Romanian Orphan Studies Flashcards

1
Q

Name two studies into orphans and their effects of Institutionalisation.

A

Rutter et al (2011) and Zeanah et al (2005).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the procedure of Rutter et al’s research into Romanian orphans?

A

A longitudinal study that followed a group of 165 orphans adopted in Britain to see if good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions. Development was assessed at 4, 6, 11 and 15. A group of 52 British children adopted around the same time served as the control group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the finding of Rutter et al’s research?

A

At 11, their development showed differential rates of recovery related to the age of adoption. The mean IQ of those adopted before 6 months was 102, between 6-24 months it was 86 and after 2 years it was 77. Those adopted after 6 months (26%) showed signs of disinhibited attachment (attention seeking and indiscriminate friendliness to all adults- no stranger anxiety).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure for Zeanah et al’s research into the effects of institutionalisation on orphans?

A

Assessed attachment in 95 children ages 12-31 months who had spent most of the their in an institutional care. Compared to a control group of 50 people who had never lived in an institution. Attachment type was measured by the Strange Situation. In addition, carers asked about signs of disinhibited attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the findings of Zeanah et al’s research into the effects of institutionalisation on orphans?

A

74% of the control group was securely attached while 19% of institutional group were securely attached. 65% were classified as disorganised attachment. The description of disinhibited attachment applied to 44% of institutionalised children as opposed to less than 20% of the controls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name 2 effects of institutionalisation.

A

Disinhibited attachment and low IQ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Positive evaluation points for Rutter et al?

A
  • High internal validity due to it measuring what it set out to. As he entered the orphanage at really early stage, other factors can be ruled out.
  • There are practical applications. All institutions now allocate a key worker so that children can have a safe base away from the caregiver.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negative evaluation points of Rutter et al?

A
  • The findings are deterministic
  • The long term effects of institutionalisation are not clear yet due to the study not being completed (longitudinal study).
  • There may be researcher bias as the children are not randomly allocated due to the research being natural.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly