Roman Law Flashcards

1
Q

According to Livius, when was Rome founded

A

On the 21st of April of 753 BC by bother Romulus and Remus (twins). They were exiles from Alba Longa and founded a refuge for refugees which would become Rome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did they decide which of the two brothers wil be king

A

They asked the gods:

  • Remus is said to have received the first auspicium (bird watching): six vultures appeared to him
  • For Romulus, however, double the number of vultures appeared(12) ; after killing Remus, Romulus was claimed the ruler and the city was called after him: Rome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define imperium

A

imperium is one and indivisible and it entails supreme power (religious,
executive, judicial and legal power; the latter gave the possibility to enact
edicts).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How was Montesquieu’s separation of powers integrated into Romulus’ reign

A
  1. The king had the competence to enact laws based on his imperium and these were
    called edicta
  2. The legislative body, the comitia, could take statutory decisions that were called
    leges (lex)
  3. The senate consisted of one hundred pater familias; their decision did not have the
    power of law, instead, they served as advisors to the king (senatus consulta).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many kings reigned Rome

A

752 BC - 509 BC -> 7 kings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

From when to when was Rome a republic

A

509 BC - 27 BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

From when to when was Rome an empire

A

27 BC - 476 AD/ 1453 AD -> empire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did the kingdom of Rome end

A

The murder of Tarquinius Superbus (509 BC)-> a new constitution was established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why was the period of the republic recorded as the days of liberty (res publication: Libertas) ?

A

Imperium was not in the hand of the king but two consuls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the nature of consuls

A

-both had full imperium

-Intercessio (intercession): the two consuls could take countermeasures against each other, but no extreme decisions were taken, rather a middle ground was reached

-were appointed for one year by the public assembly

  • during their office they were immune to prosecutions, but after they could be prosecuted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the sources of law in the roman republic

A
  1. Edicts (edicere: to ordain) = ordinances
  2. Statute (lex)= legislation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were edicts

A

-The imperium enabled the consuls to enact edicts, namely ordinances or executive orders.

-it was snot legislation because consuls were not legislators BUT the edicts had binding powers for as long a s the imperium of the consul lasted (a year)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are statutes

A

-made by the assembly of the roman people=comitia ( all citizens together voted)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How was the legislative procedure of passing statutes

A
  1. Magistrate proposed a bill
  2. Senate was later consulted ( comitia and senate needed to agree)
  3. Magistrate would call for an assembly
  4. People would vote yes or no
    -if yes, the adopted bill would become a statute (lex-leges) AND legislation would stay valid until its as revoked by the comitia (different from edicts) TRHUS leges were independent from imperium
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the voting rights int he roman republic

A
  • only makes voted
    -Society was divided into classes based on how much property they had. The first class would vote first and subsequently, the second class - the former vote had the most weight with respect to the other lower classes.
  • There was no representation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Did edicts or statutes prevail?

A

Statutes, because edicts could be revoked by the comitia as a way to show that the dignity and might of the people was greater than those of the consul

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was teh first era of the roman republic characterised by

A

the battle between patricians (sons of the pater familias) and the plebeians (plebs: people). The patricians wanted their authority returned as they worked side by side with the King during the Roman kingdom. They were the only ones that could be consuls and they would also constitute the senate (Senex: old man).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How did the tribunus plebis emerge

A

After a severe collision between these two classes in 494 BC, the plebeians requested their own magistrate. The latter was known as the plebeian tribunals (tribuni plebis) -> although the magistrate had no imperium, they had the right to veto any measures taken by the consuls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did plebians demand in their second outburst and why

A

Asked for the laws to be codified in written law because roman law was primarily based on customary law and judges wouldn’t explain their reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was lex XII Tabularum - ius civile

A

-in 451 BC The two consuls were replaced by a board of ten men (decemviri). They held the imperium and wrote the law on ten tables.

-in 450 BC a new board of the men was elected with a na edition of two more tables -> became known as the Twelve tables (lex duodecim tabularum) as they were written in twelve tables

-these were the first roman codifications and were never revoked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What was the problem of interpretation

A

Even though by 450 BC Rome had already written legislation, the interpretation (interpretation) of such rules remained in the hands of the patricians and unknown to the people since the patricians kept it a secret from the plebeians.

