Rule of Law Flashcards
What is the rule of law? (main principles)
- No one is above the law and everyone is subject to the law
- establishes a relationship between government and people
- the law is always applied
Main practical effects of the rule of law in the UK?
- Courts will strike down government action which is not in line with the rule of law
- Courts try to give legislation a meaning compatible with the rule of law
- Courts generally hold legislation to be invalid if it cannot be interpreted compatibly with rule of law
Procedural/Formal Law?
Consists of a set of rules that govern the proceedings of the court. The courts must adhere to these standards which are set out. These rules ensure consistency and fair practice in the process.
Substantive Law?
Type of law deals with the legal process between the people and the state. Defines the rights and duties of people. Concerns morality.
Dicey’s seminal formal rule of law is threefold:
Equality before the law; absence of arbitrary powers; common law decisions in our constitution
AV Dicey ensures a …
‘government of law’ not a ‘government of men’
Case for Dicey’s “Equality before the law”
M v Home Office
Case for Dicey’s “Absence of arbitrary powers”
Entick v Carrington
Case for Dicey’s “common law protecting the rights of the people/ common law rights”
Unison v Lord Chancellor
Formalists?
Dicey
Raz
Ugner
Substantivists?
Dworkin
Allan
Jowell
What does the Dr Bonham case stand for?
Principle that legislation passed by parliament is subordinate to common law decisions made by judges, and any other statute that is contrary to “common law right or reason” must be void
Coke’s Obiter Dicta (from Dr Bonham case)?
- Rule of law is the rule of reason, not man
- Courts are trained in legal reasoning
- Monarch and Parliament are political actors
- Courts are better arbiters of law than political actors
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Rule of Law = Jackson v Attorney General
A House of Lords case noted for containing obiter dicta comments made by the judiciary to suggest that there may be limits to Parliamentary Sovereignty
OD? Bingham and PS =
“PS is the ‘bedrock’ of the British Constitution”
OD? Hope and PS =
“PS is not longer, if it was ever, absolute”
OD? Hale and Rule of Law =
“The courts will treat with suspicion (and may even reject) any attempt to subvert the rule of law”
OD? Steyn and Constitution/Human Rights =
“We do not in the UK have an unconditional constitution. It is a legal order in which the UK assumes obligation to protect Human Rights”
Lord Bingham’s 8 principles of the rule of law:
- Law must be clear, accessible and intelligible to all
- Should be governed by law and not discretion
- Equality before the law
- Ministers must act within limit and not exceed their powers
- Law must give adequate protection of human rights
- Law must provide access to justice/Dispute resolution
- State must provide a fair trial
- State should comply with international law
M v Home Office?
Home secretary did not comply .. said that the Crown chose to obey the law, rather than being compelled to
This is not true - the Crown ministers are just as subject to the law as any other person
(No one is above the law)
Entick v Carrington?
Court refused to accept that a government minister in absence of any common law or statutory authority had any power to grant warrants permitting entry and search of a private property
(No arbitrary powers)
Unison v Lord Chancellor
Lord Chancellor raised tribunal fees to reflect commercial reality but the supreme court quashed this as incompatible with common law
Cited Lord Coke’s opinion that justice cannot at common law be bought or sold, it is a public good
(Common law rights)
Raz
Formalist
- Rule of law is a pre-condition of individual liberty
- Key formal qualities include that the law must be certain and prospective but not that it must be ethically right
Raz’s 6 principles:
- Prospective but not retroactive laws
- Publicly and clearly stated
- Stable and not changed often
- Independent Judiciary
- Everyone has access to courts and fair trail
- Law enforcement should not undermine legal rules