RODOC Flashcards
Is Arbitration an adjudicative or a non-adjudicative form of ADR?
Adjudicative
Define arbitration [25.01]
An arbitration is an adjudicative process in which an impartial arbitrator considers both sides of a dispute and makes a decision based on evidence raised by the parties.
Name 5 benefits of arbitration
- It leads to certainty of outcome for the parties
- It is private, unlike a trial in open court
- The aspects of arbitration can be tailored to the needs of a specific dispute
- The process can be structured
- The process can take the form of written submissions rather than a hearing
- The process can be simple without formal rules of evidence
- The parties can select an arbitrator with appropriate experience
Name 5 disbenefits or arbitration
1 Arbitration is not necessarily a cost saving option if a process similar to a trial is used
2 The parties leave the final decision to a third party and will be bound by it
3 Arbitration processes cannot easily deal with a party who fails to cooperate as an arbitrator will not have the same power as a judge
4 The parties must consent
5 The arbitrator needs to be selected with care and may be difficult to find
6. Arbitration may not be quick
Adjudication involves a neutral third party with specialist knowledge or experience acting under an agreed process and reaching a decision on a dispite or on specified issues.
True or false?
[2.08]
True
Parties may show an advance commitment to ADR by including an ADR clause in their ____
contract
Clauses providing for pre selection of ADR have proved effective in relation to adjudicative processes, expert determination and mediation but not where there was only a general expression of intention to use ADR. True or false? [3.05]
True
Some non adjudicative ADR is most effective if it is incorporated into a case at its outset. Give an example.
[3.06]
Early neutral evaluation
ADR may assist in clarifying issues even if does not lead to a final settlement. True or false?
True
What are the drawbacks of using ADR too early in a case? [3.07]
Time and money may be wasted
An unsuccessful ADR process may exacerbate the differences between the parties
The ADR process may be used tactically by one party rather than as a genuine attempt to settle
When will a directions questionnaire be required to be completed in a multi track case?
After the defences have been filed
In multi track cases, what do directions questionnaires contain?
Specific questions about the use of ADR
A judge may give case management instructions which include a direction in relation to the use of ADR. True or false?
True
Complete the standard ADR direction in a PD 29.10(4a) order
The parties shall by [date] consider whether the case is capable of resolution by ADR. If any party considers that the case is unsuitable for resolution by ADR, that party shall be prepared to ______________________, should the judge consider that such means of resolution were appropriate, when he is considering the appropriate costs order to make.
Name some interim orders which may be used by the Court to assist ADR [3.15]
- The Court may order that a party’s legal representative attend Court. This may be used to support ADR.
- On an application for an interim order the COurt may give directions to support the use of ADR
- The Court can order trial of a preliminary issue if the rest of the case might settle
- A Court can give specific guidance on the progress of a case, with specific warning that costs penalties may follow if guidance is not follow
It may be reasonable for a party to refuse to agree to use ADR until after a key Court decision, for example the consideration of an application to strike out the other side’s case.
True or false?
True [3.16]