 60d
informal rule timeline
notice
comment period 60d
comment considerations
final rule
exceptions to notice/comment period
- agency issuing interpretive read
- internal operations procedure
- rules that reduce regulation
* * Emergency Executive Orders (ex: vaccine mandate) – effective immediately via final rule w/6mos. period for traditional notice/comment period
trigger language for formal rulemaking
rules required by statute to be made “on the record after opportunity for agency hearing” –> applies 556/557 instead of 553 (ex: Dodd Frank)
formal adjudication process
- APA rules
- provides standards of review
- most dominate form of adjudiciation
- trial-type substantive evidence on the record
Chevron 1984 case
facts: statute = Clearn Air Act Amendments
Carter Administration: apply the law distributive sense to each smoke stack
Reagan: applying the law collectively smoke stack to entire plan “bubble approach”
Chevron’s 2-step test for evaluating agency statute
- 2-step test for evaluating agency statute:
1) . has Congress spoke directly to the precise issue? Intent of congress? If yes –> use that. No –> #2
2) . silent/ambiguous: is the agency’s interpretation reasonable? Y–> uphold. N–> maybe strike down, remand for considerations, etc.