Rule 57 - (1/5 MT) Provisional Remedies Flashcards
Purposes of Preliminary Attachment
- secure satisfaction of judgment that may be rendered in favor of the claimant-applicant
- acquire JD over the action by actual [or] constructive NOTICE of the property where personal service or substituted service of summons CANNOT be effected
- to continue hearing a case even if the court does NOT actually serve the summons personally upon the defendant, especially when the defendant is NOT residing in the Phil & is not found in the Philippines at the time of the purported service of summons
Knowledge Check: Kinds of Jurisdiction
- JD over the sm
- JD over the person of the defendant
- JD over the res
- JD over the issue
knowledge check: situations where the court will have difficulty serving summons on the defendant
- def’t outside Phil
- def’t not residing in the Phil
- def’t is not found in the Phil at the time of the commencement of the action, for the case to continue, the court has to acquire JD over the res
Chinese borrowed money from you. You demand payment on due date you found that the Chinese has left to his country.
Can you file a case against him?
What is the effect if summons do not arrive to him?
An action for sum of money cannot prosper as service of summons in person is required for the court to acquire JD
If Chinese has properties, file a motion for PA in connection with the case so the action in persona converts to action quasi in rem thereby applying Rule 14 Sec. 17, file a motion asking for leave of court to serve summons by publication
GR: cannot summons by publication in action in persona
XPN: action in persona is converted to action in rem or action quasi in rem
[B]
It is irrelevant & immaterial whether the copy of the summons is received by the defendant for as long as the court acquires JD over the res by attachment, then the court may continue hearing the case
Salient Characteristics of a Writ of PA
- ancillary to main action
- a provisional remedy
- in the nature of a proceeding quasi in rem altho referred sometimes as action in rem
- grant of PA is discretionary
[1, 2] - if case dismissed, so will it
when is a writ of PA considered to be in the nature of a quasi in rem proceeding?
PA is considered a quasi in rem proceeding if;
- the def’t is personally served summons [or]
- the def’t personally appears during the hearing of the case
[but] there is still an application and issuance of the writ of PA like when the def’t is poised to dispose of his properties to defraud his creditors
knowledge check: if your grant of PA is denied, what is your remedy?
Not appeal but Certiorari under Rule 65
Who may apply for Writ of PA?
- plaintiff
- any other proper party (defendant w/ counterclaim, cross claim, or third-party complaint)
Gal crashed to Gra’s car. Gra filed case due to Gal’s fault and demanded payment/compensation.
in Gal’s answer, he puts a compulsory counterclaim was because of Gra’s negligence & liable for damages. (not in the nature of permissive cc)
ccc: inter twinned with main cause of action
can he file a Preliminary Attachment
Yes
You are filing a case against a non-resident defendant and it’s not found in the Philippines. You are filing a case against a foreigner who is already outside the Philippines at the time of the commencement of the action. So if only for the case to continue, what should you do?
apply for a writ of PA so that when the court grants the same, you may request by leave of court to service summons by publication and once served by publication, the court may proceed to continue the hearing of the case
how is an action in persona converted in action in rem through the issuance of a writ of PA?
def’t does not actually participate during the proceedings, then writ of PA becomes an action in rem because in the main, the primary action is now the the property subject matter of litigation.
how is an action in rem converted to action in quasi in rem?
ordinarily, the issuance of a PA is in the nature of action quasi in rem. It becomes an action in rem if & when the def’t is NOT personally served with summons & def’t does NOT voluntarily appear before the court.
where there is a
- cause and reason, or
- compelling ground for issuance of PA,
then writ of PA is correctable by what?
search warrant.
In that context, the judge may be considered as having acted w/ great abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of JD
remedy when Gra and Gal obtained a loan but Gal received nothing and the obligation fell due and now Tor is now filing a case against Gra and Gal.
what is the remedy in this common situation?
In Gal’s answer, on the ground that he did not receive any of the proceeds of the loan, he may interpose a cross-claim against Gra so that in the event of a judgment against them, then Gal can demand reimbursement from Gra
ff > during pendency, Gal files cross-claim against Gra however Gra is disposing of his property w/ the end view that he may not be held ultimately liable to pay for the obligation owed to Tor or that Gal will pay for everything instead
what is the remedy
As the defendant, I can apply for writ of PA insofar as the cross-claim is concerned because Gra is disposing his assets to avoid being held liable
Suppose that Tor files a case against Gal for sum of money but you have evidence that Gra is also liable for the obligation however he is quick to dispose of his property
what is your remedy?
apply for writ of PA as a defendant insofar as a third-party complaint is concerned such that
When to apply for PA?
