Robbery Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

What was held in R v Skivington?

A

Claim of right is a defence to robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was held in R v Lapier?

A

Robbery is complete at the time the property is taken, even if momentarily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was held in R v Maihi?

A

There must be a connection or link between the act of theft and threat of violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was held in R v Peat?

A

The immediate return of goods does not purge the robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was held in R v Mitchell?

A

Previously made threats of violence to the victim can weigh on the victims mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was held in Peneha v Police?

A

Sufficient violence forcibly interferes with the victims personal freedom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was held in R v Broughton?

A

Threats can be direct or veiled, conveyed by conduct or words or both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was held in DDP v Smith?

A

Bodily harm means harm that is really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was held in R v Joyce?

A

Must establish at least two people physically present at the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was held in R v Galey?

A

Being together with means two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly