Rulemaking Flashcards
Do rules have a future or retroactive effect?
Rules have a future effect, unless an agency’s organic statute explicitly authorizes a retroactive effect.
True or False:
Agencies have discretion to make rules to avoid adjudication if they have to power to do both
True. The decision whether to make policy by rulemaking or adjudication is a decision to be made by the agency in its informed discretion (Chenery)
What is the difference between Legislative and Non-Legislative rules?
Do agencies need statutory authorization to make either of these?
- *Legislative** rules affect legal rights, theres rule are “law” becuase they have binding legal effect.
- Statutory authorization is requred to issue legislative rules
- *Non-Legislative** rules are not “law,” it is much easier to issue these, they play a weaker legal role, more like precedents
- Statutory authorization not required to issue non-legislative rules
What are the two types of Legislative rules?
Are they subject to §553?
Substantive: majority of the rules we look at, are subject to §553
Procedural: not subject to §553
What are the two types of Non-Legislative rules?
Are they subject to §553?
Interpretive: not subject to §553
Policy statements: not subject to §553
Does PDP apply to general law making?
Why or why not?
What is the exception?
PDP simply DOES NOT APPLY to general lawmaking.
The political process and the APA are enough of a safegaurd (Bi-Metallic)
Exception: PDP is required only when the proceeding is functionally equivalent to an adjudication, when small number of people are effected, not a general law of general applicability (Londoner)
Formal Rulemaking is triggered by what language?
Where is this found in the APA?
“hearing on the record”
(Florida East Coast)
Triggering language to implicate FR under §556 and §557 is found in §553(c)
What three stages of procedure are required under formal rulemaking?
- Planning stage with notice
- Trial stage with oral testimony and documentary evidence, cross examination and trial
- Decision stage
What two APA statutes govern FR?
§556 & §557
What is main difference between FR and IR?
IR requires only §553, which requres just four steps for the adoption of legislative rules:
- Notice published
- Opportunity to participate(w/ or w/out oral presentation)
- Statement of angency’s basis and purpose
- Publishing of the rule
Informal rulemaking requires no hearing in the sense of oral presentation or live testimony, does not require that material be submitted in testimonial form or under oath, no opportunity for cross-examination or rebuttal is mandated
What are the benefits of FR?
Trial type hearings are said to facilitate the full development of information necessary to the formulation of reasonable regulatory policies
Only trial type hearings give people a genuine opportunity to question the agency’s factual premises
What are the three basic requirements of Informal Rulemaking?
- Published notice of the proposed rulemaking
- Opportunity for public comment
- After consideration of the comments, publication of the final rule toghether with a concise general statement of the rule’s basis and purpose
The holding from Motor Vehicles v. State Farm requires what out of an agency’s statute?
Requires a rational connection between the facts and the conclusion
Rulemaking - Procedural Requirements of §553
- Notice and Opportnity for comment
What are the three requirements this requirement?
- Agency must adequately respond to the comments
- Agency must disclose the evidence upon which the rule relies on (doesnt have to disclose the stuff that it doesnt rely on)
- Rule must be a logical outgrowth of the proposed rule
§553 only applies to (blank) rules
Substantive legislative rules