Rotator Cuff Tears Flashcards

1
Q

prevalence

A

age >60: 28% have a full thickness tear, Age>70: 65% have a full thickness tear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

risk factors for rotator cuff tear

A

age, smoking, HLD, family history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

age you worry about cuff tears with dislocation

A

> 40 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is internal impingement

A

Due to posterior capsular contracture, leading to partial thicknes articular sided tear of the roattor cuff do to wind up (wrong - its the deceleration phase)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

fucntion of the rotator cuff

A

balances the force couples in the shoulder: subscap vs. infra/teres and subscap/infra/teres vs. the deltoid. Supraspinatus is the primary initiator of abduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

function of supraspinatus

A

Initiates and assists deltoid in abduction of arm and acts with other rotator cuff muscles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

rotator cuff footprint

A

supraspinatus 12.7 mm in wdith mediolateral, a a tear of 6-7 mm is a 50% tear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

where does tear start

A

15 mm posterior ot biceps tendon at junction of supraspinatus and ifnraspinatus, in degenerative tears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AP dimensino of infra/supra

A

20 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

layers to the rotator cuff

A

5 layers, strong is layer 2 (3-5 mm thickness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

contents of rotator interval

A

CHL, SGHL, biceps tendon, and capsule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

bursal or aritcular is more vascular

A

bursal is more vascular, articular side is more commonly involved in degen tears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the rotator crescent

A

rotator cuff tendon extending from the cable medially to the footprint, it is thin and is comprised of the infra and supra

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is rotator cable

A

it is a thickening of the tendon which is formed by the coracohumeral ligament, it is towards the end of the infra/supraspinatus tendons, it has been likened to a suspension bridge in terms of it’s function.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

sizes of rotator cuff tears

A

small is 0-1 cm, medium is 1-3 cm, large is 3-5 cm, massive is >5 cm (invovles 2 or more tendons)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Classification for rotator cuff tears,

A

Cofield or Ellman, depeneding on the typeFu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Full thickness tear classification

A

Cofield 1982, cuff tear sizes small 0-1, medium 1-3, large 3-5, massive >5 cm (2 or more tendons).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

partial thickness tear classification

A

Ellman, Grade 1 <3 mm, 2 is 3-6 mm, III is >6 mm (>50%) of supra tear. A is articular, B is bursal, C intratendinous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

SLAP lesion cuases

A

overuse injury in overhead atheletes or traumatic falls in older patients. Deep shoulder pain and biceps tendonitis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

slap mechanism in throwers

A

tight PIGHL, shifts contact point of GHJ posterosuperiorly increasing the shear force on the superior labrum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

function of the biceps tendon during throwing

A

contributes to torsional and horizontal stability during late-cocking phase of throwing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

slap tear biceps tenderness?

A

yes can have biceps groove tenderness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Tests for biceps

A

Speed’s test, Yergason’s and Kim biceps load test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

how to perform speed’s test

A

FF 90 degrees, supinated, resist downward pressure. Or initialy descrived as starting with arm at side and FF with supinated 0-60

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

how to perform yergasons

A

pronated with arm at side, try to supinate, thumb on groove to feel for subluxation

26
Q

how to perform kim biceps load test

A

abduct shouler 120 degrees, elbow bent 90, have them bend elbow against resistance

27
Q

obriens test also known as

A

Active compression test

28
Q

Crank test description

A

abduct to 160 degrees supine patient, axial load and internally/exteronally rotate tyring to pinch the SLAp tear

29
Q

dynamic labral shear test

A

place in ABER position, push anteriorly on huemral head, then raise up to 90-160 degrees if pain or click

30
Q

kibler anterior slide test

A

place hands onhips, thumb pointing posteriorly, examiner axially pushes up on the elbow and pain should be felt anteriorly

31
Q

use of apprehension in SLAP tears

A

positive in 85% of patients

32
Q

treatment for slap tears by age

A

tenotomy/tenodesis for those over 40 years of age

33
Q

what is peel back

A

SLAP tear, go into ABER position should see labrum peel back

34
Q

most common complication SLAP repair

A

stiffness, 78% of patients

35
Q

SLAP repair in older patients with ARCR patients risk

A

stiffness

36
Q

Other NV risks with SLAP repair

A

overdrilling glenoid leading to Suprascapular nerve injury

37
Q

subacromial impingement due to what

A

impingenet of the cuff against acromion, CA ligament, AC joint

38
Q

acromial types

A

TYpe 1 flat, 2 curved, 3 hooked. Bigliani

39
Q

Yocum test

A

hand on contraltaeral extremity and raise the elbow up, sensitive but not specific.

