RTS Flashcards
late phase RTS management general
running progression
- running>sprinting
agility/plyometrics
- cutting/pivoting
- jumping/landing
late phase RTS management - sport specific
what do they need to do? practice drills?
incorporate ball/defender
unanticipated movement
research says LE RTS testing
85% of studies for RTS testing were for knee injury (82% were ACL)
6.2% studies looked at RTS after hip
2 studies looked at RTS after ankle sprain
most RTS criterion lack validity T or F
T
1 risk factor for injury
1 risk factor for having an injury is previously having that injury
RTS testing goal
Determine physical and psychological readiness
- While respecting biological healing
Reduce risk of re-injury
passing RTS criteria means
It means they are cleared to begin a RTS progression
does not mean the athlete can go right back to game play
RTS rates for ACL
Return to any sport: 82%
Return to pre-injury sport: 63%
Return to pre-injury competition level: 44%!!!!
Second ACL injury rates (Wiggins 2016 AJSM)
Under 25 yo and RTS: 23%!!!!!
problem
Only 13% of studies used some sort of objective measure
Even worse: of those 13% the majority used a Lachman as their ONLY objective measure
general principles of RTS testing
time (biology)
symmetry (ROM full - unless risk factor. Strength 90% contralateral at MIN)
objective measures
- ROM
- strength
- functional testing
patient reported
- function
- fear/confidence
RTS testing time (biology)
Follow tissue healing timeframes
Ligamentization, Bone Bruise, Mechanoreceptors
We can’t rush biology… yet
Time alone does NOT guarantee physical readiness
RTS testing - patient reported
function: make sure the tool you use is appropriate for the population - sport specific, body region specific
fear/confidence - growing literature base exploring psychological effects
general LE
strength training
- mmt is NOT good enough, use HHD 1RM, dynamometer
negative clinical exam
- special tests, ORM, effusion, etc
functional testing
- compare to uninvolved limb or norms if not healthy
LE ACL necessary measures
recommended objective cut off - 90% contralateral side
even if passing, can still fail for poor quality of movement
ACL-RSI score above 56
KOS score 90% or higher
LE ACL outcomes of symmetrical strength
6 months - 20% common deficits
12 months - 10-20% deficits
24 months 1/3 have > 10%
the problem - athletes return 6-12 months likely with deficits
quad strength -
associated with function and critical to dynamic knee stability - prolonged deficits to a critical dynamic stabilizer