Robbery/theft Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of theft under the Theft Act 1968?

A

Theft is defined under Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968 as: “Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the classification and sentencing for theft?

A

• Statutory offence
• Triable either way
• Maximum sentence: 7 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is appropriation (S.3)?

A

Defined in Section 3 of the Theft Act 1968: “Any assumption of the rights of an owner.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which cases explain appropriation?

A

• Morris: Only one right of the owner needs to be assumed.
• Corcoran v Anderton: Appropriation does not require the property to leave the owner’s possession.
• Lawrence: Appropriation can take place even where the owner consents.
• Gomez: Appropriation can occur when consent is obtained by deception.
• Hinks: Appropriation can still occur even where there is consent and no deception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does S.3(1) say about later assumption?

A

If D acquires property innocently, but later decides to keep or deal with it as owner, this still amounts to appropriation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is property under S.4 of the Theft Act 1968?

A

“Property includes money and all other property, real or personal, things in action, and other intangible property.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the categories of property under S.4?

A

• Money: Coins and banknotes
• Real property: Land/buildings (can only be stolen if severed from land)
• Personal property: Moveable items (e.g., watch, car)
• Things in action: Non-physical rights (e.g., bank account funds)
• Other intangible property: E.g., copyright

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What items are NOT property under the Theft Act?

A

• Oxford v Moss: Knowledge/confidential information is not property.
• R v Kelly and Lindsay: Body parts normally aren’t property, but may be if preserved or altered.
• S.4(3): Wild mushrooms, flowers, foliage unless taken for reward/sale.
• S.4(4): Wild animals, unless tamed.
• Electricity is not property for the purposes of theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does S.5 define as ‘belonging to another’?

A

Property is regarded as belonging to anyone with possession, control, or proprietary right/interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is key case law on ‘belonging to another’?

A

• Turner: D can steal his own property if someone else has a greater right (garage had possession of unpaid car).
• S.5(3): Property given under an obligation remains another’s until obligation is fulfilled.
• Davidge v Bunnett: Obligation to spend money on bills – spent it on herself = theft.
• S.5(4): Property received by mistake must be restored.
• AG’s Ref (1985): Extra wages paid = obligation to return.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What about abandoned property?

A

Only truly abandoned property can’t be stolen.
• Must prove owner has completely relinquished rights.
• Ricketts v Basildon: Items left outside charity shop were not abandoned — still belonged to donor until collected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is dishonesty under S.2?

A

No statutory definition.
• Feeley: Dishonesty is a question for the jury.
• S.2(1)(a): D believes he has legal right to the property (Holden).
• S.2(1)(b): D believes the owner would consent.
• S.2(1)(c): D believes the owner cannot be found with reasonable steps (Small).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What test applies if no S.2 exceptions apply?

A

The Ivey test, confirmed in Barton:
1. What was D’s knowledge/belief at the time?
2. Would an ordinary decent person consider it dishonest?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does offering to repay make an act honest?

A

No – S.2(2) says offering repayment does not make an act honest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the intention to permanently deprive (S.6)?

A

D must intend to treat the item as his own, to dispose of it regardless of the owner’s rights.

17
Q

What are key cases on intention to permanently deprive?

A

• Lavender: Taking doors and using them elsewhere = treating as own property.
• Velumyl: Taking money intending to return same value is still theft (different notes/coins).
• DPP v J and others: Returning damaged item = still intent to permanently deprive.
• Lloyd: Borrowing amounts to theft only if the item’s “goodness, virtue or practical value” is gone.
• Easom: Conditional intent (only if item is worth stealing) = not sufficient.

18
Q

What statute defines robbery?

A

Robbery is defined under Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968.

19
Q

What type of offence is robbery and what’s the maximum sentence?

A

It is an indictable offence with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

20
Q

What is the legal definition of robbery?

A

A person is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediately before or at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force.

21
Q

What is the relationship between theft and robbery?

A

Robbery is an aggravated form of theft. It cannot be proven unless a completed theft has occurred.

22
Q

What is the Actus Reus of robbery?

A
  1. Completed theft (must satisfy AR of theft)
  2. Force or threat of force
  3. Force used immediately before or at the time of the theft
  4. Force used in order to steal
23
Q

What must be present for the element of theft to be satisfied?

A

All elements of the actus reus and mens rea of theft must be satisfied.

24
Q

What case shows completed theft through force?

A

Corcoran v Anderton – Tugging at a handbag constituted force used during appropriation. Theft + force = robbery.

25
What must the examiner consider in a robbery question?
1. Establish theft (AR + MR) first 2. Then consider whether force/threat of force converts it into robbery
26
What level of force is required for robbery?
Only minimal force is needed. It is a question for the jury – (R v Dawson and James).
27
What case shows force applied to an object is enough?
Clouden – Force applied to a shopping basket (wrenched from hand) was sufficient to amount to direct force on the victim.
28
What does ‘seeks to put any person in fear of force’ mean?
It is not necessary that the victim is actually afraid – only that the defendant sought to put someone in fear.
29
Does the threat of force need to be directed at the victim?
No – force or threats can be against 'any person', not necessarily the person from whom property is taken.
30
What case shows implied threat of force is enough?
B and R v DPP – It’s not necessary to prove the victim was scared; implied threat + minimal force is sufficient.
31
When must the force or threat occur?
Immediately before or at the time of the theft. Courts interpret this liberally to include force used while escaping.
32
What case shows force during escape can still be robbery?
Lockley – Used force on a shopkeeper to escape after stealing beer. The court applied the principle of continuing acts from Hale, treating the appropriation as ongoing.
33
Must the force be used in order to steal?
Yes. If force is used for another reason, robbery is not committed. Force must be used to enable the theft.
34
What if force and theft are separate events?
It may result in a charge of theft and a separate non-fatal offence, rather than robbery.
35
What is the mens rea of robbery?
1. Mens rea of theft (dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive) 2. Intention to use force or threaten force to steal
36
Can robbery be committed recklessly?
No. There must be intent (direct or indirect) to use force or threats to steal. Recklessness is not sufficient.