-ius civile/ law of the citizens of Rome developed form the interpretion of the twelve tables

-Alongside came the idea of the strictness of legal actions (legis actiones) because they derived from the laws or because they had been adjusted precisely to the wording of the laws.-> so the patricians had control over interpreting and applying them while plebians didn’t understand much

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Who ended the situation of legal uncertainty in 300 BC

A

Gnaeus Flavius who revealed the secret of interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When did plebians demand becoming magistrates and consuls

A

367 BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Who was the praetor (ius praetorium)

A

-a high magistrate for the administration of justice that had imperium (power to enact edicts binding to all citizens)

-decided whether a case could be brought before a judge.

-Soon afterwards plebeians were also eligible to hold the praetura.

-praetor was assisted by legal experts

-He placed himself in a tribunal where the parties would appear before him. He was not to pass judgment himself as that was the job of the iudex privatus (a private person); nonetheless, no trial could take place without the praetor.

-the praetor decided how judges should be appointed by writing down the formula of ownership (rei vindicatio)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

After the praetor appointed the judge, how was the trial before the praetor carried out through two stages:

A
  1. Legal, before the praetor (access admissibility – decides if the case should go to
    the judge)
  2. Factual, before the judge – the judge decides on the facts of the case; lawyers are
    not needed, Romans would use orators that would give very convincing speeches
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What happned in the long run, in order for actions to no longer be determined via the complicated path of the lax

A

-the edicts for the praetor were used
-teh issued edicts were then used by each of the successors of the praetor after one year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is the difference between civil law and praetorian law

A

-civil law originated from the interpretation of the twelve tables

-praetorian law was based on the authoritarian power of the magistrate held by virtue of his imperium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What was the function of praetorian law

A

-to support, supplement and improve civil law (law of the twelve tables)

-According to reasonableness and equity (ex bono et aequo) the praetor could change civil law (praetorian law - living voice of civil law).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is lex hortensia

A

Decisions made in the meetings of the plebs now had the force of law and were binding on patricians.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What makes the end of the roman republic and the birth of the Roman Empire

A

Death of Caesar in 44 BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Who succeeded Caesar after his death?

A

Adopted son Octavius, later known as Augustus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

How did Augustus hold power?

A

He awarded himself 3 statuses:

❖ the proconsul for life → possibility to enact legislation, hold imperium

❖ the power of the tribunicia potestas for life → veto power

❖ a place in the senate (he was seen as the princeps) → Senatus Consulta (senate
advice started to have a legal effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

When was the start of the imperial age in the Roman Empire

A

27 BC, even though the form of government of the Republic had not changed (Rome was still a republic de jure); it lasted until 476 AD (while in the East it lasted until 1453 AD).

34
Q

Who took over Rome after Augustus

A

Tiberius

35
Q

Why did the comitia fall in disuse during he reign of Tiberius

A

The Roman Empire had grown too much through more and more people gaining roman citizenship thus everyone got the vote making it difficult to make decisions

36
Q

What solution to the fall of the comitia was created

A

Imperial law (lex de imperio) -> the Roman people were given the possibility to the emperor to propose legislation (transfer of sovereignty to the emperor). Therefore, the legislative power became the power the emperor.

37
Q

What bindingmeasures was the emperor responsible for applying

A
  1. edicta
  2. Mandata
    3.decreta
  3. Rescripta
38
Q

What are edictas

A

Traditional legislation

39
Q

What are mandata

A

Intsuctions to subordinates, especially provincial governors

40
Q

Descreta

A

Decisions of the emperor sitting as a judge

41
Q

What are rescripta

A

Letters written to the emperor to seek advice on legal situations, the emperor’s response had legal validity

42
Q

What did praetors decide

A

decided who could start a trial and was basically the voice of civil law.

