RTS Flashcards

1
Q

late phase RTS management general

A

running progression
- running>sprinting

agility/plyometrics
- cutting/pivoting
- jumping/landing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

late phase RTS management - sport specific

A

what do they need to do? practice drills?

incorporate ball/defender

unanticipated movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

research says LE RTS testing

A

85% of studies for RTS testing were for knee injury (82% were ACL)
6.2% studies looked at RTS after hip
2 studies looked at RTS after ankle sprain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

most RTS criterion lack validity T or F

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1 risk factor for injury

A

1 risk factor for having an injury is previously having that injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RTS testing goal

A

Determine physical and psychological readiness
- While respecting biological healing

Reduce risk of re-injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

passing RTS criteria means

A

It means they are cleared to begin a RTS progression
does not mean the athlete can go right back to game play

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

RTS rates for ACL

A

Return to any sport: 82%
Return to pre-injury sport: 63%
Return to pre-injury competition level: 44%!!!!
Second ACL injury rates (Wiggins 2016 AJSM)
Under 25 yo and RTS: 23%!!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

problem

A

Only 13% of studies used some sort of objective measure

Even worse: of those 13% the majority used a Lachman as their ONLY objective measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

general principles of RTS testing

A

time (biology)

symmetry (ROM full - unless risk factor. Strength 90% contralateral at MIN)

objective measures
- ROM
- strength
- functional testing

patient reported
- function
- fear/confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

RTS testing time (biology)

A

Follow tissue healing timeframes
Ligamentization, Bone Bruise, Mechanoreceptors
We can’t rush biology… yet
Time alone does NOT guarantee physical readiness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RTS testing - patient reported

A

function: make sure the tool you use is appropriate for the population - sport specific, body region specific

fear/confidence - growing literature base exploring psychological effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

general LE

A

strength training
- mmt is NOT good enough, use HHD 1RM, dynamometer

negative clinical exam
- special tests, ORM, effusion, etc

functional testing
- compare to uninvolved limb or norms if not healthy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LE ACL necessary measures

A

recommended objective cut off - 90% contralateral side

even if passing, can still fail for poor quality of movement

ACL-RSI score above 56

KOS score 90% or higher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

LE ACL outcomes of symmetrical strength

A

6 months - 20% common deficits
12 months - 10-20% deficits
24 months 1/3 have > 10%

the problem - athletes return 6-12 months likely with deficits

quad strength -
associated with function and critical to dynamic knee stability - prolonged deficits to a critical dynamic stabilizer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

lower limb symmetry index

A

single hop for distance

triple hop for distance

cross over hop for distance

6m hop for time

17
Q

what are the findings ACL

A

in the first.2 yrs after ACLR, 30% of people who returned to level 1 sports sustained a reinjury compared with 8% of those who practiced in lower level sports

for every month that RTS was delayed, until 9. months after ACLR, the rate of knee reinjury was reduced by 51%

more symmetrical quad strength prior to RTS significant reduced reinjury rate

18
Q

LE ACL conclusions

A

RTS does reduce second injury risk
Need to objectively measure
Can’t Assume
Time alone is not enough

19
Q

RTS progression - graded exposure

A

Return to practice drills
Return to practice contact drills
Return to game (limited time)
Return to game full time

Progress using intensity, opponents, time/volume
There is a large gap in our healthcare system for this population
Solutions?

20
Q
A
21
Q

UE RTS recommendations

A

Very little evidence
75% use only time

Current Recommendations:(afrer shoulder dislocation?)
No pain/instability ( -apprehension)
Full ROM
90%+ strength (Higher if dominant arm is the involved arm)
No symptoms with sport specific exercise/drills
6 Months post-op for shoulder instability

22
Q

UE throwers

A

Return to throwing progression (elbow or shoulder)
Progress intensity and/or distance, throw type

23
Q

on field

A

After cleared for significant injury
ABC’s -> Bleeding -> Spinal/head injury -> Fracture/dislocation

24
Q

on field if player wants to return

A

Determine if continuing to play will increase risk of injury severity
- Rules sometimes bent depending on the importance of the game

Determine if there are any impairments and if they can play safely with those
-Protective strength
-Neuromuscular control
-Protective sensation
-Functional testing: Running, cutting, jumping, push-up (Sport & Position specific)