[commencement of action]
- incorporated in a verified complaint
- may be ex parte issuance of writ of PA
[any time before entry of judgment]
- issued while case is on appeal (issued by CA/SC)
- prior notice and hearing is required
Juan filed a petition for certiorari on the ground that the court acted in grave abuse of discretion issuing a writ of PA against him when he has already received summons and no hearing or notice was given to him.
is his contention tenable?
Yes, his contention is tenable
GR: writ of PA requires prior notice & hearing before issuance if it is applied for after the filing of the complaint
XPN: application of writ embodied in the complaint require no prior notice & hearing.
????????????????????
GR: The court issuing a PA ex parte as a rule, the implementation of the PA requires **prior or contemporaneous service of the;
- complaint,
- summons,
- application for issuance of writ of PA
- order of attachment
- affidavit & bond filed in court in support of the writ
where a PA is applied for in a complaint, the court may issue a PA even without prior hearing [and] notice
Juan accused judge of gross negligence for granting a PA after a judgment has been rendered. is juan’s argument tenable?
No, so long as the judgment has not attained finality, then a PA can still be validly be had
Juan appeal his case to the CA. Because of the lack of foresight of his counsel, he was only able to apply for writ of PA pending appeal. who will grant the writ? The trial court or the appellate court?
appellate court
Kinds of Attachment
- PA
- Garnishment
- Levy upon execution
in Garnishiment, once garnished, can the plaintiff receive the property or claim from the garnishee of the adverse party by order of the sheriff?
No, the sheriff cannot order that the credit be paid to the plaintiff upon garnishment because it is only AFTER judgment against the judgment obligor has become final and executory that payment then is to be made.
the adverse party in a garnishment argues that the order is improper as the garnishee did not receive a service of summons. is this tenable?
[b]
he further argues that the garnishee was not impleaded in the case as a co-defendant
[c]
the sheriff, in garnishment took the properties or the claim in a bank and brought it to court awating final jdugment. is this proper?
No, SoS is not required to bind the garnishee but it is enough that the garnishee is served with a copy of the writ of preliminary attachment
[b]
based on prevailing JP, insofar as garnishment is concerned, there is no actual need to implement 3rd persons in the action
[c]
No, this is untenable and improper of the court sheriff to do so. there is no need for the sheriff to take possession
what is levy upon execution?
requires decision to attain finality
process employed (AFTER) judgment has become final and executory where the property of the Judgment obligor is set aside and taken into custody of the court for the sale of the property of the same for the satisfaction of the judgment
GROUNDS for the issuance of the writ of PA
[1]
- action for recovery of SPECIFIED amount of money [or] damages
other than ~moral~ [and] ~exemplary~
- on a cause of action arising from; law, contract, quasi-contract, delict, quasi-delict
- against party who is about to depart from the Phil
- with intent to defraud his creditors
[2]
- action for MONEY [or] PROPERTY
- [emc] embezzled, fraudulently misapplied, converted
- by a Public Officer, Officer of a Corp, Atty, Factor, Broker, Agent, or Clerk, or any other person in a fiduciary capacity
- in the course of his employment or
- willful violation of duty
[3]
- action to RECOVER POSSESSION OF PROPERTY
- [tdc] unjustly or fraudulently taken, detained, or converted
- when property or part thereof has been
- [crd] concealed, removed, or disposed of
- to prevent its being found or taken by applicant or an authorized person
[4]
- action against party Guilty of FRAUD in contracting debt/obligation upon which the action is brought [or] performance thereof
[5]
- action against party who has REMOVED or DISPOSED of his property, [or]
- is about to do so
- with intent to defraud his creditors
[6]
- action against party who
- DOES NOT RESIDE, and NOT FOUND in the Phil, [or]
- whom summons may be served by PUBLICATION
[7]
- even if def’t in the case is actually residing in the Phil
- when the case allows service of summons via PUBLICATION
[8]
- another ground *other than def’t trying to dispose of his properties to defraud his creditors,
- then issuance is PA is justified but NOT on the ground that def’t is outside Phil but on the ground
- he is trying to dispose of his properties with INTENT to defraud his creditors