43
Q

Which emperor wanted to get rid of teh influence of praetors

A

Hadrian, because the emperor was the only one who could change and enact law

44
Q

How did emperor Hudrian get rid of the the influence of a praetor

A

Emperor Hadrian asked Salvius Julian to write a fixed edict, which became known as the Praetor’s Edict or Edictum Perpetuum, a sort of album where the praetors’ edicts would be written and rested in force forever and only the emperor could change the text that was fixed. With such an Edict the praetors lost legislative power.

45
Q

What was teh law of the jurists- ius

A

-When legal proceedings started before the praetor in Rome, Parties sought advice from private jurists.

-Private jurists wrote opinions known as “responsa” on legal questions.

-Responsa gained legal status when publicly approved by the emperor.

-This approval was termed “ius publice respondendi.”

-Approved responsa had binding force on judges based on the emperor’s authority.

-The emperor essentially took on the role of a judge.

-The increased significance and usage of responsa led to the emperor’s involvement.

-Over time, these opinions gained the status of law, known as “ius.”

46
Q

When did the roman started having two capitals

A

In 330 AD a “New Rome” was inaugurated: the second Rome, or also known as Constantinople, was placed in the city of Byzantium.

❖ The old Rome in the West (Rome)
❖ The new Rome in the East (Constantinople)
➔ Both emperors held the indivisible imperium (legislative power) over the whole
Empire.

47
Q

Why did the western roman empire fall

A

In 476 AD Barbarian tribes invaded and Romulus Augustus who emperor in the west was overthrown by the Germanic leader Odoacer, who then became the sole ruler of the whole empire

48
Q

When was Justinian emperor

A

527-565 AD

49
Q

Who was emperor Justinian so significant

A

Because the ultimate shape of the roman law was the result of the legislative work of emperor Justinian

50
Q

Give facts about emperor Justinian

A

-his factual power was limited to the eastern area
- wanted to marry Theodora
-wanted to control all to which eh was legally entitled to
-wanted to restore the empire by way of force and by law by aiming t codify and stucturing the sources of law, namely imperial laws and writings of jurists

51
Q

What were the names of oldest collections of constitutions that were made by private individuals

A

-codex Gregorianus
-codex Hermogenianus

52
Q

Why were codex gregorianus and hermogenianus given the name codex even though they lacked the authority necessary for codification?

A

-the term “codex” was used more broadly to refer to a book or collection of documents. It didn’t necessarily imply the same level of legislative authority that the term “code” might imply today.

-While these collections lacked the authority of a comprehensive legal code, they were still considered valuable sources of legal guidance. The imperial rescripts and juristic interpretations included in these codices were often seen as important references for legal practitioners.

53
Q

What is the lex prosterior rule

A

Principle that when there are conflicting laws, the one that is enacted later in time takes precedence over the earlier one

54
Q

What was codex theodosianus

A

-In 426, Theodosius II, the Eastern Roman Emperor, tried to organize sources of law.

-He compiled constitutions after the Codices and relevant jurists’ writings in the Codex Theodosianus.

-It was considered a codification because everything needed to be written down in the textbook for validity.

-However, it didn’t exclude older imperial legislation.

55
Q

What was corpus iuris civilis and what four parts did it consist of

A

Almost one hundred years later, Justinian appointed a committee that had to perform the same task as Theodosius and compose a new body of civil law. Justinian’s legislation consists of four parts:

  1. Codex justinianus
    2.digest
    3.institutes
    4.codex repetitae praelectionis
  2. Novels
56
Q

What was codex justinianus (first edition) (529 AD) in the corpus iuris civilis by emperor Justinian

A

-was divided into twelve books ( reference to the twelve tables)

-contained imperial constitutions

-due to exclusivity it replaced previous codices such as Codex Gregorianus and Hermogenianus and the Codex Theodosianus.

-The constitutions within the were arranged chronologically with dates, therefore the lex posterior rule applied.

57
Q

What was the digest (533 AD) in the corpus iuris civilis by emperor Justinian

A

-Justinian believed that there were more than only five good jurists (Lex Citandi) to refer to. -> With the Digests, jurists’ opinions became part of the law. + became the most important piece of legislation

-Lex Posterior Rule Exclusion:
The rule that newer laws override older ones (lex posterior) doesn’t apply in the Digest. All the laws within it were implemented on the same day in 533 AD.

