Role of education in society Flashcards
What 2 main functions of education does Durkheim identify?
- Creating social solidarity
- Teaching specialist skills
Why does Durkheim think that social solidarity is important in society?
He argues that without social solidarity, social life and cooperation would be impossible because each individual would pursue their own selfish desires
How does Durkheim argue that the education system helps to create social solidarity?
- Transmits society’s culture - its shared beliefs and values from one generation to the next
- School acts as a ‘society in miniature’ preparing us for life in wider society - both in school and work we have to cooperate with people who are neither family nor friends
How does Durkheim argue that education teaches individuals their specialist knowledge and skills that they need to play a part in the social division of labour?
- Modern industrial economies have a complex division of labour where the production of a single item usually involves the cooperation of many different specialists
Why does Parsons describe school as the ‘focal socialising agency’ in modern society?
- School acts as a bridge between the family and wider society
- The bridge is needed because family and society operate on different principles
Why is the child judged by different standards in the family and wider society such as schools?
- The child is judged by particularisitic standards in the family, the child’s status is ascribed
- Both schools and wider society judge us all by the same universal standards, a person’s status is largely achieved
How does Davis and Moore see education as a device for selection and role allocation?
- Education ‘sifts and sorts’ us by assessing an individuals aptitudes and abilities
- They argue inequality is necessary to ensure that the most important roles in society are filled by the most talented people
What are 3 criticisms of the functionalist perspective?
- There is ample evidence meritocracy doesn’t exist - achievement greatly influenced by class background
- Marxists argue education in capitalist society only transmits the ideology of the ruling class
- ‘Over-socialised view’ of people as mere puppets of society - assumes pupils will not reject schools values
What do Neoliberals argue?
- The state must not dictate to individuals how to dispose of their own property and argue that state should not provide services such as education, health and welfare
- Gov should encourage competition, privatise state-run businesses and deregulate markets - schools should become more like businesses
- Value of education lies in how well it enables the country to compete in the global marketplace
What do New Rights argue?
- The state cannot meet people’s needs and that people are best left to meet their own needs through the free market
- For this reason New Right favour the marketisation of education
What are similarities between the New Right and functionalist views?
- Both believe some people are naturally more talented than others
- Both favour a meritocratic education system
- Believe education should socialise pupils into shared values, such as competition
What is are 2 key difference between Functionalism and New Right?
- New Right argue that the education system takes a ‘one size fits all’ approach imposing uniformity and disregarding local needs
- Believe in marketising education - believe that competition between schools and empowering consumers will bring greater diversity, choice and efficiency
What does Chubb and Moe argue?
- Believer in consumer choice allowing parents to be in control to shape schools in order to meet their own needs
- Force schools to become more responsive, schools have to compete to attract ‘customers’ by improving their ‘product’ (private schools do better because they are answerable to paying consumers)
- Found 5% of LI children do better in private schools than state schools
What 2 roles of the state does New Right highlight as important?
- Imposes a framework, such as publishing Ofsted inspection reports and league tables
- State ensures that schools transmit a shared culture by imposing the National Curriculum
What are 2 criticisms of the New Right perspective?
- Marxists argue that education does not impose a shared national culture but imposes the culture of a dominant minority ruling class
- Real cause of low educational standards is not state control but social inequality and inadequate funding
- Gerwitz and Ball both argue that competition between schools benefits the MC who can use their cultural and economic capital