40
Q

internal impingemnt test

A

positive if pain with ABER

41
Q

GIRD associated with

A

SLAP lesion

42
Q

normal acromiohumeral interval

A

7-14 mm

43
Q

findings of rotator cuff dsiease on xray

A

traction osteophytes, subchondral cysts at greater tuberosity, CA ligamen tcalficiation, typ3. hooked acormion

44
Q

Subacromial bursa histology

A

high levels of metalloprotesaes and other inflammatory cytokines

45
Q

prp for impingemnt

A

insufficient evidence to support use with a recent meta analysis

46
Q

Internal impingement symptoms

A

Diagnosis is may clinically with worsening posterior shoulder pain during maximal abduction and external rotation (position of late cocking) associated with decreased internal rotation and supplemented with MRI showing posterior rotator cuff and posterior labral pathology.

47
Q

GIRD findings

A

smaller arc of motion and elevated ER

48
Q

GIRD mechanism of pain

A

ABER in late cocking and early acceleration leads to pel back by the biceps. Supraspinatus undersurface impinges on posteroupseiro rglenoid

49
Q

bennet lesion

A

hypertrophy and scarring of posterior capsule glenoid. exostosis of posteroinferior glenoid on xray

50
Q

GIRD etiology

A

PIGHL tightness, anterior microinstaiblity

51
Q

apprehension test and internal impingement

A

positive for pain

52
Q

gird translates humeral head

A

anterosuperior, opposite of tight strecutures in flexion, however in ABER ledas to posteropusruperior translation

53
Q

slap and gird

A

throws with gird are 25% more likely to have a slap lesion

54
Q

GIRD number of IR degrees

A

> 20-25 degrees decrease and smaller arc

55
Q

gird treatment

A

sleeper stretch, cross body adduction stretch, pec minor stretching

56
Q

gird surgery

A

posteiror capsule release and anterior stablization

57
Q

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with and without Acromioplasty in the Treatment of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
MacDonald, Peter MD, FRCSC1; McRae, Sheila MSc1; Leiter, Jeffrey MSc, PhD1; Mascarenhas, Randy MD1; Lapner, Peter MD, FRCSC2
Author Information
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 93(21):p 1953-1960, November 2, 2011.

A

WORC and ASES scores improved significantly in each group over time (p < 0.001). There were no differences in WORC or ASES scores between the groups that had arthroscopic cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at any time point. There were no differences in scores on the basis of acromion type, nor were any interaction effects identified between group and acromion type. Four participants (9%) in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair alone, one with a Type-2 and three with a Type-3 acromion, required additional surgery by the twenty-four-month time point. The number of patients who required additional surgery was greater (p = 0.05) in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair alone than in the group that had arthroscopic cuff repair and acromioplasty.

Conclusions:
Our findings are consistent with previous research reports in which there was no difference in functional and quality-of-life indices for patients who had rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty. The higher reoperation rate was found in the group without acromioplasty. Further study that includes follow-up imaging and patient-reported outcomes over a greater follow-up period is needed.

58
Q

Risk factors for lack of repair healing

A

Factors influencing the risk of failure in tendon healing after primary
rotator cuff repair1:
■ AP tear size
■ Grade of infraspinatus
fatty infiltration
■ Bone mineral density
■ Tear retraction
■ Increasing age >70 years
■ Level of work activity

59
Q

Forsythe B, Agarwalla A, Puzzitiello RN, Mascarenhas R, Werner BC. Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;7(2).

A

Results:
There were 15,257 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis. Of these, 9274 patients (60.8%) underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, while 5983 (39.2%) underwent open biceps tenodesis. A total of 171 patients (1.8%) and 111 patients (1.9%) required revision biceps tenodesis after arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis, respectively (P = .5). Male sex (OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.85]; P = .02) was the only independent risk factor for revision biceps tenodesis after the index open biceps tenodesis. After arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, age >45 years (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89]; P = .01) and concomitant rotator cuff tear (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71]; P < .001) were independent protective factors for revision biceps tenodesis. The total cost of revision biceps tenodesis after open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis was US$3427.95 and US$2174.33 per patient, respectively.
Conclusion:
There was no significant difference in the revision rate between arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis. Risk factors for revision surgery included male sex for open biceps tenodesis, while age >45 years and rotator cuff tears were protective factors for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.

60
Q

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 66-71
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Shoulder
Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament
Author links open overlay panelBrett Sanders MD a, Kyle P. Lavery BA b, Scott Pennington MD c, Jon J.P. Warner MD b

A

When all techniques that released the biceps sheath (6.8%, 4/59) were compared to those that did not release the biceps sheath (20.6%, 14/68), a statistically significant difference was found, P = .026 (chi-square). Proximal arthroscopic techniques were revised at a significantly higher rate than distal tenodesis techniques (P = .005).

Conclusion
Biceps tenodesis techniques which do not release the biceps sheath or remove the tendon from the sheath have increased revision rates, compared to techniques that do. This may be supportive evidence for the theory that residual pain generating elements in the biceps groove is a cause of failure of proximal tenodesis methods.