-Instead of applying the lex posterior rule, the Digest relies on judicial interpretation if contradictions arise, even though Justinian believed there couldn’t be contradictions in his statutes.

58
Q

What were institutes (533 AD) in the corpus iuris civilis by emperor Justinian

A

-same year as the digest Justinian introduced a textbook that contained the main principles of roman law that was aimed at first year law students

-lex prosterior rule could not be applied

-later, gained the status of law

59
Q

What was codex reoetitae praelectionis (revised edition of the codex 529) (534) in the corpus iuris civilis by emperor Justinian

A

-the revision of the codex revoked the previous one because it included the latest laws in the codex -> the previous version was no longer valid

-The rule of lex posterior can be applied -> enactments have their own date and are put in chronological order

60
Q

What were the novels (534) in the corpus iuris civilis by emperor Justinian

A

A long series of constitutions were created, called novellae constitutiones, indicating that they were composed after the completion of Justinian’s legislation. Lex posterior rule can be applied.

61
Q

Summarise the case of madbury v. Madison

A

Facts
• For the appointment of judges to have effect, the letter of apointment needed a signature +
to be handed to the judge

• Letter was not handed over to Marbury by the new president, Maddison

• Marbury started proceedings at the Supreme Court, asking them to order Maddison to hand over the letter of appointment
• Constitution: Supreme court has jurisdicion - Judiciary act: Supreme Court has not

-Arguments used were derived from natural law

62
Q

Q7: How can it be explained that the opinions of jurists eventually became a source of law in Roman law?

A

They were seen to be experts on the laws so their opinions became binding and they gained importance. Emperor Augustus:
- Granted the right of their (Jurists) opinions becoming binding. The Roman jurists advised the preator, judge, etc; therefore, the jurists almost created Roman law in complete.

63
Q

Q8: During Rome’s history several authorities have had the power to produce statutes. Name them.

A

They could create and publish laws: The Emperor and King, the comitia ( assembly of roman citizens), assembly of plebeians, the senate. The consuls could make laws but they were only valid for one year (duration of their office).

64
Q

Q9: The constitution of Marcian is taken from the last, twelfth, book. With that number the codifiers of the Corpus Iuris Civilis paid symbolic tribute to an earlier Roman codification. Which one? When was it made?

A

The number twelve in the codification of the Corpus Iuris Civilis, specifically in the constitution of Marcian, pays symbolic tribute to the Twelve Tables, an earlier Roman codification. The Twelve Tables were created around 451–449 BCE, making them one of the earliest attempts at codifying Roman laws.

65
Q

Q10: The constitution of Justinian is an amendment of that of Marcian. Why is Justinian’s constitution valid and Marcian’s not?

A

The latter law annules the former/previous one // The most recent goes first // Lex posterior derogat legi priori

66
Q

Q11:Why would the names of the coins that the consuls, according to Justinian, were allowed to throw into the audience, be Greek?

A

The dominant language during the time of Justinian was greek.
476 - End of the Western Roman Empire but in the east there’s still an Empire. Justian became the Emperor of the remnant empire and had the goal of re-establishing the big Empire with arms and laws.

67
Q

Q12: Why was Justinian’s codification in Latin?

A
  • Practicality → the constitutions and opinions were all written in Latin originally.
  • Politics → Justinian wanted to restore the glory of Rome, and that meant using the
    language of Roman public affairs.
68
Q

Summarise the case of popov and hayashi

A

Popov (plaintiff) and Hayashi (defendant) were spectators at a baseball game. The 73rd ball that resulted in a home run hit in their direction. Initially, Popov caught the ball but due to crowding by the people surrounding him, he lost grip of the ball. Hayashi was standing near and picked up the ball that had fallen from Popov. Popov tried to recover
the ball from Hayashi and this resulted in a struggle over who the rightful owner was.

69
Q

In what two senses did emperor Justinian want to reunite the Roman Empire

A
  • De Facto → ‘by force’
  • He led a number of successful campaigns to reconquer Western Rome. - De Jure → ‘by law’
  • He wanted to cement imperial authority, through codification.
70
Q

Why was the marbury v. Madison case so important

A

because it established the right for the US Supreme Court to review the validity of acts of the legislature against the constitution (judicial review).

71
Q

Is the law that contradicts the constitution valid?

A

Famously, Chief Justice Marshall found that the Supreme Court did have the capacity to conduct judicial review … but not all legal systems have come to the same conclusion (ex. Netherlands).

72
Q

What were the claims in the popov v. hayashi case

A

-Hayashi claimed possession by showing he was holding the ball.

-Popov argued he didn’t fully possess the ball due to interference.

73
Q

Define conversion with regards to the case of popov v. Hayashi

A

Conversion is the wrongful control over someone else’s property.

74
Q

Can a legal action for conversion proceed if the plaintiff fails to establish possession?

A

Legal answer: Yes, if an actor takes significant steps to possess property but is interrupted by unlawful acts, there’s a legally recognizable interest (pre-possessory interest) supporting a conversion claim.

75
Q

Both Popov and Hayashi had a right to the ball, but neither had a stronger claim, so what concept did the court apply when deciding the case

A

Equitable division/ joined ownership based on the strength of each claim

76
Q

What roman law arguments did the judge consider in the popov v. Hayashi case

A

The judge considered Roman law concepts:

-Donation: Emperor Hadrian’s rule of sharing a found treasure.

-Abandonment and Occupation: Emperor Justinian’s choice of donation law for coin throwing.

77
Q

What were the debates on ownership among jurists

A

Donation (gift to an unknown recipient) or Abandonment followed by Occupation.

78
Q

Substantiate that the Lex Citandi (426 AD) cannot be regarded as a codification of the ius.

A

The Lex Citandi decreed that only opinions of five jurists (Papinian, Paul, Ulpian, Modestinus
and Gaius) could be quoted in court. Opinions by other jurists were only valid in as far as they
were quoted by these five jurists. If the opinions on a legal topic differed, the opinion of the
majority counted; if they were equally divided, the opinion of the great Papinian was decisive,
and if he had not given his view on the issue, the judge could give his own judgement, using
his common sense.
The Lex Citandi did not create a code of law containing the writings of this jurists. The statute
was only meant to create clarity in the ‘jungle’ of the ius.The Lex Citandi didn’t change the
status of the ius, meaning that the ius itself remained the source of law. It was, therefore, no
codification of the ius. The writings of the jurists had not been converted into imperial law by
the Lex Citandi.

N.B. The following answer is also correct: The Lex Citandi wasn’t exclusive, because in case
of a tie without Papinian giving an opinion, the judge has to choose one of the lawyers’
opinions. In such a case the statute didn’t provide a rule.

79
Q

Name two codes of law that cannot be defined as a codification for the only reason that they
were not issued by a government.

A

• Codex Hermogenianus
• Codex Gregorianus
• DCFR
• Gratianus’ Decretum
• Extravagantes

80
Q

One of the reasons for the reception of Roman law on the continent of Europe from the 121h century onwards was that it was the law of the church. Explain.

A

-Roman law triumphed church law because it was the law of the seat of the church: Ecclesia vivit lege romana, i.e.”The Church lives according to Roman law’.

-In ecclesiastical courts, Roman law was often applied, because it was in line with natural law. Roman law was considered to be the ratio scripta.

-Customary law was often in conflict with the divine, natural law and it was therefore set aside in the ecclesiastical courts.

81
Q

What was the law of citation

A

The part dealing with jurist writings was called the Law of Citation.

-This law stated that only the opinions of specific jurists (Papinian, Paul, Ulpian, Modestinus, and Gaius) could be quoted.

-In case of conflicts among these jurists, either majority rule applied or Papianus’s opinion prevailed.

82
Q

What was in the corpus IURIS civilis

A

I. institutes (533 AD): an introductory textbook on Roman law for students.
Il. digest (533 AD): a compilation of excerpts from writings of renowned Roman jurists.
Ill. code (codex, 534 AD): a collection of existing statutes and imperial decrees.
IV. novels (novellae, after 534 AD): new laws enacted by Justinian after 534 AD that updated and
supplemented the earlier codes.